REVIEW 3 cited by
The Zamolodchikov-Faddeev Algebra for AdS_5 x S^5 Superstring
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We discuss the Zamolodchikov-Faddeev algebra for the superstring sigma-model on AdS_5 x S^5. We find the canonical su(2|2)^2 invariant S-matrix satisfying the standard Yang-Baxter and crossing symmetry equations. Its near-plane-wave expansion matches exactly the leading order term recently obtained by the direct perturbative computation. We also show that the S-matrix obtained by Beisert in the gauge theory framework does not satisfy the standard Yang-Baxter equation, and, as a consequence, the corresponding ZF algebra is twisted. The S-matrices in gauge and string theories however are physically equivalent and related by a non-local transformation of the basis states which is explicitly constructed.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
On the $AdS_3\times S^3\times S^3\times S^1$ dressing factors
Dressing factors are proposed for the S-matrix of massive worldsheet excitations in AdS3×S3×S3×S1 with mixed RR/NSNS flux that satisfy crossing, unitarity, and reproduce perturbative results for any radius ratio.
-
Structure Constants of a Single Trace Operator and Determinant Operators from Hexagon
Conjecture that the three-point structure constant of one single-trace and two determinant operators in N=4 SYM is given by glued hexagon form factors, reducing to partition sums with reflections at weak coupling and ...
-
Particle production in a light-cone gauge fixed Jordanian deformation of $AdS_5\times S^5$
In the light-cone gauge-fixed Jordanian deformation of AdS5×S5, on-shell cubic vertices produce nonzero 1-to-2 and 2-to-1 scattering processes, indicating particle production.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.