REVIEW 1 cited by
Equivalence of Dimensional Reduction and Dimensional Regularisation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
For some years there has been uncertainty over whether regularisation by dimensional reduction (DRED) is viable for non-supersymmetric theories. We resolve this issue by showing that DRED is entirely equivalent to standard dimensional regularisation (DREG), to all orders in perturbation theory and for a general renormalisable theory. The two regularisation schemes are related by an analytic redefinition of the couplings, under which the $\b$-functions calculated using DRED transform into those computed in DREG. The $S$-matrix calculated using DRED is numerically equal to the DREG version, ensuring that both schemes give the same physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bare effective potential and Goldstone boson anti-resummation
Treating Goldstone-boson squared masses as interaction vertices instead of propagator masses eliminates spurious infrared logarithms and imaginary parts, giving a consistent three-loop tadpole-free effective potential...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.