Bernstein-Sato polynomials of hyperplane arrangements

Morihiko Saito

REVIEW

Bernstein-Sato polynomials of hyperplane arrangements

Morihiko Saito

Algebraic Geometry · Submitted 23 Feb 2006 · 51 references

Pith's verdict: Saito proves the root bound and -1 multiplicity for hyperplane arrangement Bernstein-Sato polynomials, and closes the Denef-Loeser conjecture in dimension three; the proof is plausible but hinges on a terse vanishing theorem that a referee should check.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 4 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDmath/0602527 (version 9)

Pith IDKEHFK3OS, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationMorihiko Saito. "Bernstein-Sato polynomials of hyperplane arrangements." arXiv:math/0602527 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/KEHFK3OS

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

First thing you should know: this paper proves something structural, not incremental. Theorem 1—that for any central hyperplane arrangement the roots of bf(-s) lie below 2 - 1/d and the multiplicity of -1 is exactly n—is genuinely new and settles the leading edge and distinguished multiplicity for all such arrangements. The same machinery also gives the dense-edge multiplicity bound of Theorem 2 and finishes the Denef-Loeser conjecture in the n=3 case. That is real progress, extending Walther's generic-case formula to non-generic arrangements.

What is done well: the central trick is combining Malgrange's pole-order formula with the Aomoto/Esnault-Schechtman-Terao-Varchenko-Viehweg theory of twisted de Rham complexes. This gives a uniform calculational route that does not need normality crossings, and it is applied honestly. The paper is also candid about its limits: Remark 4.14 says the method stalls for sufficiently complicated arrangements, and Remark 5.4(iii) leans on a forthcoming paper for some torsion-freeness claims used in examples.

The soft spots are gaps, not holes, but they should not be waved away. The proof of Theorem 1 rests on the vanishing statement (2.2.1), H^j(~Y, Ω^p(log~Z)⊗O(k)) = 0 for j > 0, which is justified in a single paragraph of increasing induction on n. That is a strong vanishing theorem, and it is the bridge to the quasi-isomorphism (2.2.2) that does the real work. I would not bet against it, but the proof as written is too terse for such a load-bearing step; a referee should ask for a detailed argument or a precise reference. The explicit calculations for degree up to 7 (Theorems 4.11–4.12) rely on case classifications and computer checks that are acknowledged but not shipped, and the phrase "details left to the reader" appears. The citation pattern is fine: the self-citations are to published theorems with independent proofs, not to the target result.

Bottom line: this deserves serious refereeing. Send it to review, but ask for a fuller proof of (2.2.1) and, if feasible, the computer-verification data as ancillary files. The main theorems are plausible and important; the missing details are fillable rather than fatal.

Referee report

Significance

If Theorem 1 is correct, it is a substantial improvement over the general bound (0.1): for every central hyperplane arrangement, the largest root of b_f(-s) is uniformly below 2 rather than possibly as large as n - α_f. The multiplicity statement m_1 = n is also new and sharp, and the combination of Malgrange-type formulas with Aomoto complexes gives a constructive method for concrete calculations. The paper also provides a proof of the Denef-Loeser conjecture for n = 3, a result with independent interest. The explicit examples, including Walther's non-combinatorial example, are valuable. However, the full force of these results depends on a small number of technical points that are only sketched, notably the vanishing theorem (2.2.1) and the case classifications in Section 4.

Major objections (4)

