Bost-Connes type systems for function fields

Beno\^it Jacob

REVIEW

Bost-Connes type systems for function fields

Benoît Jacob

Operator Algebras · Submitted 24 Feb 2006 · 35 references

Pith's verdict: The core function-field Bost–Connes construction and low-temperature KMS classification are new and largely sound, but the printed continuity proof for the Galois action has a fixable gap and the paper honestly flags two false statements in the type III part.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDmath/0602554 (version 5)

Pith IDPPEYSUW3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationBeno\^it Jacob. "Bost-Connes type systems for function fields." arXiv:math/0602554 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/PPEYSUW3

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Know this one. The paper builds a Bost–Connes type C*-dynamical system for arbitrary function fields from Hayes' sign-normalized rank-one Drinfeld modules, proves the low-temperature extremal KMS states are a principal homogeneous space for Gal(K/k), type I∞, with partition function the Dedekind zeta function, and a phase transition at β=1. That construction and the KMS classification are genuinely new, not a routine reparametrization. The presentation of the rational subalgebra and the special-value computations are careful and go beyond a transplant of the classical Bost–Connes proof.

The paper is honest about two acknowledged false statements: the natural-density Chebotarev formulation (Cor 1.1.5) and the high-temperature type III computation (Thm 4.5.8). The erratum correctly states that the right type is III_{q^{-β d_∞}} (due to Neshveyev–Rustad), and the false statements are confined to Section 4.5, so the uniqueness and phase-transition core survives.

There is a third soft spot not in the erratum. The stress-tester's concern about Prop 3.4.2 is correct. In the continuity proof, K0 is taken to be the field generated by the torsion points λ_i and their Galois conjugates, and then V=Gal(K/K0) is claimed to fix f0. But σ(e(φ_i,λ_i)) = e(σφ_i, σλ_i), and σ may move φ_i unless K0 contains the coefficient field H+ of the Hayes modules. For h(O)>1, H+ need not lie in the field generated by finitely many torsion points. So the written argument does not prove continuity. This is load-bearing because the continuous Galois action is used in Lemma 4.2.2 and Theorem 4.3.10. The fix is simple—adjoin H+ to K0—and then the standard ε/3 argument goes through. I do not think the classification is threatened, but the manuscript needs this correction.

Verdict: this deserves a serious referee. The main construction and low-temperature classification are important enough, and the acknowledged errors are localized and honestly reported. I would cite this paper for the construction, though I would double-check the continuity fix before relying on it. Reading-group yes: it is a good way to see function-field analogues of Bost–Connes done carefully, warts and all.

Referee report

Significance

If the main theorems stand after the necessary repairs, this is a substantial contribution: it gives a genuine function-field analog of the Bost–Connes system with a complete KMS classification, a Galois symmetry group from explicit class field theory, and computable special values. The proofs of the core classification theorems (Theorem 4.3.10 and Theorem 4.4.15) are detailed, and the erratum honestly circumscribes the damage of the false type III statement. Notably, the construction is parameter-free: the Galois action and partition function are computed rather than imposed. The significance is tempered by the fact that the printed version contains a false theorem, a false corollary, and an incomplete continuity proof, all of which must be fixed before the paper can be accepted.

Major objections (2)

