Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Distinguishing anomaly mediation from gauge mediation with a Wino NLSP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-ph/9909376 v2 pith:VPK2D2V7 submitted 1999-09-14 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords anomalymassmediationdistinguishinggaugegauge-mediatedgauginomasses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A striking consequence of supersymmetry breaking communicated purely via the superconformal anomaly is that the gaugino masses are proportional to the gauge beta functions. This result, however, is not unique to anomaly mediation. We present examples of ``generalized'' gauge-mediated models with messengers in standard model representations that give nearly identical predictions for the gaugino masses, but positive (mass)^2 for all sleptons. There are remarkable similarities between an anomaly-mediated model with a small additional universal mass added to all scalars and the gauge-mediated models with a long-lived Wino next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle (NLSP), leading to only a small set of observables that provide robust distinguishing criteria. These include ratios of the heaviest to lightest selectrons, smuons, and stops. The sign of the gluino soft mass an unambiguous distinction, but requires measuring a difficult class of one-loop radiative corrections to sparticle interactions. A high precision measurement of the Higgs-b-\bar{b} coupling is probably the most promising interaction from which this sign might be extracted.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools