REVIEW 1 cited by
How Well Do We (and Will We) Know Solar Neutrino Fluxes and Oscillation Parameters?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Assuming neutrino oscillations occur, the pp electron neutrino flux is uncertain by at least a factor of two, the ${\rm ^8B}$ flux by a factor of five, and the ${\rm ^7Be}$ flux by a factor of forty-five. Calculations of the expected results of future solar neutrino experiments (SuperKamiokande, SNO, BOREXINO, ICARUS, HELLAZ, and HERON) are used to illustrate the extent to which these experiments will restrict the range of the allowed neutrino mixing parameters. We present an improved formulation of the ``luminosity constraint'' and show that at 95\% confidence limit this constraint establishes the best available limits on the rate of creation of pp neutrinos in the solar interior and provides the best upper limit to the ${\rm ^7Be}$ neutrino flux.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Solar Model Independent Constraints on the Sterile Neutrino Interpretation of the Gallium Anomaly
A global analysis of solar and KamLAND neutrino data finds that the sterile-neutrino explanation of the gallium anomaly remains disfavored at about 3 sigma or higher under all reasonable modeling assumptions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.