Pith. Sign in

RECORD

"photon+Jet" events rate estimation for gluon distribution determination at LHC

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 3 Nov 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It is shown that "photon+Jet" events, being collected at LHC, would provide us with the data sufficient for an extraction of gluon distribution function in a proton using valence and s quark distributions measured in the same experiment with another physical proces A new region of 10^{-4}< x < 10^{-1} with 1.6x10^3< Q^2<10^5 ~(GeV/c)^2 can be covered.

how it is stated · asserted 0.89 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/0011015 (version 2)
Pith IDQTTO6U5A, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD.V. Bandourin, N.B. Skachkov (JINR), V.F. Konoplyanikov. ""photon+Jet" events rate estimation for gluon distribution determination at LHC." arXiv:hep-ex/0011015 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/QTTO6U5A
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,367 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.87 · compares with prior results 0.19 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

It is shown that "photon+Jet" events, being collected at LHC, would provide us with the data sufficient for an extraction of gluon distribution function in a proton using valence and s quark distributions measured in the same experiment with another physical proces A new region of 10^{-4}< x < 10^{-1} with 1.6x10^3< Q^2<10^5 ~(GeV/c)^2 can be covered. The rates of g c-> photon +Jet events are also given.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 It is shown that "photon+Jet" events, being collected at LHC, would provide us with the data sufficient for an extraction of gluon distribution function in a proton using valence and s quark distributions measured in the same experiment with another physical proces A new region of 10^{-4}< x < 10^{-1} with 1.6x10^3< Q^2<10^5 ~(GeV/c)^2 can be covered. result 0.54 0.68 0.87 asserted 0.89
s1 The rates of g c-> photon +Jet events are also given. result 0.86 0.80 0.07 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.58 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.39.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

It is shown that "photon+Jet" events, being collected at LHC, would provide us with the data sufficient for an extraction of gluon distribution function in a proton using valence and s quark distributions measured in the same experiment with another physical proces A new region of 10^{-4}< x < 10^{-1} with 1.6x10^3< Q^2<10^5 ~(GeV/c)^2 can be covered. The rates of g c-> photon +Jet events are also given.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.