[Section 2.2, Eq. (2.2.1)] The vanishing theorem H^j(~Y, Ω^p_{~Y}(log ~Z) ⊗ O~E) = 0 for j > 0 is the load-bearing bridge for Theorem 1: it is used to justify the quasi-isomorphism (2.2.2), and hence the identification of the pole-order filtration with logarithmic cohomology. The proof is only a short induction sketch. In particular, the restriction to the hypersurface ~H requires an exact sequence relating Ω^p_{~Y}(log ~Z) ⊗ O~E to the corresponding objects on ~H, and the argument needs to control both the O~H(k) and O~H(k-1) twists, including the boundary case k = 1. As written, these steps are not fully displayed. I recommend expanding this into a complete proof or giving a precise reference for the k > 0 case.
[Section 4.11-4.12, Theorem 4.12] The proof of Theorem 4.12 relies on a classification of affine line arrangements for d ≤ 8 that is asserted in table (4.11.3) with the comment 'the details are left to the reader', and on case-by-case computations for d = 6, 7 involving the parameter families (4.12.4)-(4.12.6). These cases determine whether r_f = 2d-2 or 2d-3, which is a central part of the claimed explicit calculations. The reader cannot verify the assertions c = 0 or c = 1 in Proposition 4.7 without substantially more detail. I ask that the classification and the computations of c for each family be written out, or that reproducible computer code and output be provided.
[Section 5.1, Proposition 5.2 and Lemma 5.3] Theorem 3 depends on Proposition 1, whose proof is reduced to Proposition 5.2 and Lemma 5.3. The proof of Proposition 5.2 asserts the existence of a subset I = {i_1, i_2} satisfying condition (2.1.2), but the verification is not carried out; in the case where a point z_1 of multiplicity m exists, the dichotomy J(z_0) ∩ J(z_1) = ∅ versus the complementary case is stated without the necessary group-theoretic or geometric details. Lemma 5.3 is then dismissed with 'can be verified easily'. Since these lemmas are load-bearing for the Denef-Loeser application, the missing verifications should be supplied in full.
[Remark 5.4(iii) and Section 4.14] Several explicit conclusions, including the b-functions in Example 4.13 and the tables in Remark 4.14, use the assertion that H''_{f,x} is t-torsion free, which is stated to be proved in a forthcoming paper. This is not part of the proof of Theorem 1, but it is part of the paper's advertised calculational method. The dependence on an unpublished result should either be removed by proving the needed statement here or clearly marked as conditional.

Minor objections (4)

[Introduction, paragraph after (0.1)] The phrase 'd > n /greaterorequalslant2' appears to be a typographical corruption; it should read 'd > n ≥ 2' or similar.
[Section 4.14(iii), tables] The quantity τ is used in the tables without a definition. Please define τ explicitly, or explain that it is the total Tjurina number and give the reference.
[Remark 4.10 and Example 4.13] The claims about computer verifications by M. Noro and A. Dimca and G. Sticlaru are reported without reproducible data. If such verifications are essential, include the scripts or the precise outputs; otherwise state clearly which assertions are independent of the computer calculations.
[Bibliography] Several references are listed as preprints or forthcoming without updates: [DiSa3], [DiSa4], [Kl], [Wa2]. Please update the status of these references if possible, and otherwise indicate which of them have appeared since the latest version of the manuscript.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

For every central hyperplane arrangement, the roots of $b_f(-s)$ lie below $2 - 1/d$, and the root $1$ has multiplicity equal to the ambient dimension.

