REVIEW 4 cited by
Consistent gravitino couplings in non-supersymmetric strings
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The massless spectrum of the ten dimensional USp(32) type I string has an N=1 supergravity multiplet coupled to non-supersymmetric matter. This raises the question of the consistency of the gravitino interactions. We resolve this apparent puzzle by arguing for the existence of a local supersymmetry which is non-linearly realised in the open sector. We determine the leading order low energy effective Lagrangian. Similar results are expected to apply to lower dimensional type I models where supergravity is coupled to non-supersymmetric branes.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Linear and nonlinear supersymmetry in field and string theory
Consistency criteria for constrained superfields, a gravitino energy and particle-production puzzle, the unique leading-order massive spin-2 to supergravity coupling, and a twisted Scherk-Schwarz orientifold with full...
-
Dark Photons and Gravitino Like Particles: Complete EFT Operator Basis
A new on-shell method using Young tableaux constructs complete EFT operator bases for massive particles of any spin, applied to dark photons and spin-3/2 gravitino-like particles up to dimension 8.
-
On Cosmologies and Vacua Driven by Tension and Curvatures
Classifies singularity structures and asymptotics of cosmological solutions driven by exponential string potentials and curvatures k, k' in maximally symmetric spaces, emphasizing flat slices.
-
Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry
A survey of tachyons and tadpoles in non-supersymmetric closed and orientifold strings, including ten-dimensional models and landscape attempts.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.