[§3.4, Proposition 3.4.2] The continuity proof is incomplete. For f0 = Σ c_i μ_{a_i} e(φ_i,λ_i) μ_{b_i}^*, the field K0 is defined as the extension generated by the λ_i and their Gal(K/k)-conjugates. The assertion σf0 = f0 for all σ ∈ Gal(K/K0) requires σ(φ_i) = φ_i, but the coefficients of φ_i lie in H+, which need not be contained in K0 when h(O)>1. A nontrivial σ ∈ Gal(K/K0) can move φ_i to a different Hayes module, in which case ‖σf0−f0‖ = 1 is possible. This gap is load-bearing because the continuous Galois action is used in Lemma 4.2.2 and Theorem 4.3.10. The repair is straightforward: take K0 to be the finite Galois extension generated by H+ together with the λ_i and their conjugates; the standard ε/3 approximation then goes through.
[§4.5, Theorem 4.5.8; §1.1, Corollary 1.1.5] The paper as printed contains a false theorem and a false corollary, as the inserted errata acknowledge. Theorem 4.5.8 asserts that the high-temperature KMS_β state is of type III_{q^{-β}}, but the correct type is III_{q^{-β d∞}}; the proof depends on Lemma 4.5.5, whose statement and proof are admitted to be wrong, and on Corollary 1.1.5, which rests on the false natural-density formulation of the abelian Chebotarev theorem (Theorem 1.1.4). Even though the errata limit the impact to the type III computation, a journal version must remove or fully replace these false statements rather than retaining them 'for reference'. The abstract and introduction should also state the corrected type.

Minor objections (4)

[Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction still present the uncorrected type III_{q^{-β}} claim without qualification; readers who do not consult the erratum will be misled. Update these parts to the corrected type III_{q^{-β d∞}}.
[Abstract] The notation 'k^\abi' in the abstract appears to be a rendering artifact; the intended notation is likely k^{ab,∞} (the maximal abelian extension totally split at ∞).
[§4.5, Lemma 4.5.5] The erratum inserted inside Lemma 4.5.5's proof indicates that the proof erroneously assumes μ_p and μ_q belong to M[d]. The final version should be rewritten so that the corrected argument is presented coherently, not as a patchwork of original and corrected text.
[General] The text contains numerous typographical and OCR-like artifacts (e.g., '1 /greaterorequalslant1' in the abstract and odd spacing in displayed formulas). A careful proofreading pass is needed for the final version.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