The reading

This paper proves universal constraints on the Bernstein-Sato polynomial (the b-function) of a central hyperplane arrangement. For an arrangement in $\mathbb{C}^n$ of degree $d$ with reduced equation $f$, it shows that every root of $b_f(-s)$ is less than $2 - 1/d$, and that the root $1$ (equivalently $-1$ for $b_f(s)$) has multiplicity exactly $n$, the effective dimension. It also bounds the multiplicities of other roots by combinatorial data attached to the dense edges, and uses these tools to confirm a conjecture relating the b-function to the topological zeta function in dimension three. The result matters because it gives structural, not case-by-case, control of an invariant that had been computable only in generic or small examples.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the Aomoto complex: the finite-dimensional complex $A^\bullet_{g,\alpha}$ generated by wedge products of logarithmic forms $\omega_i = dg_i/g_i$, with differential $\omega_\alpha \wedge$, which under non-resonance conditions computes the cohomology of the rank-one local systems $L(k/d)$ on the complement of the arrangement. The paper's new twist is a partial generalization that allows a nontrivial line bundle $E = \mathcal{O}_Y(k)$: after an embedded resolution, a vanishing theorem $H^j(\widetilde{Y}, \Omega^p_{\widetilde{Y}}(\log \widetilde{Z}) \otimes \mathcal{O}_{\widetilde{E}}) = 0$ for $j>0$ shows that global logarithmic sections give the cohomology (quasi-isomorphism (2.2.2)). This reduces the infinite-dimensional D-module problem for the b-function to finite-dimensional linear algebra in the Aomoto complex, while the pole-order filtration connects those cohomology groups to the roots and multiplicities through the generalized Malgrange-type formula.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated as Theorem 1, is that for a central hyperplane arrangement in $\mathbb{C}^n$ with reduced equation $f$ of degree $d$, the set $R_f$ of roots of $b_f(-s)$ satisfies $\max R_f < 2 - 1/d$ and the multiplicity of the root $1$ is $n$. The paper further proves (Theorem 2) that every root lies in the finite set of rational numbers $(1/m_L)\mathbb{Z}$ indexed by dense edges $L$, with multiplicity bounded by the maximal size of a strongly adjacent family of dense edges carrying the relevant eigenvalue, and that coprime adjacent dense edges force multiplicity one. Theorem 3 completes the proof of a conjecture relating the b-function to the topological zeta function for reduced hyperplane arrangements in dimension three. The proof of Theorem 1 is the load-bearing step: it combines a generalized form of the classical Brieskorn-lattice formula, which ties the pole-order filtration to roots and multiplicities, with a partial generalization of Aomoto complex theory in which a vanishing theorem ensures that global logarithmic sections compute the relevant cohomology even for nontrivial line bundles.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the root bound rests on a cohomology-vanishing assertion for logarithmic forms after blowing up dense edges; if that vanishing fails for some arrangement, the identification between global sections and the relevant cohomology, and hence the root bound, would not follow by the stated argument.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every central hyperplane arrangement, the roots of $b_f(-s)$ lie between $0$ and $2 - 1/d$, and the only integral root is $1$, with multiplicity equal to the effective dimension $n$.
Every root is an integer multiple of $1/m_L$ for some dense edge $L$, so the possible roots form a finite set determined by the multiplicities of the arrangement's dense edges.
When adjacent dense edges have coprime multiplicities, every non-integral root has multiplicity one, giving a clean multiplicity rule in the coprime case.
In dimension three, the product of the b-function and the topological zeta function has no poles, settling the conjecture that relates them for reduced hyperplane arrangements with $n=3$.
For generic (normal-crossing) arrangements the method recovers an explicit formula for $b_f(s)$, with a factor $(s+1)^n$ and linear factors at each $k/d$ in the predicted range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The bound $\max R_f < 2 - 1/d$ is probably not optimal: the generic normal-crossing formula attains $2 - 2/d$ as its largest root, so one might conjecture the true universal upper bound for indecomposable arrangements is $2 - 2/d$, with equality in a larger class than the generic arrangements.
Because the proof reduces an infinite-dimensional D-module calculation to finite-dimensional Aomoto complexes, it suggests a practical finite algorithm for $b_f(s)$: for each degree and combinatorial type, compute the finite complex and read off the polynomial; the paper's $d \le 8$, $n=3$ cases are the natural testbed for such an implementation.
The equality $m_1 = n$ means the reduced b-function has no further factor at $s=1$; in Hodge-theoretic language the full distinguished multiplicity is absorbed by the top Milnor cohomology, which may be why jumping-coefficient methods alone cannot detect this root.
Theorem 3.8 gives a sufficient Hodge-number criterion for a root $k/d$ to have multiplicity two; a direct extension would be to test whether the same inequality is also necessary, since Remark 3.10 leaves the converse open.

