Naturalness of supersymmetric models
read the original abstract
After presenting a simple procedure for testing naturalness (similar to Bayesian inference and not more subjective than it) we show that LEP2 experiments pose a naturalness problem for `conventional' supersymmetric models. About 95% of the parameter space of minimal supergravity MSSM is excluded by LEP2 experiments. Moreover in this model electroweak baryogenesis, or detectable supersymmetric corrections to mixing of K and B mesons, are possible only in very small corners of the parameter space. The naturalness problem is stronger in gauge mediation models, expecially with light messengers. We recall some possible explanations (different from an improbable numerical accident) of why supersymmetry has not (yet?) been found.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
It's all in your head -- fine-tuning arguments do not require aleatoric uncertainty
Bayesian statistics supplies an automatic Occam's razor that penalizes unnatural models needing precise fine-tuning to agree with data, justifying naturalness arguments without aleatoric uncertainty.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.