Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Charming Penguins Strike Back

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-ph/0104126 v1 pith:SWKKAZ6L submitted 2001-04-12 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords charmingexperimentalfactorizationlargepenguinstheoreticalviolationaccount
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

By using the recent experimental measurements of B to pi pi and B to K pi branching ratios, we find that factorization is unable to reproduce the observed BRs even taking into account the uncertainties of the input parameters. Charming and GIM penguins allow to reconcile the theoretical predictions with the data. Because of these large effects, we conclude, however, that it is not possible, with the present theoretical and experimental accuracy, to determine the CP violation angle gamma from these decays. Contrary to factorization, we predict large asymmetries for several of the particle-antiparticle BRs, in particular BR(B^+ to K^+ pi^0), BR(B_d to K^+ pi^-) and BR(B_d to pi^+ pi^-). This opens new perspectives for the study of CP violation in B systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Large Vision-Language Models Understand Multimodal Sarcasm?

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Large vision-language models are reported to be weak at multimodal sarcasm, and a training-free knowledge-augmented framework is claimed to improve sarcasm detection and explanation.

Pith tools