Original abstract

We show that the Bernstein-Sato polynomial (that is, the b-function) of a hyperplane arrangement with a reduced equation is calculable by combining a generalization of Malgrange's formula with the theory of Aomoto complexes due to Esnault, Schechtman, Terao, Varchenko, and Viehweg in certain cases. We prove in general that the roots are greater than -2 and the multiplicity of the root -1 is equal to the (effective) dimension of the ambient space. We also give an estimate of the multiplicities of the roots in terms of the multiplicities of the arrangement at the dense edges, and provide a method to calculate the Bernstein-Sato polynomial at least in the case of 3 variables with degree at most 7 and generic multiplicities at most 3. Using our argument, we can terminate the proof of a conjecture of Denef and Loeser on the relation between the topological zeta function and the Bernstein-Sato polynomial of a reduced hyperplane arrangement in the 3 variable case.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,922 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.87 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.46 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v9. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We show that the Bernstein-Sato polynomial (that is, the b-function) of a hyperplane arrangement with a reduced equation is calculable by combining a generalization of Malgrange's formula with the theory of Aomoto complexes due to Esnault, Schechtman, Terao, Varchenko, and Viehweg in certain cases. We prove in general that the roots are greater than -2 and the multiplicity of the root -1 is equal to the (effective) dimension of the ambient space. We also give an estimate of the multiplicities of the roots in terms of the multiplicities of the arrangement at the dense edges, and provide a method to calculate the Bernstein-Sato polynomial at least in the case of 3 variables with degree at most 7 and generic multiplicities at most 3. Using our argument, we can terminate the proof of a conjecture of Denef and Loeser on the relation between the topological zeta function and the Bernstein-Sato polynomial of a reduced hyperplane arrangement in the 3 variable case.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We show that the Bernstein-Sato polynomial (that is, the b-function) of a hyperplane arrangement with a reduced equation is calculable by combining a generalization of Malgrange's formula with the theory of Aomoto complexes due to Esnault, Schechtman, Terao, Varchenko, and Viehweg in certain cases.	contribution 0.62	0.91	0.43	asserted 0.99
s1	We prove in general that the roots are greater than -2 and the multiplicity of the root -1 is equal to the (effective) dimension of the ambient space.	result 0.99	0.96	0.35	asserted 1.00
s2	We also give an estimate of the multiplicities of the roots in terms of the multiplicities of the arrangement at the dense edges, and provide a method to calculate the Bernstein-Sato polynomial at least in the case of 3 variables with degree at most 7 and generic multiplicities at most 3.	contribution 0.51	0.96	0.13	asserted 0.96
s3	Using our argument, we can terminate the proof of a conjecture of Denef and Loeser on the relation between the topological zeta function and the Bernstein-Sato polynomial of a reduced hyperplane arrangement in the 3 variable case.	result 0.75	0.93	0.20	asserted 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v9

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (51)

[1]

Artal-Bartolo, E., Combinatorics and topology of line arrangements in the complex projective plane, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 121 (1994), 385--390

View on Pith 1994
[2]

Barlet, D. and Saito, M., Brieskorn modules and Gauss-Manin systems for non-isolated hypersurface singularities, J.\ London Math.\ Soc.\ (2) 76 (2007), 211--224

View on Pith 2007
[3]

Beilinson, A.A., Bernstein, J.N.\ and Deligne, P., Faisceaux pervers, Ast\'erisque 100, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 1982

View on Pith 1982
[4]

Bernstein, J.N., The analytic continuation of generalized functions with respect to a parameter, Functional Analysis and its Applications 6 (1972), 273-285

View on Pith 1972
[5]

Brieskorn, E., Die Monodromie der isolierten Singularit\"aten von Hyperfl\"achen, Manuscripta Math., 2 (1970), 103--161

View on Pith 1970
[6]

Brieskorn, E., Sur les groupes de tresses, S\'eminaire Bourbaki, 24\`eme ann\'ee (1971/1972), Exp. No. 401, Lect.\ Notes in Math. Vol. 317, Springer, Berlin, 1973, pp. 21--44

View on Pith 1971
[7]

Budur, N., On Hodge spectrum and multiplier ideals, Math. Ann. 327 (2003), 257--270

View on Pith 2003
[8]

Budur, N., Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., First Milnor cohomology of hyperplane arrangements, in Topology of algebraic varieties and singularities, Contemp.\ Math., 538, Amer.\ Math.\ Soc., Providence, RI, 2011, 279--292

View on Pith 2011
[9]

Budur, N. and Saito, M., Multiplier ideals, V -filtration, and spectrum, J. Alg.\ Geom.\ 14 (2005), 269--282

View on Pith 2005
[10]

Budur, N. and Saito, M., Jumping coefficients and spectrum of a hyperplane arrangement, Math.\ Ann.\ 347 (2010), 545--579

View on Pith 2010
[11]

Budur, N., Saito, M.\ and Yuzvinsky, S., On the local zeta functions and the b -functions of certain hyperplane arrangements, with an appendix by W.\ Veys, J.\ London Math.\ Soc.\ (2) 84 (2011), 631--648

View on Pith 2011
[12]

Cohen, D.C., Dimca, A. and Orlik, P., Nonresonance conditions for arrangements, Ann. Inst. Fourier 53 (2003), 1883--1896

View on Pith 2003
[13]

Cohen, D. and Suciu, A., On Milnor fibrations of arrangements, J. London Math. Soc. 51 (1995), 105--119

View on Pith 1995
[14]

Deligne, P., Equations Diff\'erentielles \`a Points Singuliers R\'eguliers, Lect.\ Notes in Math. vol. 163, Springer, Berlin, 1970

