Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

$J/\psi$ and $\eta_c$ in the Deconfined Plasma from Lattice QCD

High Energy Physics - Lattice · Submitted 28 Aug 2003 · 22 references

Pith's verdict: The Nτ=46 lattice makes the survival claim credible; the 1.87 Tc null is the softer half of the bracket and the prior-shape scan is asserted rather than shown.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 9 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-lat/0308034 (version 2)
Pith ID2JP6WUJO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationM. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda. "$J/\psi$ and $\eta_c$ in the Deconfined Plasma from Lattice QCD." arXiv:hep-lat/0308034 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/2JP6WUJO
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

Lattice spectral functions show the charmonium bound states $J/ψ$ and $η_c$ surviving as sharp peaks in the deconfined plasma up to about $1.6$ times the critical temperature, then vanishing by $1.9$ times it.

The reading

The paper asks a question that sits at the centre of heavy-ion physics: once quarks and gluons deconfine, can a heavy quark and its antiquark still hold together as a bound state? The authors compute the imaginary-time correlation functions of the charmonium operators for $J/ψ$ (vector) and $η_c$ (pseudoscalar) in quenched lattice QCD on anisotropic $32^3×(32-96)$ lattices, then invert them with the maximum entropy method (MEM) to recover the spectral function $A(ω)$, the object that carries in-medium mass and width. They report a sharp peak near the zero-temperature mass at $T=1.38T_c$ and $T=1.62T_c$, and no such peak at $T=1.87T_c$ or $2.33T_c$. If that reading holds, the deconfined medium just above $T_c$ is still strongly interacting enough to bind charm, so charmonium melting is a gradual thermal effect rather than something tied to the phase transition itself.

What carries the argument

The engine is the maximum entropy method applied to finite-temperature lattice correlators. The spectral function enters through $D(τ) = ∫_0^∞ K(τ,ω)A(ω)dω$ with the continuum kernel $K(τ,ω) = (e^{-τω}+e^{-(1/T-τ)ω})/(1-e^{-ω/T})$, an integral equation with infinitely many solutions at finite $N_{data}$. MEM picks the most probable one by maximising $P[A|D] ∝ e^{αS-L}$, where $L$ is the likelihood and $S$ is the Shannon–Jaynes entropy relative to a default model $m(ω)$ fixed from the perturbative high-frequency behaviour of $A(ω)$. The parameter $α$ is integrated out by Bayes' theorem, and the error on $A(ω)$ comes from the second variation of $P[A|D]$. The other half of the machinery is the anisotropic lattice itself: $ξ = a_σ/a_τ = 4.0$ at $β=7.0$ gives $a_τ ≈ 0.00975$ fm, which is what allows $N_τ$ as large as 46 at $1.62T_c$ and therefore enough temporal points for the inversion to be controlled.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that $J/ψ$ and $η_c$ persist as distinct resonances in the quark-gluon plasma up to $T ≃ 1.6T_c$ and dissociate between $1.6T_c$ and $1.9T_c$. The evidence is a sequence of MEM-reconstructed spectral functions at $T/T_c = 0.78, 1.38, 1.62, 1.87, 2.33$ on lattices with temporal extent $N_τ = 96, 54, 46, 40, 32$ respectively, keeping the number of temporal data points $N_{data}$ as large as 89 down to 25. The authors stress two reliability tests. First, the MEM error bars show that the peak at $1.62T_c$ is statistically significant and that its absence at the same frequency at $1.87T_c$ is also statistically significant. Second, truncating the data set from $N_{data}=39$ to $34$ at $1.62T_c$, and from $33$ to $26$ at $1.87T_c$, leaves the spectral functions essentially unchanged, which rules out the qualitative change being an artefact of too few time slices. They also note what they cannot yet claim: the observed peak width is dominated by statistical broadening of a few hundred MeV, so no definite statement about thermal mass shift or physical broadening is made, and the second and third peaks at lower temperature may be fermion-doubler artefacts whose $1/a_σ$ scaling remains untested.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the maximum-entropy reconstruction is faithful at low frequency, so that the presence or absence of a peak reflects the medium rather than the Bayesian prior: the default model is fixed in functional form to the perturbative high-frequency behaviour, and the $N_{data}$ test varies how many time slices enter but never the shape of that prior.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Charmonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions becomes a thermometer of how far above $T_c$ the medium actually sits, rather than a binary signal of deconfinement.
  • The melting temperature of a quarkonium state depends on its binding energy, so the same lattice machinery predicts an ordered sequence of dissociation temperatures across the upsilon and charmonium families.
  • A plasma that still binds heavy quarks at $1.6T_c$ must be described by strongly coupled rather than weakly coupled quasi-particle pictures in that temperature window.
  • The paper sets a minimum standard for finite-temperature MEM work: a temporal lattice too short to pass the $N_{data}$ stability test cannot support claims about peaks appearing or disappearing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The obvious next check is the one the authors flag as future work: repeat the analysis with dynamical quarks, since a quenched plasma lacks light-quark screening and would if anything overstate how long charmonium survives.
  • Because the default model is fixed in shape and only its normalisation is scanned, a natural extension is to vary the functional form of $m(ω)$ and see whether the $1.62T_c$ peak and its $1.87T_c$ absence move together or separately; that would convert the current prior choice into a controlled systematic error.
  • The peak-position versus $1/a_σ$ scaling test the authors propose for the higher peaks would also give a clean way to separate genuine in-medium structure from lattice doublers in the low-frequency region.
  • If the surviving states are real, they should leave a measurable imprint in the spatial profile of the correlator, so extracting the in-medium Bethe-Salpeter amplitude on the same configurations is a direct consistency check.
Original abstract

