Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Scheme Independence and the Exact Renormalization Group

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 16 Nov 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim At leading order all our results are cutoff independent, while at next-to-leading order they are not, and the determination of critical exponents becomes ambiguous.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9411122 (version 3)
Pith IDDNPTDALU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationE. Moreno, J.I. Latorre, P.E. Haagensen, R. D. Ball. "Scheme Independence and the Exact Renormalization Group." arXiv:hep-th/9411122 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/DNPTDALU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,545 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.96 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.16 · compares with prior results 0.15 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We compute critical exponents in a $Z_2$ symmetric scalar field theory in three dimensions, using Wilson's exact renormalization group equations expanded in powers of derivatives. A nontrivial relation between these exponents is confirmed explicitly at the first two orders in the derivative expansion. At leading order all our results are cutoff independent, while at next-to-leading order they are not, and the determination of critical exponents becomes ambiguous. We discuss the possible ways in which this scheme ambiguity might be resolved.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We compute critical exponents in a $Z_2$ symmetric scalar field theory in three dimensions, using Wilson's exact renormalization group equations expanded in powers of derivatives. contribution 0.62 0.96 0.06 asserted 1.00
s1 A nontrivial relation between these exponents is confirmed explicitly at the first two orders in the derivative expansion. result 1.00 0.89 0.25 asserted 1.00
s2 At leading order all our results are cutoff independent, while at next-to-leading order they are not, and the determination of critical exponents becomes ambiguous. limitation 0.59 0.93 0.59 asserted 1.00
s3 We discuss the possible ways in which this scheme ambiguity might be resolved. future work 0.52 0.46 0.08 speculative 0.41

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.96 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.57.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We compute critical exponents in a $Z_2$ symmetric scalar field theory in three dimensions, using Wilson's exact renormalization group equations expanded in powers of derivatives. A nontrivial relation between these exponents is confirmed explicitly at the first two orders in the derivative expansion. At leading order all our results are cutoff independent, while at next-to-leading order they are not, and the determination of critical exponents becomes ambiguous. We discuss the possible ways in which this scheme ambiguity might be resolved.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

9 arXiv papers cite this in 21 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 16 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • In practice[ The reasoning of Ball et al is different but it is more convenient, and equivalent, to present it that way.], instead of considering $S_int$, Ball et al [ref] have chosen to perform the above change $d_ϕ^( c)$by $d_ϕ^( -)$ within the flow equation of the full action $S[ ϕ̃,t]$ (<ref>) which then reads: [equation]

    Structure of Exact Renormalization Group Equations for field theory · Field-renormalization: the “modified” Polchinski ERGE · 0.85

Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.