REVIEW 4 cited by
Rhad: A program for the evaluation of the hadronic R-ratio in the perturbative regime of QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper describes the fortran program rhad which performs a numerical evaluation of the photon-induced hadronic R-ratio, R(s), related to the cross section for electron-positron annihilation, for a given center-of-mass energy \sqrt{s}. In rhad the state-of-the-art perturbative corrections to R(s) are implemented and the running and decoupling of the strong coupling constant and the quark masses is automatically treated consistently. Several options allow for a flexible use of the program.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
On the extraction of $\alpha_\textit{em}(m_Z^2)$ at Tera-$Z$
Forward-region Bhabha ratios at Tera-Z could extract alpha_em(m_Z^2) with a projected statistical sensitivity of about 6e-6, below the current bottleneck.
-
Long distance effects in inclusive rare $B$ decays and phenomenology of $\bar{B}\to X_d \ell^+\ell^-$
A new Standard Model prediction for the inclusive \bar B -> X_d \ell^+\ell^- decay that incorporates charmonium resonances, resolved power corrections, QED logarithms, and five-body contributions.
-
Strange and charm quark contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment in lattice QCD with twisted-mass fermions
In isospin-symmetric QCD, lattice QCD gives the quark-connected strange and charm HVP contributions to the muon g-2 as 53.57(63) x 10^-10 and 14.56(13) x 10^-10.
-
The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model
The Standard Model value for the muon anomalous magnetic moment is 116591810(43)×10^{-11}, 3.7σ below the Brookhaven experimental measurement.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.