Analyzing correlation functions of charmonia at finite temperature ($T$) on $32^3\times(32-96)$ anisotropic lattices by the maximum entropy method (MEM), we find that $J/\psi$ and $\eta_c$ survive as distinct resonances in the plasma even up to $T \simeq 1.6 T_c$ and that they eventually dissociate between $1.6 T_c$ and $1.9 T_c$ ($T_c$ is the critical temperature of deconfinement). This suggests that the deconfined plasma is non-perturbative enough to hold heavy-quark bound states. The importance of having sufficient number of temporal data points in MEM analyses is also emphasized.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,081 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.78 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Analyzing correlation functions of charmonia at finite temperature ($T$) on $32^3\times(32-96)$ anisotropic lattices by the maximum entropy method (MEM), we find that $J/\psi$ and $\eta_c$ survive as distinct resonances in the plasma even up to $T \simeq 1.6 T_c$ and that they eventually dissociate between $1.6 T_c$ and $1.9 T_c$ ($T_c$ is the critical temperature of deconfinement). This suggests that the deconfined plasma is non-perturbative enough to hold heavy-quark bound states. The importance of having sufficient number of temporal data points in MEM analyses is also emphasized.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Analyzing correlation functions of charmonia at finite temperature ($T$) on $32^3\times(32-96)$ anisotropic lattices by the maximum entropy method (MEM), we find that $J/\psi$ and $\eta_c$ survive as distinct resonances in the plasma even up to $T \simeq 1.6 T_c$ and that they eventually dissociate between $1.6 T_c$ and $1.9 T_c$ ($T_c$ is the critical temperature of deconfinement). result 0.99 0.97 0.94 asserted 1.00
s1 This suggests that the deconfined plasma is non-perturbative enough to hold heavy-quark bound states. interpretation 1.00 0.34 0.16 hedged possibility 1.00
s2 The importance of having sufficient number of temporal data points in MEM analyses is also emphasized. limitation 0.44 0.37 0.03 asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Spectral functions for
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Spectral functions for

Showing 2 of the paper's 3 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:hep-lat/0308034 by the authors.

References
How later papers used it

68 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 66 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 8 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 15 of the 90 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Uses its data or values 1 of 3 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors

By the same authors

Cites it as support 2 papers
  • Said its conclusion was supported by calculations of Minkowski-space spectral functions in lattice-regularized QCD in this paper.

    Prediction of a Photon Peak in Heavy Ion Collisions (2008) · 1.00 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

  • Said its first property was supported by calculations of Minkowski-space spectral functions in lattice-regularized QCD in this paper.

    Cherenkov mesons as in-medium quark energy loss (2010) · 0.98 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

61 arXiv papers cite this in 82 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 2 papers
  • Analyzing correlation functions of charmonia at finite temperature ($T$) on $32^3\times(32-96)$ anisotropic lattices by the maximum entropy method (MEM), we find that $J/\psi$ and $\eta_c$ survive as distinct resonances in the plasma even up to $T \simeq 1.6 T_c$ and that they eventually dissociate between $1.6 T_c$ and $1.9 T_c$ ($T_c$ is the critical temperature of deconfinement).

    Charmonia above the Deconfinement Phase Transition · 1.00

  • J/psi and eta_c are found to survive well into the deconfined phase before melting away at T<~2T_c.

    Mesons at high temperature in Nf=2 QCD · 0.84

States a conflicting result 2 papers

Papers citing it · 50 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • This seems to contradict the conclusions made in Refs. [ref] , where the analysis of the spectral function using the MEM indicated that the first peak survives.

    Can quarkonia survive deconfinement ? · Numerical results with the potential $V(r,T)$ · contest 0.86

Uses its data or values 3 papers
Compares with it 4 papers
  • The results are consistent with previous lattice studies of charmonium spectral functions [ref] , in which the spectral functions for the Ps and V channels in the deconfinement phase (but at not so high temperature) show a peak structure around the $η_c$ and $J/ψ$ masses like the result at zero temperature.

    Study of constant mode in charmonium correlators at finite temperature · Finite temperature results · 0.87

  • This coincides with the thermal properties of heavy quarkonia observed by model calculation and lattice numerical studies [ref] , but different from the observation of a previous lattice study on glueballs where the observed pole-mass reduction start even at $T≃0.8 T_c$ [ref] .

    A Quenched Study of SU(3) Glueballs at Finite Temperature · Results of the single-cosh fit · 0.93

  • Lattice results in the quenched approximation, in contrast, suggest a scaling of the transition temperature of meson destabilization with the transition temperature for the gauge fields $T_fund∝T_gauge$ [ref] .

    In-medium effects in the holographic quark-gluon plasma · Confinement/deconfinement · 0.93

Cites it as support 2 papers
  • This conclusion is supported by calculations of both the static quark-antiquark potential [ref] and of Minkowski-space spectral functions in lattice-regularized QCD [ref] .

    Prediction of a Photon Peak in Heavy Ion Collisions · Introduction · 1.00

  • The first property is suggested by the fact that sufficiently heavy mesons are smaller than the screening length in the plasma [ref] , and is supported by calculations of both the static quark-antiquark potential [ref] and of Minkowski-space spectral functions in lattice-regularized QCD [ref] .[In some models light mesons also remain bound above $T_c$ by Coulomb-like forces [ref] .] The second property, which goes back to ref.

    Cherenkov mesons as in-medium quark energy loss · Phenomenological implications for HIC experiments · 0.98

Cites it as background 20 papers

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.