Pith. Sign in

RECORD

photon+jet process application for setting the absolute scale of jet energy and determining the gluon distribution at the LHC

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
D. Bandurin, V. Konoplyanikov, N. Skachkov

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 15 Jul 2002

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The estimation of the number of photon+jet events suitable for determination of gluon distribution inside a proton in a new kinematic region of x, Q^2 variables beyond the one covered by HERA data is also presented.

how it is stated · asserted 0.97 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/0207034 (version 1)
Pith IDXONWJDC6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD. Bandurin, N. Skachkov, V. Konoplyanikov. "photon+jet process application for setting the absolute scale of jet energy and determining the gluon distribution at the LHC." arXiv:hep-ex/0207034 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/XONWJDC6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,301 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.10 · compares with prior results 0.20 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The possibility of jet energy scale setting at the CMS calorimeter by using photon+jet process is studied. The estimation of the number of photon+jet events suitable for determination of gluon distribution inside a proton in a new kinematic region of x, Q^2 variables beyond the one covered by HERA data is also presented.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The possibility of jet energy scale setting at the CMS calorimeter by using photon+jet process is studied. contribution 0.97 0.44 0.17 hedged possibility 0.93
s1 The estimation of the number of photon+jet events suitable for determination of gluon distribution inside a proton in a new kinematic region of x, Q^2 variables beyond the one covered by HERA data is also presented. contribution 0.91 0.77 0.18 asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.68 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.75.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The possibility of jet energy scale setting at the CMS calorimeter by using photon+jet process is studied. The estimation of the number of photon+jet events suitable for determination of gluon distribution inside a proton in a new kinematic region of x, Q^2 variables beyond the one covered by HERA data is also presented.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.