REVIEW 3 cited by
Magnetic Field Dependence of Muonium-antimuonium Conversion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We study the magnetic field dependence of muonium--antimuonium conversion induced by neutral (pseudo)scalar bosons. Only the $SS$ operator contributes to the conversion of polarized muonium, but it gets quenched by a magnetic field of strength 0.1 Gauss or stronger. Conversion induced by $SS$ couplings for unpolarized muonium is independent of magnetic field. Magnetic fields of 0.1 Tesla or stronger starts to suppress conversion induced by $PP$ interactions in the lowest Breit-Rabi level, but gets partially compensated by a rise in conversion probability in the other unpolarized level. The effects of $(S\mp P)(S\mp P)$ and $(S\mp P)(S\pm P)$ operators behave in the same way as $(V\mp A)(V\mp A)$ and $(V\mp A)(V\pm A)$ operators, respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Lepton flavor violating decay of true muonium: $\boldsymbol{(\mu^+ \mu^-) \to \mu^\pm e^\mp}$
True muonium could decay into a muon and an electron with branching ratio up to 10^-20, giving a new probe of charged lepton flavor violation.
-
Probing flavor-diagonal couplings of doubly-charged scalar at low and high energies
Flavor-diagonal couplings of a TeV-scale right-handed doubly-charged scalar in the LRSM could be probed down to ~10^-2 by combining low-energy precision measurements with future lepton colliders.
-
Positron Transport System for Muonium-to-Antimuonium Conversion Experiment
Simulations of the positron transport system for MACE report 65.81% geometric acceptance, 88 by 102 micrometer position resolution, and 6.9 ns transit time spread enabling 10 to the minus 7 background rejection.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.