Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Search for Stimulated Neutrino Conversion with an RF Cavity

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 18 Nov 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Lifetimes can be constrained, or the process discovered, by a search for flavour conversion in a superconducting RF cavity installed in a neutrino beam.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.64 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/9911025 (version 1)
Pith IDAMEHP3BL, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationF. Vannucci. "Search for Stimulated Neutrino Conversion with an RF Cavity." arXiv:hep-ex/9911025 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/AMEHP3BL
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,566 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.16 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Little is known on radiative decays of numu and nutau. Lifetimes can be constrained, or the process discovered, by a search for flavour conversion in a superconducting RF cavity installed in a neutrino beam. The lifetimes tested with such a method can be of interest for astrophysics and cosmology. In particular the conjecture which explains both the LSND and the SuperKamiokande signals by radiative decays of numu can be straightforwardly put to the test.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Little is known on radiative decays of numu and nutau. gap 0.88 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.98
s1 Lifetimes can be constrained, or the process discovered, by a search for flavour conversion in a superconducting RF cavity installed in a neutrino beam. method 0.91 0.14 0.20 hedged possibility 0.64
s2 The lifetimes tested with such a method can be of interest for astrophysics and cosmology. interpretation 0.59 0.07 0.05 hedged possibility 0.53
s3 In particular the conjecture which explains both the LSND and the SuperKamiokande signals by radiative decays of numu can be straightforwardly put to the test. interpretation 0.41 0.08 0.10 hedged possibility 0.42

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.93 · evidence from argument 0.87.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Little is known on radiative decays of numu and nutau. Lifetimes can be constrained, or the process discovered, by a search for flavour conversion in a superconducting RF cavity installed in a neutrino beam. The lifetimes tested with such a method can be of interest for astrophysics and cosmology. In particular the conjecture which explains both the LSND and the SuperKamiokande signals by radiative decays of numu can be straightforwardly put to the test.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.