Pith. Sign in

RECORD

K_L -> pi^0 nu nubar at the AGS (E926)

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 11 Mar 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Backgrounds are suppressed to a level well below an anticipated signal in the range 3 x 10^{-11}.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/9903016 (version 1)
Pith IDZLGX4UMH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAkira Konaka (TRIUMF). "K_L -> pi^0 nu nubar at the AGS (E926)." arXiv:hep-ex/9903016 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/ZLGX4UMH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,559 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.64 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A proposed experiment to measure K_L -> pi^0 nu nubar at the AGS (E926) is described. It adopts a unique but general strategy of rare decay measurements with two independent rejection criteria, which allows reliable measurements of background levels. The method employs hermetic veto and full kinematic reconstruction using kaon time of flight and kinematic reconstruction of pi^0. Backgrounds are suppressed to a level well below an anticipated signal in the range 3 x 10^{-11}.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A proposed experiment to measure K_L -> pi^0 nu nubar at the AGS (E926) is described. contribution 0.97 0.33 0.09 asserted 0.96
s1 It adopts a unique but general strategy of rare decay measurements with two independent rejection criteria, which allows reliable measurements of background levels. method 0.96 0.52 0.11 asserted 1.00
s2 The method employs hermetic veto and full kinematic reconstruction using kaon time of flight and kinematic reconstruction of pi^0. method 1.00 0.44 0.05 asserted 1.00
s3 Backgrounds are suppressed to a level well below an anticipated signal in the range 3 x 10^{-11}. result 0.86 0.43 0.45 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.54 · evidence from argument 0.81.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A proposed experiment to measure K_L -> pi^0 nu nubar at the AGS (E926) is described. It adopts a unique but general strategy of rare decay measurements with two independent rejection criteria, which allows reliable measurements of background levels. The method employs hermetic veto and full kinematic reconstruction using kaon time of flight and kinematic reconstruction of pi^0. Backgrounds are suppressed to a level well below an anticipated signal in the range 3 x 10^{-11}.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.