RECORD
Connected components of real double Bruhat cells
Algebraic Geometry · Submitted 31 Mar 2000
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim As a first step towards understanding this topology, we enumerate the connected components of real double Bruhat cells.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Double Bruhat cells in a semisimple group are intersections of cells in two Bruhat decompositions corresponding to two opposite Borel subgroups. They form a geometric framework for the study of total positivity in semisimple groups; they are also closely related to symplectic leaves in the corresponding Poisson-Lie groups. The term "cells" might be misleading because their topology can be quite non-trivial. As a first step towards understanding this topology, we enumerate the connected components of real double Bruhat cells. This result extends (from the simply-laced case to the general one) and proves the conjecture made in a joint work with B.Shapiro-M.Shapiro-A.Vainshtein; it also extends earlier work by B.Shapiro-M.Shapiro-A.Vainshtein and K.Rietsch.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Double Bruhat cells in a semisimple group are intersections of cells in two Bruhat decompositions corresponding to two opposite Borel subgroups. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | They form a geometric framework for the study of total positivity in semisimple groups; they are also closely related to symplectic leaves in the corresponding Poisson-Lie groups. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | The term "cells" might be misleading because their topology can be quite non-trivial. | background 0.81 | 0.10 | 0.02 | speculative 0.41 |
| s3 | As a first step towards understanding this topology, we enumerate the connected components of real double Bruhat cells. | contribution 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.17 | asserted 0.93 |
| s4 | This result extends (from the simply-laced case to the general one) and proves the conjecture made in a joint work with B.Shapiro-M.Shapiro-A.Vainshtein; it also extends earlier work by B.Shapiro-M.Shapiro-A.Vainshtein and K.Rietsch. | result 0.55 | 0.88 | 0.74 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Double Bruhat cells in a semisimple group are intersections of cells in two Bruhat decompositions corresponding to two opposite Borel subgroups. They form a geometric framework for the study of total positivity in semisimple groups; they are also closely related to symplectic leaves in the corresponding Poisson-Lie groups. The term "cells" might be misleading because their topology can be quite non-trivial. As a first step towards understanding this topology, we enumerate the connected components of real double Bruhat cells. This result extends (from the simply-laced case to the general one) and proves the conjecture made in a joint work with B.Shapiro-M.Shapiro-A.Vainshtein; it also extends earlier work by B.Shapiro-M.Shapiro-A.Vainshtein and K.Rietsch.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Papers citing it
Compares with it 1 paper
-
The following lemma is essentially equivalent to Zelevinsky's result on double Bruhat cells [ref] .
Cluster Structures on Double Bott-Samelson Cells · Coordinate Rings as Upper Cluster Algebras · 0.90
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.