The paper constructs a C*-dynamical system for every function field whose KMS states undergo a Galois-group phase transition at β=1, with the Dedekind zeta function as partition function.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that every global function field $k$, together with a chosen place $\infty$, carries a $C^*$-dynamical system $(C_{k,\infty},\sigma_t)$ analogous to the system originally built over the rational numbers. Its equilibrium (KMS) states undergo a phase transition at inverse temperature $\beta=1$: for $\beta\le1$ there is exactly one KMS state, while for $\beta>1$ the extremal KMS states form a principal homogeneous space under the Galois group $\operatorname{Gal}(K/k)$ of a canonically defined abelian extension $K$ lying between the maximal abelian extension of $k$ totally split at $\infty$ and the full maximal abelian extension. The partition function of the system is the Dedekind zeta function $\zeta_{k,\infty}$, i.e. the zeta function of $k$ with the factor at $\infty$ removed, and the low-temperature extremal states take values on a rational subalgebra that are expressible through partial zeta functions. The construction uses the explicit class field theory of function fields: torsion points of sign-normalized rank-one Drinfeld modules generate the relevant abelian extensions, and the Galois action is read off from their torsion. The paper records an erratum correcting the type of the unique high-temperature state from $\mathrm{III}_{q^{-\beta}}$ to $\mathrm{III}_{q^{-\beta d_\infty}}$, where $q$ is the cardinality of the constant subfield and $d_\infty$ is the degree of $\infty$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the groupoid $\mathcal{G}=\{(\chi,c)\in X\times F_O: c\in F_\chi\}$, with $X=\bigsqcup_{\varphi\in H(\mathrm{sgn})}X_\varphi$ the compact space of characters of the torsion groups of the chosen sign-normalized rank-one Drinfeld modules and $F_O$ the group of fractional ideals. The semigroup $IO$ of nonzero ideals acts on $X$ by precomposition with the isogeny maps $(a^{-1}*\varphi)_a$, and $C_{k,\infty}$ is the maximal groupoid $C^*$-algebra of $\mathcal{G}$, with time evolution $\sigma_t(f)(\chi,c)=N_c^{it}f(\chi,c)$. The dense rational subalgebra $\mathcal{H}$ is generated by isometries $\mu_a$ and point characters $e(\varphi,\lambda)$ and has an explicit presentation by relations (a)–(f). The admissible characters — those for which the partial $F_O$-action is as small as possible — give irreducible regular representations, and the low-temperature states are the Gibbs states $\phi_{\beta,\chi}=\zeta_{k,\infty}(\beta)^{-1}\operatorname{Tr}(\pi_\chi(\cdot)e^{-\beta H})$, where $H$ is diagonal with entries $\log N_a$.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a complete KMS classification for the $C^*$-dynamical system $C_{k,\infty}$, built as the maximal groupoid $C^*$-algebra of a groupoid encoding ideals and torsion-point characters. The algebra carries a faithful continuous action of $\operatorname{Gal}(K/k)$ that commutes with the time flow, and the fixed-point subalgebra has exactly one KMS state at every $\beta$. For $\beta>1$, every extremal KMS state is one of the Gibbs states $\phi_{\beta,\chi}$ attached to an admissible character $\chi\in X^{\mathrm{adm}}$; the map $\chi\mapsto\phi_{\beta,\chi}$ is a homeomorphism, and $\operatorname{Gal}(K/k)$ acts freely and transitively on the set of extremal states, all of which are factor states of type $\mathrm{I}_\infty$. For $\beta\le1$, there is a unique KMS state, so the system has spontaneous symmetry breaking at the critical inverse temperature $\beta=1$. The partition function is $\zeta_{k,\infty}(\beta)$, and special values of low-temperature states at the generators $e(\varphi,\lambda)$ are expressed in terms of partial zeta functions of $k$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction assumes one external input from explicit class field theory: the abelian extensions of $k$ are generated by torsion points of sign-normalized rank-one Drinfeld modules, and Artin automorphisms act on those torsion points by $\sigma_a(\lambda)=\varphi_a(\lambda)$; if that input were false or unavailable for some $k$ and $\infty$, the $C^*$-algebra, its Galois symmetry, and the KMS classification would not stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At inverse temperatures $\beta>1$, the Galois group $\operatorname{Gal}(K/k)$ is realized exactly as the space of pure thermodynamic phases, giving a dynamical incarnation of explicit class field theory.
At $\beta\le1$ the equilibrium state is unique, so spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs precisely at $\beta=1$; the high-temperature phase carries no Galois labelling.
The partition function of the system is $\zeta_{k,\infty}(\beta)$, so the Dedekind zeta function of $k$ with the place-$\infty$ factor removed is encoded as the trace of $e^{-\beta H}$ over the ideal lattice.
The low-temperature extremal state values at $e(\varphi,\lambda)$ yield partial zeta functions $\zeta^+_{k,\infty}$ and $\zeta^{p,\sigma}_{k,\infty}$, linking equilibrium data to ray-class zeta values.
The unique high-temperature state is a type $\mathrm{III}_{q^{-\beta d_\infty}}$ factor, so the degree of the distinguished place $\infty$ is read off from the modular type.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial: the same groupoid-plus-torsion pattern should work for other explicit class field theories, so one can try replacing Drinfeld modules by other rank-one arithmetic objects and expect analogous KMS classifications.
Editorial: because the paper's states take complex values, the Galois group permutes but does not act on the values themselves; defining states with values in a positive-characteristic field is a natural testbed for making the Galois action 'fabulous' in the sense the paper discusses.
Editorial: the corrected exponent $d_\infty$ suggests that the local degree of the distinguished place sets the modular scale of the high-temperature phase; varying $\infty$ while keeping $k$ fixed gives a concrete family of systems in which to test that dependence.
Editorial: the explicit relations (a)–(f) presenting $\mathcal{H}$ may admit an integral or $\mathbb{F}_q$-rational version, which would bring the partial-zeta special-value formulas into an arithmetic rather than complex-analytic setting.