View on Pith 1970
[15]

Deligne, P., Th\'eorie de Hodge II, Publ. Math. IHES, 40 (1971), 5--58

View on Pith 1971
[16]

Deligne, P., Le formalisme des cycles \'evanescents, in SGA7 XIII and XIV, Lect.\ Notes in Math. 340, Springer, Berlin, 1973, pp. 82--115 and 116--164

View on Pith 1973
[17]

Denef J.\ and Loeser, F., Caract\'eristiques d'Euler-Poincar\'e, fonctions z\'eta locales et modifications analytiques, J.\ Amer.\ Math.\ Soc.\ 5 (1992) 705--720

View on Pith 1992
[18]

Dimca, A., Singularities and Topology of Hypersurfaces, Springer, Berlin, 1992

View on Pith 1992
[19]

Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., Some consequences of perversity of vanishing cycles, Ann.\ Inst.\ Fourier 54 (2004), 1769--1792

View on Pith 2004
[20]

Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., A generalization of Griffiths' theorem on rational integrals, Duke Math.\ J.\ 135 (2006), 303--326

View on Pith 2006
[21]

Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., Koszul complexes and spectra of projective hypersurfaces with isolated singularities, arXiv:1212.1081

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[22]

Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., Generalization of theorems of Griffiths and Steenbrink to hypersurfaces with ordinary double points, arXiv:14034563

View on Pith
[23]

Ein, L., Lazarsfeld, R., Smith, K.E. and Varolin, D., Jumping coefficients of multiplier ideals, Duke Math.\ J.\ 123 (2004), 469--506

View on Pith 2004
[24]

Esnault, H., Schechtman, V. and Viehweg, E., Cohomology of local systems on the complement of hyperplanes, Inv.\ Math.\ 109 (1992), 557--561

View on Pith 1992
[25]

Falk, M., Arrangements and cohomology, Ann.\ Combin.\ 1 (1997), 135--157

View on Pith 1997
[26]

Falk, M. and Yuzvinsky, S., Multinets, resonance varieties, and pencils of plane curves, Compos.\ Math.\ 143 (2007), 1069--1088

View on Pith 2007
[27]

Kashiwara, M., B -functions and holonomic systems, Inv.\ Math.\ 38 (1976/77), 33--53

View on Pith 1976
[28]

Kashiwara, M., Vanishing cycle sheaves and holonomic systems of differential equations, Lect.\ Notes in Math. 1016, Springer, Berlin, 1983, pp. 134--142

View on Pith 1983
[29]

Kloosterman, R., On the relation between Alexander polynomials and Mordell-Weil ranks, equianalytic deformations and a variant of Nagata's conjecture (preprint)

View on Pith
[30]

Koll\'ar, J., Singularities of pairs, Proc.\ Symp.\ Pure Math., A.M.S. 62 Part 1, (1997), 221--287

View on Pith 1997
[31]

Lazarsfeld, R., Positivity in algebraic geometry II, Springer, Berlin, 2004

View on Pith 2004
[32]

Libgober, A.\ and Yuzvinsky, S., Cohomology of the Orlik-Solomon algebras and local systems, Compos.\ Math.\ 121 (2000), 337--361

View on Pith 2000
[33]

Malgrange, B., Le polyn\^ome de Bernstein d'une singularit\'e isol\'ee, Lect.\ Notes in Math.\ 459, Springer, Berlin, 1975, pp. 98--119

View on Pith 1975
[34]

Malgrange, B., Polyn\^ome de Bernstein-Sato et cohomologie \'evanescente, Analysis and topology on singular spaces, II, III (Luminy, 1981), Ast\'erisque 101--102 (1983), 243--267

View on Pith 1983
[35]

Musta t a , M., Multiplier ideals of hyperplane arrangements, Trans.\ Amer.\ Math.\ Soc.\ 358 (2006), 5015--5023

View on Pith 2006
[36]

Orlik, P.\ and Randell, R., The Milnor fiber of a generic arrangement, Ark. Mat. 31 (1993), 71--81

View on Pith 1993
[37]

Orlik, P.\ and Solomon, L., Combinatorics and topology of complements of hyperplanes, Inv.\ Math.\ 56 (1980), 167--189

View on Pith 1980
[38]

Saito, M., Mixed Hodge modules, Publ.\ RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 26 (1990), 221--333

View on Pith 1990
[39]

