REVIEW 1 cited by
The $\xi(2220)$ Revistited
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We calculated the decay widths of the $1^3F_2$ and $1^3F_4$ $s\bar{s}$ mesons and compared them to the measured properties of the $\xi(2220)$ (now known as the $f_4(2220)$). Including previously neglected decay modes we found that the width of the $^3F_2$ state $s\bar{s}$ meson is much larger than previously believed making this explanation unlikely. On the other hand the predicted width of the $^3F_4$ state, although broader than the observed width, is consistent within the uncertainties of the model. This interpretation predicts large partial widths to $K K^*(892)$ and $K^*(892) K^*(892)$ final states which should be looked for. A second possibility that would account for the different properties of the $\xi(2220)$ seen in different experiments is that two hadronic states exist at this mass. The first would be a broader $^3F_4$ $s\bar{s}$ state which is seen in hadron beam experiments while the second would be a narrow state with high glue content seen in the gluon rich $J/\psi$ radiative decay. Further experimental results are needed to sort this out.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Hadronic decay of vector charmonium from the lattice
The ratio method, tuned with twisted boundary conditions, extracts a psi(3770) -> D D mixing amplitude from two N_f=2 ensembles and gives Gamma = 24.2(6.4) MeV, but with unquantified systematic errors.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.