Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Non-compensation of an Electromagnetic Compartment of a Combined Calorimeter

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Y.A. Kulchitsky (1, 2), M.V. Kuzmin (1, V.B. Vinogradov (2) ((1) Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences, Minsk, Belarus, (2) JINR
show 2 more authors
Dubna, Russia)

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 23 Nov 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The $e/h$ ratio of $1.74\pm0.04$ has been determined on the basis of the 1996 combined calorimeter test beam data.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/9911033 (version 1)
Citation2), (2) JINR, Belarus, Dubna, Minsk, M.V. Kuzmin (1, National Academy of Sciences, Russia), V.B. Vinogradov (2) ((1) Institute of Physics, Y.A. Kulchitsky (1. "Non-compensation of an Electromagnetic Compartment of a Combined Calorimeter." arXiv:hep-ex/9911033 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/hep-ex/9911033
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,960 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.68 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The method of extraction of the $e/h$ ratio, the degree of non-compensation, of the electromagnetic compartment of the combined calorimeter is suggested. The $e/h$ ratio of $1.74\pm0.04$ has been determined on the basis of the 1996 combined calorimeter test beam data. This value agrees with the prediction that $e/h > 1.7$ for this electromagnetic calorimeter.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The method of extraction of the $e/h$ ratio, the degree of non-compensation, of the electromagnetic compartment of the combined calorimeter is suggested. method 0.63 0.64 0.13 hedged possibility 0.66
s1 The $e/h$ ratio of $1.74\pm0.04$ has been determined on the basis of the 1996 combined calorimeter test beam data. result 1.00 0.93 0.50 asserted 1.00
s2 This value agrees with the prediction that $e/h > 1.7$ for this electromagnetic calorimeter. interpretation 0.97 0.43 0.27 asserted 0.75

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.65 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.56.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The method of extraction of the $e/h$ ratio, the degree of non-compensation, of the electromagnetic compartment of the combined calorimeter is suggested. The $e/h$ ratio of $1.74\pm0.04$ has been determined on the basis of the 1996 combined calorimeter test beam data. This value agrees with the prediction that $e/h > 1.7$ for this electromagnetic calorimeter.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.