RECORD
Karlsson-Minton type hypergeometric functions on the root system C_n
Classical Analysis and ODEs · Submitted 10 May 2002
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We prove a reduction formula for Karlsson-Minton type hypergeometric series on the root system C_n and derive some consequences of this identity.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We prove a reduction formula for Karlsson-Minton type hypergeometric series on the root system C_n and derive some consequences of this identity. In particular, when combined with a similar reduction formula for A_n, it implies a C_n Watson transformation due to Milne and Lilly.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We prove a reduction formula for Karlsson-Minton type hypergeometric series on the root system C_n and derive some consequences of this identity. | contribution 0.81 | 0.96 | 0.89 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | In particular, when combined with a similar reduction formula for A_n, it implies a C_n Watson transformation due to Milne and Lilly. | interpretation 0.90 | 0.51 | 0.19 | asserted 0.98 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We prove a reduction formula for Karlsson-Minton type hypergeometric series on the root system C_n and derive some consequences of this identity. In particular, when combined with a similar reduction formula for A_n, it implies a C_n Watson transformation due to Milne and Lilly.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.