Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Search for CP(T) Violation in B Decays at OPAL

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
R. Coxe (Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago)

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 12 Mar 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim A search for CP(T) violation is performed and the fractional difference between the $b$ and $\bar b$ hadron lifetimes is measured using reconstructed secondary vertices in inclusive B hadron decays culled from 3.1 million $Z^0 \to q \bar q$ events.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/9903018 (version 1)
Pith ID2A4XJCM6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationR. Coxe (Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago). "A Search for CP(T) Violation in B Decays at OPAL." arXiv:hep-ex/9903018 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/2A4XJCM6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,395 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.21 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.11 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A search for CP(T) violation is performed and the fractional difference between the $b$ and $\bar b$ hadron lifetimes is measured using reconstructed secondary vertices in inclusive B hadron decays culled from 3.1 million $Z^0 \to q \bar q$ events. The data were collected by the OPAL experiment at the LEP collider at CERN at $\sqrt{s} \approx 91$ GeV from 1991-1995.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A search for CP(T) violation is performed and the fractional difference between the $b$ and $\bar b$ hadron lifetimes is measured using reconstructed secondary vertices in inclusive B hadron decays culled from 3.1 million $Z^0 \to q \bar q$ events. contribution 0.95 0.96 0.13 asserted 1.00
s1 The data were collected by the OPAL experiment at the LEP collider at CERN at $\sqrt{s} \approx 91$ GeV from 1991-1995. method 0.99 0.51 0.02 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.84.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A search for CP(T) violation is performed and the fractional difference between the $b$ and $\bar b$ hadron lifetimes is measured using reconstructed secondary vertices in inclusive B hadron decays culled from 3.1 million $Z^0 \to q \bar q$ events. The data were collected by the OPAL experiment at the LEP collider at CERN at $\sqrt{s} \approx 91$ GeV from 1991-1995.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.