Original abstract

We describe a construction which associates to any function field $k$ and any place $\infty$ of $k$ a $C^*$-dynamical system $(C_{k,\infty},\sigma_t)$ that is analogous to the Bost-Connes system associated to $\QQ$ and its archimedian place. Our construction relies on Hayes' explicit class field theory in terms of sign-normalized rank one Drinfel'd modules. We show that $C_{k,\infty}$ has a faithful continuous action of $\Gal(K/k)$, where $K$ is a certain field constructed by Hayes, such that $k^\abi\subset K\subset k^\ab$, where $k^\abi$ is the maximal abelian extension of $k$ that is totally split at $\infty$. We classify the extremal KMS$_\beta$ states of $(C_{k,\infty},\sigma_t)$ at any temperature $0<1/\beta<\infty$ and show that a phase transition with spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs at temperature $1/\beta=1$. At high temperature $1/\beta\geqslant 1$, there is a unique KMS$_\beta$ state. At low temperature $1/\beta<1$, the space of extremal KMS$_\beta$ states is principal homogeneous under $\Gal(K/k)$. Each such state is of type $\I_\infty$ and the partition function is the Dedekind zeta function $\zeta_{k,\infty}$. Moreover, we construct a "rational" *-subalgebra $\HH$, we give a presentation of $\HH$ and of $C_{k,\infty}$, and we show that the values of the low-temperature extremal KMS$_\beta$ states at certain elements of $\HH$ are related to special values of partial zeta functions.\n Erratum: This article wrongly claims that at high temperature $1/\beta\geqslant 1$, the unique KMS$_\beta$ state is of type $\III_{q^{-\beta}}$, where $q$ is the cardinal of the constant subfield of $k$. It has been shown by Neshveyev and Rustad \cite{NesRus12} that the correct type is $\III_{q^{-\beta d_\infty}}$ where $d_\infty$ is the degree of the place $\infty$. The original statements have been kept for reference, but errata have been inserted next to them.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,176 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.96 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.88 · compares with prior results 0.88 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v5. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We describe a construction which associates to any function field $k$ and any place $\infty$ of $k$ a $C^*$-dynamical system $(C_{k,\infty},\sigma_t)$ that is analogous to the Bost-Connes system associated to $\QQ$ and its archimedian place. Our construction relies on Hayes' explicit class field theory in terms of sign-normalized rank one Drinfel'd modules. We show that $C_{k,\infty}$ has a faithful continuous action of $\Gal(K/k)$, where $K$ is a certain field constructed by Hayes, such that $k^\abi\subset K\subset k^\ab$, where $k^\abi$ is the maximal abelian extension of $k$ that is totally split at $\infty$. We classify the extremal KMS$_\beta$ states of $(C_{k,\infty},\sigma_t)$ at any temperature $0<1/\beta<\infty$ and show that a phase transition with spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs at temperature $1/\beta=1$. At high temperature $1/\beta\geqslant 1$, there is a unique KMS$_\beta$ state. At low temperature $1/\beta<1$, the space of extremal KMS$_\beta$ states is principal homogeneous under $\Gal(K/k)$. Each such state is of type $\I_\infty$ and the partition function is the Dedekind zeta function $\zeta_{k,\infty}$. Moreover, we construct a "rational" *-subalgebra $\HH$, we give a presentation of $\HH$ and of $C_{k,\infty}$, and we show that the values of the low-temperature extremal KMS$_\beta$ states at certain elements of $\HH$ are related to special values of partial zeta functions.\n Erratum: This article wrongly claims that at high temperature $1/\beta\geqslant 1$, the unique KMS$_\beta$ state is of type $\III_{q^{-\beta}}$, where $q$ is the cardinal of the constant subfield of $k$. It has been shown by Neshveyev and Rustad \cite{NesRus12} that the correct type is $\III_{q^{-\beta d_\infty}}$ where $d_\infty$ is the degree of the place $\infty$. The original statements have been kept for reference, but errata have been inserted next to them.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We describe a construction which associates to any function field $k$ and any place $\infty$ of $k$ a $C^*$-dynamical system $(C_{k,\infty},\sigma_t)$ that is analogous to the Bost-Connes system associated to $\QQ$ and its archimedian place.	contribution 1.00	0.94	0.33	asserted 1.00
s1	Our construction relies on Hayes' explicit class field theory in terms of sign-normalized rank one Drinfel'd modules.	method 0.99	0.35	0.03	asserted 1.00
s2	We show that $C_{k,\infty}$ has a faithful continuous action of $\Gal(K/k)$, where $K$ is a certain field constructed by Hayes, such that $k^\abi\subset K\subset k^\ab$, where $k^\abi$ is the maximal abelian extension of $k$ that is totally split at $\infty$.	result 0.83	0.91	0.08	asserted 1.00
s3	We classify the extremal KMS$_\beta$ states of $(C_{k,\infty},\sigma_t)$ at any temperature $0<1/\beta<\infty$ and show that a phase transition with spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs at temperature $1/\beta=1$.	result 0.89	0.95	0.55	asserted 1.00
s4	At high temperature $1/\beta\geqslant 1$, there is a unique KMS$_\beta$ state.	result 1.00	0.91	0.11	asserted 1.00
s5	At low temperature $1/\beta<1$, the space of extremal KMS$_\beta$ states is principal homogeneous under $\Gal(K/k)$.	result 1.00	0.94	0.16	asserted 1.00
s6	Each such state is of type $\I_\infty$ and the partition function is the Dedekind zeta function $\zeta_{k,\infty}$.	result 1.00	0.88	0.11	asserted 1.00
s7	Moreover, we construct a "rational" *-subalgebra $\HH$, we give a presentation of $\HH$ and of $C_{k,\infty}$, and we show that the values of the low-temperature extremal KMS$_\beta$ states at certain elements of $\HH$ are related to special values of partial zeta functions.\n Erratum: This article wrongly claims that at high temperature $1/\beta\geqslant 1$, the unique KMS$_\beta$ state is of type $\III_{q^{-\beta}}$, where $q$ is the cardinal of the constant subfield of $k$.	contribution 0.40	0.92	0.11	asserted 1.00
s8	It has been shown by Neshveyev and Rustad \cite{NesRus12} that the correct type is $\III_{q^{-\beta d_\infty}}$ where $d_\infty$ is the degree of the place $\infty$.	limitation 0.52	0.04	0.05	asserted 1.00
s9	The original statements have been kept for reference, but errata have been inserted next to them.	limitation 0.92	0.56	0.02	asserted 0.97