Saito, M., On microlocal b -function, Bull.\ Soc.\ Math.\ France 122 (1994), 163--184

View on Pith 1994
[40]

Saito, M., Multiplier ideals, b -function, and spectrum of a hypersurface singularity, Compos.\ Math.\ 143 (2007), 1050--1068

View on Pith 2007
[41]

Saito, M., On real log canonical thresholds, arXiv:0707.2308

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[42]

Saito, M., Hilbert series of graded Milnor algebras and roots of Bernstein-Sato polynomials , arXiv:1509.06288

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[43]

Sato, M. (ed.), Singularities of Hypersurfaces and b -Function (Proceedings of workshop in 1973), RIMS Kokyuroku 225 (in Japanese), 1975

View on Pith 1973
[44]

Sato M.\ and Shintani, T., On zeta functions associated with prehomogeneous vector spaces, Proc.\ Nat.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ USA 69 (1972), 1081--1082

View on Pith 1972
[45]

Schechtman, V., Terao, H. and Varchenko, A., Local systems over complements of hyperplanes and the Kac-Kazhdan conditions for singular vectors, J.\ Pure Appl.\ Algebra 100 (1995), 93--102

View on Pith 1995
[46]

Scherk, J.\ and Steenbrink, J.H.M., On the mixed Hodge structure on the cohomology of the Milnor fibre, Math.\ Ann.\ 271 (1985), 641--665

View on Pith 1985
[47]

Steenbrink, J.H.M., Intersection form for quasi-homogeneous singularities, Compositio Math.\ 34 (1977), 211--223

View on Pith 1977
[48]

Steenbrink, J.H.M., Mixed Hodge structure on the vanishing cohomology, in Real and Complex Singularities (Proc. Nordic Summer School, Oslo, 1976) Alphen a/d Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff 1977, pp. 525--563

View on Pith 1976
[49]

Steenbrink, J.H.M., The spectrum of hypersurface singularity, Ast\'erisque 179--180 (1989), 163--184

View on Pith 1989
[50]

Walther, U., Bernstein-Sato polynomial versus cohomology of the Milnor fiber for generic hyperplane arrangements, Compos.\ Math.\ 141 (2005), 121--145

View on Pith 2005
[51]

Walther, U., The Jacobian module, the Milnor fiber, and the D -module generated by f^s (preprint)

View on Pith

How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 1 paper

By Mustaţă [ref] , the minimal jumping coefficient of $𝒜$ is [equation] Using the above relationship between $b$-functions and jumping coefficients, we can rephrase this (as was done in [ref] ) as follows: [equation]

The Bernstein-Sato $b$-function of the Vandermonde determinant · Partial proof of main conjecture · 0.81

Cites it as background 2 papers

This active area of research draws together the study of $b$-functions with several other important singularity invariants, including Igusa zeta functions, jumping coefficients, and local monodromy [ref] .

The Bernstein-Sato $b$-function of the Vandermonde determinant · Introduction · 0.99
About Bernstein-Sato polynomials, Steenbrink spectra, and multiplier ideals, see [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , etc.

A young person's guide to mixed Hodge modules · Introduction · 0.99

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

Artal-Bartolo, E., Combinatorics and topology of line arrangements in the complex projective plane, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 121 (1994), 385--390

View on Pith 1994

[2] [2]

Barlet, D. and Saito, M., Brieskorn modules and Gauss-Manin systems for non-isolated hypersurface singularities, J.\ London Math.\ Soc.\ (2) 76 (2007), 211--224

View on Pith 2007

[3] [3]

Beilinson, A.A., Bernstein, J.N.\ and Deligne, P., Faisceaux pervers, Ast\'erisque 100, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 1982

View on Pith 1982

[4] [4]

Bernstein, J.N., The analytic continuation of generalized functions with respect to a parameter, Functional Analysis and its Applications 6 (1972), 273-285

View on Pith 1972

[5] [5]

Brieskorn, E., Die Monodromie der isolierten Singularit\"aten von Hyperfl\"achen, Manuscripta Math., 2 (1970), 103--161

View on Pith 1970

[6] [6]

Brieskorn, E., Sur les groupes de tresses, S\'eminaire Bourbaki, 24\`eme ann\'ee (1971/1972), Exp. No. 401, Lect.\ Notes in Math. Vol. 317, Springer, Berlin, 1973, pp. 21--44

