Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Measurement of Double Charmonium Production in $e^+e^-$ Annihilations at $\sqrt{s}=10.6$ GeV

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 24 Jun 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We observe signals for $\eta_c(1S)$, $\chi_{c0}$, and $\eta_c(2S)$ in the recoil mass distribution, thus confirming previous measurements.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/0506062 (version 3)
Pith IDV4E4P7QF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationB. Aubert, et al, The BABAR Collaboration. "Measurement of Double Charmonium Production in $e^+e^-$ Annihilations at $\sqrt{s}=10.6$ GeV." arXiv:hep-ex/0506062 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/V4E4P7QF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,556 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.58 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study $e^+e^-\to J/\psi c\bar{c}$ by measuring the invariant mass distribution recoiling against fully reconstructed $J/\psi$ decays, using 124 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected with a center-of-mass energy of 10.6 GeV with the $BaBar$ detector. We observe signals for $\eta_c(1S)$, $\chi_{c0}$, and $\eta_c(2S)$ in the recoil mass distribution, thus confirming previous measurements. We measure $\sigma(e^+e^-\to J/\psi+c\bar{c}) {\cal B} (c\bar{c} \to >2 \mathrm{charged})$ to be $17.6\pm2.8\textrm{(stat)}^{+1.5}_{-2.1}\textrm{(syst)}$ fb, $10.3\pm2.5\textrm{(stat)}^{+1.4}_{-1.8}\textrm{(syst)}$ fb, and $16.4\pm3.7\textrm{(stat)}^{+2.4}_{-3.0}\textrm{(syst)}$ fb with $c\bar{c}=\eta_c(1S)$, $\chi_{c0}$, and $\eta_c(2S)$, respectively.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study $e^+e^-\to J/\psi c\bar{c}$ by measuring the invariant mass distribution recoiling against fully reconstructed $J/\psi$ decays, using 124 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected with a center-of-mass energy of 10.6 GeV with the $BaBar$ detector. method 0.81 0.97 0.04 asserted 0.97
s1 We observe signals for $\eta_c(1S)$, $\chi_{c0}$, and $\eta_c(2S)$ in the recoil mass distribution, thus confirming previous measurements. result 0.97 0.90 0.24 asserted 1.00
s2 We measure $\sigma(e^+e^-\to J/\psi+c\bar{c}) {\cal B} (c\bar{c} \to >2 \mathrm{charged})$ to be $17.6\pm2.8\textrm{(stat)}^{+1.5}_{-2.1}\textrm{(syst)}$ fb, $10.3\pm2.5\textrm{(stat)}^{+1.4}_{-1.8}\textrm{(syst)}$ fb, and $16.4\pm3.7\textrm{(stat)}^{+2.4}_{-3.0}\textrm{(syst)}$ fb with $c\bar{c}=\eta_c(1S)$, $\chi_{c0}$, and $\eta_c(2S)$, respectively. result 1.00 0.97 0.64 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.89.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study $e^+e^-\to J/\psi c\bar{c}$ by measuring the invariant mass distribution recoiling against fully reconstructed $J/\psi$ decays, using 124 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected with a center-of-mass energy of 10.6 GeV with the $BaBar$ detector. We observe signals for $\eta_c(1S)$, $\chi_{c0}$, and $\eta_c(2S)$ in the recoil mass distribution, thus confirming previous measurements. We measure $\sigma(e^+e^-\to J/\psi+c\bar{c}) {\cal B} (c\bar{c} \to >2 \mathrm{charged})$ to be $17.6\pm2.8\textrm{(stat)}^{+1.5}_{-2.1}\textrm{(syst)}$ fb, $10.3\pm2.5\textrm{(stat)}^{+1.4}_{-1.8}\textrm{(syst)}$ fb, and $16.4\pm3.7\textrm{(stat)}^{+2.4}_{-3.0}\textrm{(syst)}$ fb with $c\bar{c}=\eta_c(1S)$, $\chi_{c0}$, and $\eta_c(2S)$, respectively.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

44 arXiv papers cite this in 58 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 36 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 9 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 2 papers
  • For example, in the case of double charmonia production at B-factories Belle and BaBar there is about an order of magnitude difference between LC and NRQCD results and only LC solves the long standing contradiction between theory and experiment [ref]

    Charmonia Production in $W\to (c\bar{c}) D_{s}^{(*)}$ Decays · Introduction · 0.96

  • Recently, however, an attempts were made to use it also for heavy quarkonia production at B-factories Belle and BaBar at $√(s_ee)=10.6$ GeV (see [ref] ) and agreement between obtained theoretical predictions and experimental data shows us that light-cone formalism can be used also to describe reactions with heavy quarkonium mesons.

    Double Charmonia Production in Exclusive $Z$ Boson Decays · Light Cone Expansion · 0.96

Cites it as background 9 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.