REVIEW 1 cited by
Heavy and Light Quarks with Lattice Chiral Fermions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The feasibility of using lattice chiral fermions which are free of $O(a)$ errors for both the heavy and light quarks is examined. The fact that the effective quark propagators in these fermions have the same form as that in the continuum with the quark mass being only an additive parameter to a chirally symmetric antihermitian Dirac operator is highlighted. This implies that there is no distinction between the heavy and light quarks and no mass dependent tuning of the action or operators as long as the discretization error $O(m^2 a^2)$ is negligible. Using the overlap fermion, we find that the $O(m^2a^2)$ (and $O(ma^2)$) errors in the dispersion relations of the pseudoscalar and vector mesons and the renormalization of the axial-vector current and scalar density are small. This suggests that the applicable range of $ma$ may be extended to $\sim 0.56$ with only 5% error, which is a factor of $\sim 2.4$ larger than that of the improved Wilson action. We show that the generalized Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation with unequal masses can be utilized to determine the finite $ma$ errors in the renormalization of the matrix elements for the heavy-light decay constants and semileptonic decay constants of the B/D meson.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Realization of all-to-all fermion propagator for the first principle high accuracy strong interaction prediction
A new stochastic estimator, blending distillation low modes with reweighted random high modes, gives unbiased all-to-all fermion propagators and enables sub-percent nucleon axial charge and 4-point pion form factor ca...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.