View on Pith 1971

[7] [7]

Budur, N., On Hodge spectrum and multiplier ideals, Math. Ann. 327 (2003), 257--270

View on Pith 2003

[8] [8]

Budur, N., Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., First Milnor cohomology of hyperplane arrangements, in Topology of algebraic varieties and singularities, Contemp.\ Math., 538, Amer.\ Math.\ Soc., Providence, RI, 2011, 279--292

View on Pith 2011

[9] [9]

Budur, N. and Saito, M., Multiplier ideals, V -filtration, and spectrum, J. Alg.\ Geom.\ 14 (2005), 269--282

View on Pith 2005

[10] [10]

Budur, N. and Saito, M., Jumping coefficients and spectrum of a hyperplane arrangement, Math.\ Ann.\ 347 (2010), 545--579

View on Pith 2010

[11] [11]

Budur, N., Saito, M.\ and Yuzvinsky, S., On the local zeta functions and the b -functions of certain hyperplane arrangements, with an appendix by W.\ Veys, J.\ London Math.\ Soc.\ (2) 84 (2011), 631--648

View on Pith 2011

[12] [12]

Cohen, D.C., Dimca, A. and Orlik, P., Nonresonance conditions for arrangements, Ann. Inst. Fourier 53 (2003), 1883--1896

View on Pith 2003

[13] [13]

Cohen, D. and Suciu, A., On Milnor fibrations of arrangements, J. London Math. Soc. 51 (1995), 105--119

View on Pith 1995

[14] [14]

Deligne, P., Equations Diff\'erentielles \`a Points Singuliers R\'eguliers, Lect.\ Notes in Math. vol. 163, Springer, Berlin, 1970

View on Pith 1970

[15] [15]

Deligne, P., Th\'eorie de Hodge II, Publ. Math. IHES, 40 (1971), 5--58

View on Pith 1971

[16] [16]

Deligne, P., Le formalisme des cycles \'evanescents, in SGA7 XIII and XIV, Lect.\ Notes in Math. 340, Springer, Berlin, 1973, pp. 82--115 and 116--164

View on Pith 1973

[17] [17]

Denef J.\ and Loeser, F., Caract\'eristiques d'Euler-Poincar\'e, fonctions z\'eta locales et modifications analytiques, J.\ Amer.\ Math.\ Soc.\ 5 (1992) 705--720

View on Pith 1992

[18] [18]

Dimca, A., Singularities and Topology of Hypersurfaces, Springer, Berlin, 1992

View on Pith 1992

[19] [19]

Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., Some consequences of perversity of vanishing cycles, Ann.\ Inst.\ Fourier 54 (2004), 1769--1792

View on Pith 2004

[20] [20]

Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., A generalization of Griffiths' theorem on rational integrals, Duke Math.\ J.\ 135 (2006), 303--326

View on Pith 2006

[21] [21]

Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., Koszul complexes and spectra of projective hypersurfaces with isolated singularities, arXiv:1212.1081

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[22] [22]

Dimca, A.\ and Saito, M., Generalization of theorems of Griffiths and Steenbrink to hypersurfaces with ordinary double points, arXiv:14034563

View on Pith

[23] [23]

Ein, L., Lazarsfeld, R., Smith, K.E. and Varolin, D., Jumping coefficients of multiplier ideals, Duke Math.\ J.\ 123 (2004), 469--506

View on Pith 2004

[24] [24]

Esnault, H., Schechtman, V. and Viehweg, E., Cohomology of local systems on the complement of hyperplanes, Inv.\ Math.\ 109 (1992), 557--561

View on Pith 1992

[25] [25]

Falk, M., Arrangements and cohomology, Ann.\ Combin.\ 1 (1997), 135--157

View on Pith 1997

[26] [26]

Falk, M. and Yuzvinsky, S., Multinets, resonance varieties, and pencils of plane curves, Compos.\ Math.\ 143 (2007), 1069--1088

View on Pith 2007

[27] [27]

Kashiwara, M., B -functions and holonomic systems, Inv.\ Math.\ 38 (1976/77), 33--53

View on Pith 1976

[28] [28]

Kashiwara, M., Vanishing cycle sheaves and holonomic systems of differential equations, Lect.\ Notes in Math. 1016, Springer, Berlin, 1983, pp. 134--142

View on Pith 1983

[29] [29]

