Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Measurement of the $B\to D\ell\nu$ Branching Fractions and Form Factor

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 25 Nov 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find the decay rate $\Gamma(B \to D\ell\nu)$ = (14.1 +- 1.0 +- 1.2) ns-1 and derive branching fractions for $B^- \to D^0 \ell\nu$ and $\bar{B^0} \to D^+ \ell\nu$ of (2.32 +- 0.17 +- 0.20)% and 2.20 +- 0.16 +- 0.19)% respectively, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/9811042 (version 1)
Pith IDF6GUMAFP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citationet al. (CLEO Collaboration), J. Bartelt. "Measurement of the $B\to D\ell\nu$ Branching Fractions and Form Factor." arXiv:hep-ex/9811042 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/F6GUMAFP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,039 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Using a sample of 3.3 million B-meson decays collected with the CLEO detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring, we have studied $B^- \to D^0 \ell\nu$ and $\bar{B}^0 \to D^+ \ell\nu$ decays, where $\ell$ can be either an electron or muon. We distinguish $B \to D \ell\nu$ from other B semileptonic decays by examining the net momentum and energy of the particles recoiling against the D-lepton pairs. We find the decay rate $\Gamma(B \to D\ell\nu)$ = (14.1 +- 1.0 +- 1.2) ns-1 and derive branching fractions for $B^- \to D^0 \ell\nu$ and $\bar{B^0} \to D^+ \ell\nu$ of (2.32 +- 0.17 +- 0.20)% and 2.20 +- 0.16 +- 0.19)% respectively, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic. We also investigate the $B \to D \ell\nu$ form factor and the implication of the result for $|V_{cb}|$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Using a sample of 3.3 million B-meson decays collected with the CLEO detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring, we have studied $B^- \to D^0 \ell\nu$ and $\bar{B}^0 \to D^+ \ell\nu$ decays, where $\ell$ can be either an electron or muon. method 0.73 0.95 0.03 asserted 0.96
s1 We distinguish $B \to D \ell\nu$ from other B semileptonic decays by examining the net momentum and energy of the particles recoiling against the D-lepton pairs. method 1.00 0.92 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 We find the decay rate $\Gamma(B \to D\ell\nu)$ = (14.1 +- 1.0 +- 1.2) ns-1 and derive branching fractions for $B^- \to D^0 \ell\nu$ and $\bar{B^0} \to D^+ \ell\nu$ of (2.32 +- 0.17 +- 0.20)% and 2.20 +- 0.16 +- 0.19)% respectively, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic. result 1.00 0.98 0.77 asserted 1.00
s3 We also investigate the $B \to D \ell\nu$ form factor and the implication of the result for $|V_{cb}|$. contribution 0.89 0.89 0.07 asserted 0.68

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.86.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Using a sample of 3.3 million B-meson decays collected with the CLEO detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring, we have studied $B^- \to D^0 \ell\nu$ and $\bar{B}^0 \to D^+ \ell\nu$ decays, where $\ell$ can be either an electron or muon. We distinguish $B \to D \ell\nu$ from other B semileptonic decays by examining the net momentum and energy of the particles recoiling against the D-lepton pairs. We find the decay rate $\Gamma(B \to D\ell\nu)$ = (14.1 +- 1.0 +- 1.2) ns-1 and derive branching fractions for $B^- \to D^0 \ell\nu$ and $\bar{B^0} \to D^+ \ell\nu$ of (2.32 +- 0.17 +- 0.20)% and 2.20 +- 0.16 +- 0.19)% respectively, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic. We also investigate the $B \to D \ell\nu$ form factor and the implication of the result for $|V_{cb}|$.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 3 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
  • Apart from the slightly different treatment of external input parameters and correlations detailed above, the main differences to the HFLAV average in Ref. [ref] are the following, see Appendix [ref] for more details: * Corrected treatment of the branching fraction information from the CLEO measurements [ref] . * Consistent treatment of the inclusive branching ratio for used in Refs. [ref] . * Accounting for d'Agostini bias in Refs. [ref] and [ref] , as discussed above, see Fig. [ref]. * Inclusion of the Belle-II measurement [ref] , which supersedes the preliminary results given in the proceeding article [ref] .

    $\bar B\to D^{(*)}\ell\bar \nu$ Branching Ratios and Evidence for Isospin Breaking in $\Upsilon(4S)$ Decays · Treatment of common input parameters and correlations · 0.88

Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.