Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Study of the charmed baryonic decays $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{++}\bar{p}\pi^-$ and $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+$

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 9 Aug 2006

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We measure the branching fractions ${\cal B} (\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2455)^{++}\bar{p}\pi^-)$=$(2.1\pm0.2\pm0.3\pm0.5)\times 10^{-4}$, ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2455)^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+)$=$(1.4\pm0.2\pm0.2\pm0.4)\times1 0^{-4}$, ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2520)^{++} \bar{p}\pi^-)$=$(1.2\pm\0.1\pm0.2\pm0.3)\times10^{-4}$ with statistical significances of 13.1, 9.5 and 7.2 standard deviations, respectively.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/0608025 (version 6)
Pith IDPRVK6OZZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citationet al. (for the Belle Collaboration), H. Kichimi, K. S. Park. "Study of the charmed baryonic decays $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{++}\bar{p}\pi^-$ and $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+$." arXiv:hep-ex/0608025 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/PRVK6OZZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,376 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.42 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v6. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the three-body charmed baryonic decays $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{++} \bar{p}\pi^-$ and $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+$ in the four-body final state $\bar{B}^0\to\Lambda_c^{+}\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-$, using a data sample of 357 fb$^{-1}$ accumulated at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ collider. We measure the branching fractions ${\cal B} (\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2455)^{++}\bar{p}\pi^-)$=$(2.1\pm0.2\pm0.3\pm0.5)\times 10^{-4}$, ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2455)^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+)$=$(1.4\pm0.2\pm0.2\pm0.4)\times1 0^{-4}$, ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2520)^{++} \bar{p}\pi^-)$=$(1.2\pm\0.1\pm0.2\pm0.3)\times10^{-4}$ with statistical significances of 13.1, 9.5 and 7.2 standard deviations, respectively. The errors are statistical, systematic, and due to the uncertainty in ${\cal B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{p}K^-\pi^+)$, respectively. We also set an upper limit ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2520)^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+)<0.38\times10^{-4}$ at the 90% confidence level. In addition, we obtain a non-resonant branching fraction of $(6.4\pm0.4\pm\0.9\pm1.7)\times10^{-4}$, and a total branching fraction of $(11.2\pm0.5\pm1.4\pm2.9)\times10^{-4}$ for $\bar{B}^0\to\Lambda_c^{+}\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the three-body charmed baryonic decays $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{++} \bar{p}\pi^-$ and $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+$ in the four-body final state $\bar{B}^0\to\Lambda_c^{+}\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-$, using a data sample of 357 fb$^{-1}$ accumulated at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ collider. contribution 0.78 0.93 0.04 asserted 0.94
s1 We measure the branching fractions ${\cal B} (\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2455)^{++}\bar{p}\pi^-)$=$(2.1\pm0.2\pm0.3\pm0.5)\times 10^{-4}$, ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2455)^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+)$=$(1.4\pm0.2\pm0.2\pm0.4)\times1 0^{-4}$, ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2520)^{++} \bar{p}\pi^-)$=$(1.2\pm\0.1\pm0.2\pm0.3)\times10^{-4}$ with statistical significances of 13.1, 9.5 and 7.2 standard deviations, respectively. result 1.00 0.98 0.64 asserted 1.00
s2 The errors are statistical, systematic, and due to the uncertainty in ${\cal B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{p}K^-\pi^+)$, respectively. result 0.35 0.45 0.03 asserted 0.99
s3 We also set an upper limit ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2520)^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+)<0.38\times10^{-4}$ at the 90% confidence level. result 1.00 0.97 0.11 asserted 0.97
s4 In addition, we obtain a non-resonant branching fraction of $(6.4\pm0.4\pm\0.9\pm1.7)\times10^{-4}$, and a total branching fraction of $(11.2\pm0.5\pm1.4\pm2.9)\times10^{-4}$ for $\bar{B}^0\to\Lambda_c^{+}\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-$. result 1.00 0.97 0.20 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.59.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v6
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the three-body charmed baryonic decays $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{++} \bar{p}\pi^-$ and $\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+$ in the four-body final state $\bar{B}^0\to\Lambda_c^{+}\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-$, using a data sample of 357 fb$^{-1}$ accumulated at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ collider. We measure the branching fractions ${\cal B} (\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2455)^{++}\bar{p}\pi^-)$=$(2.1\pm0.2\pm0.3\pm0.5)\times 10^{-4}$, ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2455)^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+)$=$(1.4\pm0.2\pm0.2\pm0.4)\times1 0^{-4}$, ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2520)^{++} \bar{p}\pi^-)$=$(1.2\pm\0.1\pm0.2\pm0.3)\times10^{-4}$ with statistical significances of 13.1, 9.5 and 7.2 standard deviations, respectively. The errors are statistical, systematic, and due to the uncertainty in ${\cal B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{p}K^-\pi^+)$, respectively. We also set an upper limit ${\cal B}(\bar{B}^0\to\Sigma_c(2520)^{0}\bar{p}\pi^+)<0.38\times10^{-4}$ at the 90% confidence level. In addition, we obtain a non-resonant branching fraction of $(6.4\pm0.4\pm\0.9\pm1.7)\times10^{-4}$, and a total branching fraction of $(11.2\pm0.5\pm1.4\pm2.9)\times10^{-4}$ for $\bar{B}^0\to\Lambda_c^{+}\bar{p}\pi^+\pi^-$.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.