Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Differential cross sections for pion charge exchange on the proton at 27.5 MeV

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
E. Frlez, D. Pocanic, K. A. Assamagan, J. P. Chen, K. J. Keeter, R. M. Marshall, R. C. Minehart, L. C. Smith
show 4 more authors
G. E. Dodge, S. S. Hanna, B. H. King, J. N. Knudson

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 18 Dec 1997

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The extracted cross sections are compared with predictions of the standard pion-nucleon partial wave analysis and found to be in excellent agreement.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/9712024 (version 1)
Pith IDMGAVEYAC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationB. H. King, D. Pocanic, E. Frlez, G. E. Dodge, J. N. Knudson, J. P. Chen, K. A. Assamagan, K. J. Keeter, L. C. Smith, R. C. Minehart, R. M. Marshall, S. S. Hanna. "Differential cross sections for pion charge exchange on the proton at 27.5 MeV." arXiv:hep-ex/9712024 (1997). https://pith.science/paper/MGAVEYAC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,316 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.51 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We have measured pion single charge exchange differential cross sections on the proton at 27.5 MeV incident $\pi^-$ kinetic energy in the center of momentum angular range between $0^\circ$ and $55^\circ$. The extracted cross sections are compared with predictions of the standard pion-nucleon partial wave analysis and found to be in excellent agreement.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We have measured pion single charge exchange differential cross sections on the proton at 27.5 MeV incident $\pi^-$ kinetic energy in the center of momentum angular range between $0^\circ$ and $55^\circ$. contribution 0.86 0.98 0.08 asserted 1.00
s1 The extracted cross sections are compared with predictions of the standard pion-nucleon partial wave analysis and found to be in excellent agreement. result 0.74 0.93 0.77 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We have measured pion single charge exchange differential cross sections on the proton at 27.5 MeV incident $\pi^-$ kinetic energy in the center of momentum angular range between $0^\circ$ and $55^\circ$. The extracted cross sections are compared with predictions of the standard pion-nucleon partial wave analysis and found to be in excellent agreement.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.