Kloosterman, R., On the relation between Alexander polynomials and Mordell-Weil ranks, equianalytic deformations and a variant of Nagata's conjecture (preprint)

View on Pith

[30] [30]

Koll\'ar, J., Singularities of pairs, Proc.\ Symp.\ Pure Math., A.M.S. 62 Part 1, (1997), 221--287

View on Pith 1997

[31] [31]

Lazarsfeld, R., Positivity in algebraic geometry II, Springer, Berlin, 2004

View on Pith 2004

[32] [32]

Libgober, A.\ and Yuzvinsky, S., Cohomology of the Orlik-Solomon algebras and local systems, Compos.\ Math.\ 121 (2000), 337--361

View on Pith 2000

[33] [33]

Malgrange, B., Le polyn\^ome de Bernstein d'une singularit\'e isol\'ee, Lect.\ Notes in Math.\ 459, Springer, Berlin, 1975, pp. 98--119

View on Pith 1975

[34] [34]

Malgrange, B., Polyn\^ome de Bernstein-Sato et cohomologie \'evanescente, Analysis and topology on singular spaces, II, III (Luminy, 1981), Ast\'erisque 101--102 (1983), 243--267

View on Pith 1983

[35] [35]

Musta t a , M., Multiplier ideals of hyperplane arrangements, Trans.\ Amer.\ Math.\ Soc.\ 358 (2006), 5015--5023

View on Pith 2006

[36] [36]

Orlik, P.\ and Randell, R., The Milnor fiber of a generic arrangement, Ark. Mat. 31 (1993), 71--81

View on Pith 1993

[37] [37]

Orlik, P.\ and Solomon, L., Combinatorics and topology of complements of hyperplanes, Inv.\ Math.\ 56 (1980), 167--189

View on Pith 1980

[38] [38]

Saito, M., Mixed Hodge modules, Publ.\ RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 26 (1990), 221--333

View on Pith 1990

[39] [39]

Saito, M., On microlocal b -function, Bull.\ Soc.\ Math.\ France 122 (1994), 163--184

View on Pith 1994

[40] [40]

Saito, M., Multiplier ideals, b -function, and spectrum of a hypersurface singularity, Compos.\ Math.\ 143 (2007), 1050--1068

View on Pith 2007

[41] [41]

Saito, M., On real log canonical thresholds, arXiv:0707.2308

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[42] [42]

Saito, M., Hilbert series of graded Milnor algebras and roots of Bernstein-Sato polynomials , arXiv:1509.06288

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[43] [43]

Sato, M. (ed.), Singularities of Hypersurfaces and b -Function (Proceedings of workshop in 1973), RIMS Kokyuroku 225 (in Japanese), 1975

View on Pith 1973

[44] [44]

Sato M.\ and Shintani, T., On zeta functions associated with prehomogeneous vector spaces, Proc.\ Nat.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ USA 69 (1972), 1081--1082

View on Pith 1972

[45] [45]

Schechtman, V., Terao, H. and Varchenko, A., Local systems over complements of hyperplanes and the Kac-Kazhdan conditions for singular vectors, J.\ Pure Appl.\ Algebra 100 (1995), 93--102

View on Pith 1995

[46] [46]

Scherk, J.\ and Steenbrink, J.H.M., On the mixed Hodge structure on the cohomology of the Milnor fibre, Math.\ Ann.\ 271 (1985), 641--665

View on Pith 1985

[47] [47]

Steenbrink, J.H.M., Intersection form for quasi-homogeneous singularities, Compositio Math.\ 34 (1977), 211--223

View on Pith 1977

[48] [48]

Steenbrink, J.H.M., Mixed Hodge structure on the vanishing cohomology, in Real and Complex Singularities (Proc. Nordic Summer School, Oslo, 1976) Alphen a/d Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff 1977, pp. 525--563

View on Pith 1976

[49] [49]

Steenbrink, J.H.M., The spectrum of hypersurface singularity, Ast\'erisque 179--180 (1989), 163--184

View on Pith 1989

[50] [50]

Walther, U., Bernstein-Sato polynomial versus cohomology of the Milnor fiber for generic hyperplane arrangements, Compos.\ Math.\ 141 (2005), 121--145

View on Pith 2005

[51] [51]

Walther, U., The Jacobian module, the Milnor fiber, and the D -module generated by f^s (preprint)

View on Pith