RECORD
Application of heavy-quark effective theory to lattice QCD: I. Power Corrections
High Energy Physics - Lattice · Submitted 7 Feb 2000
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Standard tools of HQET are used to develop heavy-quark expansions of lattice observables and, thus, to propagate heavy-quark discretization errors.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Heavy-quark effective theory (HQET) is applied to lattice QCD with Wilson fermions at fixed lattice spacing a. This description is possible because heavy-quark symmetries are respected. It is desirable because the ultraviolet cutoff $1/a$ in current numerical work and the heavy-quark mass $m_Q$ are comparable. Effects of both short distances, a and $1/m_Q$, are captured fully into coefficient functions, which multiply the operators of the usual HQET. Standard tools of HQET are used to develop heavy-quark expansions of lattice observables and, thus, to propagate heavy-quark discretization errors. Three explicit examples are given: namely, the mass, decay constant, and semileptonic form factors of heavy-light mesons.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Heavy-quark effective theory (HQET) is applied to lattice QCD with Wilson fermions at fixed lattice spacing a. | contribution 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | This description is possible because heavy-quark symmetries are respected. | background 0.57 | 0.15 | 0.07 | asserted 0.60 |
| s2 | It is desirable because the ultraviolet cutoff $1/a$ in current numerical work and the heavy-quark mass $m_Q$ are comparable. | background 0.91 | 0.14 | 0.08 | asserted 0.89 |
| s3 | Effects of both short distances, a and $1/m_Q$, are captured fully into coefficient functions, which multiply the operators of the usual HQET. | method 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.24 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | Standard tools of HQET are used to develop heavy-quark expansions of lattice observables and, thus, to propagate heavy-quark discretization errors. | method 0.96 | 0.76 | 0.15 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | Three explicit examples are given: namely, the mass, decay constant, and semileptonic form factors of heavy-light mesons. | contribution 0.95 | 0.86 | 0.10 | asserted 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Heavy-quark effective theory (HQET) is applied to lattice QCD with Wilson fermions at fixed lattice spacing a. This description is possible because heavy-quark symmetries are respected. It is desirable because the ultraviolet cutoff $1/a$ in current numerical work and the heavy-quark mass $m_Q$ are comparable. Effects of both short distances, a and $1/m_Q$, are captured fully into coefficient functions, which multiply the operators of the usual HQET. Standard tools of HQET are used to develop heavy-quark expansions of lattice observables and, thus, to propagate heavy-quark discretization errors. Three explicit examples are given: namely, the mass, decay constant, and semileptonic form factors of heavy-light mesons.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
27 arXiv papers cite this in 79 sentences
Papers citing it · 57 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 1 paper
-
This has been pursued in detail emphasizing heavy-light hadrons [ref] , and here we explain the ideas in the context of quarkonium.
Quarkonium mass splittings in three-flavor lattice QCD · Heavy quark formulation · 0.81
Uses its method or tool 10 papers
-
The HQET-Symanzik formalism used to define the $Z_J$ can also be used to control and suppress cutoff dependence [ref] .
B -> D* l nu at zero recoil: an update · Matching, blinding, and discretization effects · 0.88
-
Applying the theory of heavy-quark cutoff effects developed in Refs. [ref] , we estimate the size of these errors in Appendix [ref], providing in Tables [ref] and [ref] numerical results for the errors on $h_±(w)$ from mismatches in the lattice action and currents for a heavy-quark scale of $Λ̅=450$ MeV.
The $B \to D \ell \nu$ form factors at nonzero recoil and $|V_{cb}|$ from $2+1$-flavor lattice QCD · Heavy-quark discretization errors · 0.97
-
As in earlier work [ref] , we define [equation] where {$𝒱$, $𝒯$} and {$V$, $T$} are the continuum and lattice current operators, respectively.
$B\to Kl^+l^-$ decay form factors from three-flavor lattice QCD · Definition of currents · 0.92
Uses its data or values 1 paper
-
We proceed by collecting results from Ref. [ref] for the zero-recoil discretization errors in matrix elements of the currents in Eqs. ([ref]) and ([ref]) and combining them into a formula for the discretization error in $j√(R_A_1)$.
Update of $|V_{cb}|$ from the $\bar{B}\to D^*\ell\bar{\nu}$ form factor at zero recoil with three-flavor lattice QCD · Heavy-quark Discretization Effects · 0.89
Cites it as background 4 papers
-
The current improvement to first order in $λ$ was studied in [ref] .
Improvement of heavy-heavy and heavy-light currents with the Oktay-Kronfeld action · Improvement terms for the lattice heavy quark currents · 0.87
-
For more details, the reader may consult earlier work [ref] or a pedagogical review [ref] .
New lattice action for heavy quarks · Effective Field Theory · 1.00
-
The Fermilab action is applicable to both heavy-light systems and quarkonia, with suitable power counting: HQET power counting [ref] for heavy-light systems and NRQCD for quarkonia [ref] .
Heavy-quark meson spectrum tests of the Oktay-Kronfeld action · Introduction · 0.95
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.