Recognition: unknown
The xi(2220) Revistited
read the original abstract
We calculated the decay widths of the $1^3F_2$ and $1^3F_4$ $s\bar{s}$ mesons and compared them to the measured properties of the $\xi(2220)$ (now known as the $f_4(2220)$). Including previously neglected decay modes we found that the width of the $^3F_2$ state $s\bar{s}$ meson is much larger than previously believed making this explanation unlikely. On the other hand the predicted width of the $^3F_4$ state, although broader than the observed width, is consistent within the uncertainties of the model. This interpretation predicts large partial widths to $K K^*(892)$ and $K^*(892) K^*(892)$ final states which should be looked for. A second possibility that would account for the different properties of the $\xi(2220)$ seen in different experiments is that two hadronic states exist at this mass. The first would be a broader $^3F_4$ $s\bar{s}$ state which is seen in hadron beam experiments while the second would be a narrow state with high glue content seen in the gluon rich $J/\psi$ radiative decay. Further experimental results are needed to sort this out.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Comparing relativistic and non-relativistic quark pair creation models
Relativistic and non-relativistic QPC models produce strong decay width predictions of similar overall quality for light mesons, with the relativistic version exhibiting stronger suppression at high energies.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.