Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Gluon propagator and confinement scenario in Coulomb gauge

High Energy Physics - Lattice · Submitted 4 Sep 2002

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim They are consistent with a linearly rising color-Coulomb potential V_{coul}(R).

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-lat/0209068 (version 1)
Pith IDSSJJUDR5, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAttilio Cucchieri, Daniel Zwanziger. "Gluon propagator and confinement scenario in Coulomb gauge." arXiv:hep-lat/0209068 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/SSJJUDR5
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,592 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.41 · compares with prior results 0.26 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present numerical results in SU(2) lattice gauge theory for the instantaneous part of the gluon propagator in Coulomb gauge D_{44, inst} = V_{coul}(R) \delta(t). Data are taken on lattice volumes 24^4 and 28^4 for 7 values of beta in the interval $2.2 \leq beta \leq 2.8$. The data are confronted with the confinement scenario in Coulomb gauge. They are consistent with a linearly rising color-Coulomb potential V_{coul}(R).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present numerical results in SU(2) lattice gauge theory for the instantaneous part of the gluon propagator in Coulomb gauge D_{44, inst} = V_{coul}(R) \delta(t). contribution 0.91 0.96 0.09 asserted 0.99
s1 Data are taken on lattice volumes 24^4 and 28^4 for 7 values of beta in the interval $2.2 \leq beta \leq 2.8$. method 1.00 0.94 0.02 asserted 0.98
s2 The data are confronted with the confinement scenario in Coulomb gauge. contribution 0.48 0.66 0.06 asserted 0.71
s3 They are consistent with a linearly rising color-Coulomb potential V_{coul}(R). interpretation 0.62 0.87 0.81 hedged possibility 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present numerical results in SU(2) lattice gauge theory for the instantaneous part of the gluon propagator in Coulomb gauge D_{44, inst} = V_{coul}(R) \delta(t). Data are taken on lattice volumes 24^4 and 28^4 for 7 values of beta in the interval $2.2 \leq beta \leq 2.8$. The data are confronted with the confinement scenario in Coulomb gauge. They are consistent with a linearly rising color-Coulomb potential V_{coul}(R).

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.