RECORD
Scheme Independence and the Exact Renormalization Group
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 16 Nov 1994
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim At leading order all our results are cutoff independent, while at next-to-leading order they are not, and the determination of critical exponents becomes ambiguous.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We compute critical exponents in a $Z_2$ symmetric scalar field theory in three dimensions, using Wilson's exact renormalization group equations expanded in powers of derivatives. A nontrivial relation between these exponents is confirmed explicitly at the first two orders in the derivative expansion. At leading order all our results are cutoff independent, while at next-to-leading order they are not, and the determination of critical exponents becomes ambiguous. We discuss the possible ways in which this scheme ambiguity might be resolved.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We compute critical exponents in a $Z_2$ symmetric scalar field theory in three dimensions, using Wilson's exact renormalization group equations expanded in powers of derivatives. | contribution 0.62 | 0.96 | 0.06 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | A nontrivial relation between these exponents is confirmed explicitly at the first two orders in the derivative expansion. | result 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.25 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | At leading order all our results are cutoff independent, while at next-to-leading order they are not, and the determination of critical exponents becomes ambiguous. | limitation 0.59 | 0.93 | 0.59 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | We discuss the possible ways in which this scheme ambiguity might be resolved. | future work 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.08 | speculative 0.41 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We compute critical exponents in a $Z_2$ symmetric scalar field theory in three dimensions, using Wilson's exact renormalization group equations expanded in powers of derivatives. A nontrivial relation between these exponents is confirmed explicitly at the first two orders in the derivative expansion. At leading order all our results are cutoff independent, while at next-to-leading order they are not, and the determination of critical exponents becomes ambiguous. We discuss the possible ways in which this scheme ambiguity might be resolved.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
9 arXiv papers cite this in 21 sentences
Papers citing it · 16 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
In practice[ The reasoning of Ball et al is different but it is more convenient, and equivalent, to present it that way.], instead of considering $S_int$, Ball et al [ref] have chosen to perform the above change $d_ϕ^( c)$by $d_ϕ^( -)$ within the flow equation of the full action $S[ ϕ̃,t]$ (<ref>) which then reads: [equation]
Structure of Exact Renormalization Group Equations for field theory · Field-renormalization: the “modified” Polchinski ERGE · 0.85
Compares with it 2 papers
-
Notice that this condition is independent of the choice of the cutoff function, contrary to what is observed with the complete $O( ∂^2)$-order [ref] (for another difference with the complete order, see footnote [ref]).
Revisiting the local potential approximation of the exact renormalization group equation · Pseudo-LPA · 0.90
-
Indeed, ([ref]) is the flow equation for $S$ as obtained by Ball et al [ref] , using the analytical method sketched in section <ref>, but in which the field-renormalization step is implemented via $𝒪_P( S,ϕ̃)$ instead of being implemented linearly within $𝒢_dil$ exclusively.
Structure of Exact Renormalization Group Equations for field theory · Structural derivation · 0.89
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
Beyond the determinations of the critical exponent $ν$ in the LPA, great efforts have been made to determine $ν$ and $η$ in the NLO of the GE taking with the evolution of either the uniform (NLOu) [ref] or the field-dependent (NLOf) [ref] wavefunction renormalization.
Effect of the quartic gradient terms on the critical exponents of the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in $O(N)$ models · Short overview on the present status of the determination of the critical exponents of the WF FP in the functional RG fr · 0.91
-
Section ([ref]) shows how these latter two steps have been currently implemented to give the so-called “modified” Polchinski ERGE [ref] .
Structure of Exact Renormalization Group Equations for field theory · Introduction · 0.81
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.