Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Non-compensation of the Barrel Combined Calorimeter Prototype

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Y. A. Kulchitsky (1, 2), M. V. Kuzmin (2) ((1) Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences, Minsk, Belarus; (2) JINR, Dubna, Russia)

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 5 Nov 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Found $e/h = 1.37\pm0.01\pm0.02$ is in good agreement with results from previous Combined Calorimeter test but has more precisions.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/9911007 (version 1)
Pith IDHBVFH54G, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citation2), Belarus; (2) JINR, Dubna, Minsk, M. V. Kuzmin (2) ((1) Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences, Russia), Y. A. Kulchitsky (1. "Non-compensation of the Barrel Combined Calorimeter Prototype." arXiv:hep-ex/9911007 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/HBVFH54G
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,989 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.17 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The e/$\pi$ ratio for the Barrel Combined Calorimeter Prototype, composed from electromagnetic LAr calorimeter and hadronic Tile calorimter was investigated. Response of Combined Calorimeter on pions and electrons in the energy region 20 - 300 GeV was studied. Found $e/h = 1.37\pm0.01\pm0.02$ is in good agreement with results from previous Combined Calorimeter test but has more precisions.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The e/$\pi$ ratio for the Barrel Combined Calorimeter Prototype, composed from electromagnetic LAr calorimeter and hadronic Tile calorimter was investigated. contribution 0.91 0.84 0.04 asserted 0.91
s1 Response of Combined Calorimeter on pions and electrons in the energy region 20 - 300 GeV was studied. contribution 0.57 0.91 0.04 asserted 0.98
s2 Found $e/h = 1.37\pm0.01\pm0.02$ is in good agreement with results from previous Combined Calorimeter test but has more precisions. result 0.99 0.92 0.78 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The e/$\pi$ ratio for the Barrel Combined Calorimeter Prototype, composed from electromagnetic LAr calorimeter and hadronic Tile calorimter was investigated. Response of Combined Calorimeter on pions and electrons in the energy region 20 - 300 GeV was studied. Found $e/h = 1.37\pm0.01\pm0.02$ is in good agreement with results from previous Combined Calorimeter test but has more precisions.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.