REVIEW 2 cited by
$J/\psi + c + \bar{c}$ Photoproduction in $e^+ e^-$ Scattering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We investigate the $J/\psi$ + c + $\bar{c}$ photoproduction in $e^+ e^-$ collision at the LEP II energy. The physical motivations for this study are: 1) such next-to-leading order(NLO) process was not considered in previous investigations of $J/\psi$ photoproduction in $e^+ e^-$ interaction, and it is worthwhile to do so in order to make sound predictions for experimental comparison; 2) from recent Belle experiment results, the process with same final states at the $B$ factory has a theoretically yet unexplainable large fraction; hence it is interesting to see what may happen at other colliders; 3) the existing LEP data are marginal in observing such process, and at the planed Linear Colliders(LCs) this process can be measured with high accuracy; 4) it is necessary to take this process into consideration in the aim of elucidating the quarkonium production mechanism, especially in testing the universality of NRQCD nonperturbative matrix elements via $J/\psi$ photoproduction in electron-position collisions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
$J/\psi$ Polarization and $p_T$ distribution in $c\ \!\bar{c}$ associated hadroproduction at $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s^5)$
The gluon-gluon fusion process gg -> J/psi + c cbar is computed at NLO QCD, with large corrections, nearly unpolarized J/psi, and improved agreement with LHC data, while a normalization gap of about an order of magnit...
-
Charmonium pair production in ultraperipheral collision
NLO NRQCD predictions for exclusive J/psi pair and eta_c pair production in ultraperipheral Pb-Pb and p-p collisions at HL-LHC and FCC energies, plus Low-formula estimates for the X(6900) state.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.