Pith. Sign in

RECORD

"Classical" instabilities and "quantum" speed-up in the evolution of neutrino clouds

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 24 Aug 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Turning to the more complete case in which we do not assume the classical factorization, but instead solve for the evolution under the influence of the full "forward" Hamiltonian, we find the possibility of rapid evolution, under our definition, even when there is no seeding from conventional neutrino mixing.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.87 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0408265 (version 1)
Pith IDWRYUQLMA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationR. F. Sawyer. ""Classical" instabilities and "quantum" speed-up in the evolution of neutrino clouds." arXiv:hep-ph/0408265 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/WRYUQLMA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,136 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.25 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.21 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.74 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study some examples of collective behavior in neutrino clouds governed by the neutral-current neutrino-neutrino interaction. The standard equations for analyzing such systems are rederived in a two-step process: first, a replacement of the full interaction Hamiltonian with a "forward" Hamiltonian that contains only the momentum states that were initially occupied by a neutrino of one flavor or another; second, a factorization assumption that reduces the time evolution problem to the solution of coupled equations for the expectations of various bilinear forms in the neutrino fields. We designate the latter as the "classical" equations. We analyze some solutions of these equations in cases in which the initial momentum and flavor distributions of neutrinos are strongly anisotropic in space. In some cases we find an instability that leads to rapid evolution of the flavor-angle distribution, even when it is seeded by a very small initial flavor mixing (or alternatively by a very small neutrino mass$^2$ term). Turning to the more complete case in which we do not assume the classical factorization, but instead solve for the evolution under the influence of the full "forward" Hamiltonian, we find the possibility of rapid evolution, under our definition, even when there is no seeding from conventional neutrino mixing.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study some examples of collective behavior in neutrino clouds governed by the neutral-current neutrino-neutrino interaction. contribution 0.89 0.90 0.04 asserted 0.94
s1 The standard equations for analyzing such systems are rederived in a two-step process: first, a replacement of the full interaction Hamiltonian with a "forward" Hamiltonian that contains only the momentum states that were initially occupied by a neutrino of one flavor or another; second, a factorization assumption that reduces the time evolution problem to the solution of coupled equations for the expectations of various bilinear forms in the neutrino fields. method 0.97 0.85 0.05 asserted 0.99
s2 We designate the latter as the "classical" equations. method 0.91 0.82 0.04 asserted 0.97
s3 We analyze some solutions of these equations in cases in which the initial momentum and flavor distributions of neutrinos are strongly anisotropic in space. contribution 0.50 0.87 0.05 asserted 0.81
s4 In some cases we find an instability that leads to rapid evolution of the flavor-angle distribution, even when it is seeded by a very small initial flavor mixing (or alternatively by a very small neutrino mass$^2$ term). result 1.00 0.95 0.23 asserted 0.99
s5 Turning to the more complete case in which we do not assume the classical factorization, but instead solve for the evolution under the influence of the full "forward" Hamiltonian, we find the possibility of rapid evolution, under our definition, even when there is no seeding from conventional neutrino mixing. result 0.99 0.95 0.43 hedged possibility 0.87

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.90 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.68.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study some examples of collective behavior in neutrino clouds governed by the neutral-current neutrino-neutrino interaction. The standard equations for analyzing such systems are rederived in a two-step process: first, a replacement of the full interaction Hamiltonian with a "forward" Hamiltonian that contains only the momentum states that were initially occupied by a neutrino of one flavor or another; second, a factorization assumption that reduces the time evolution problem to the solution of coupled equations for the expectations of various bilinear forms in the neutrino fields. We designate the latter as the "classical" equations. We analyze some solutions of these equations in cases in which the initial momentum and flavor distributions of neutrinos are strongly anisotropic in space. In some cases we find an instability that leads to rapid evolution of the flavor-angle distribution, even when it is seeded by a very small initial flavor mixing (or alternatively by a very small neutrino mass$^2$ term). Turning to the more complete case in which we do not assume the classical factorization, but instead solve for the evolution under the influence of the full "forward" Hamiltonian, we find the possibility of rapid evolution, under our definition, even when there is no seeding from conventional neutrino mixing.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

24 arXiv papers cite this in 43 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 26 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • The models considered in [ref] , and described in more detail in Sec. [ref] below, give rise to fast oscillations with times scaling as $τ_F$ by introducing however an unphysical perturbation that breaks the $SU(2)$ invariance of the neutrino Hamiltonian in Eq. [ref].

    Dynamical Phase Transitions in models of Collective Neutrino Oscillations · Introduction · contest 0.73

Compares with it 1 paper
  • This simulation strategy is used here with two main goals, the first one was to validate the early small scale simulations by Sawyer et al. [ref] which, correctly, predicted flavor evolution to occur (in their model) at a fast time-scale $τ_F≈μ^-1log(N)$.

    Dynamical Phase Transitions in models of Collective Neutrino Oscillations · Summary and Conclusions · 0.86

Cites it as background 14 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.