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v5

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (35)

[1]

H. Araki and E. J. Woods. A classiﬁcation of factors. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. Kyoto , 4:51–130, 1968

View on Pith 1968
[2]

J. Arledge, M. Laca, and I. Raeburn. Semigroup crossed produ cts and hecke algebras arising from number ﬁelds. Doc. Math., 2:115–138, 1997

View on Pith 1997
[3]

J.-B. Bost and A. Connes. Hecke algebras, type III factors an d phase transitions with spontaneous symmetry breaking in number theory. Sel. Math., New Ser. , 1:411–457, 1995

View on Pith 1995
[4]

O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson. Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics I, II . Springer, 1981-2002

View on Pith 1981
[5]

J.W.S. Cassels and A. Fr¨ ohlich, editors. Algebraic Number Theory . Academic Press, 1967

View on Pith 1967
[6]

P. B. Cohen. A C∗-dynamical system with Dedekind zeta partition function and spont aneous symmetry breaking. Jour. th. nomb. Bordeaux , 11:15–30, 1999

View on Pith 1999
[7]

A. Connes. Une classiﬁcation des facteurs de type III. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) , 6:133–252, 1973

View on Pith 1973
[8]

A. Connes. Noncommutative Geometry. Academic Press, 1994

View on Pith 1994
[9]

A. Connes. Trace formula in noncommutative geometry and the z eros of the Riemann zeta function. Sel. Math., New Ser. , 5:29–106, 1999

View on Pith 1999
[10]

A. Connes, C. Consani, and M. Marcolli. Noncommutative geomet ry and motives: the thermody- namics of endomotives. arXiv:math.QA/0512138

View on Pith arXiv
[11]

A. Connes and M. Marcolli. Quantum statistical mechanics of Q-lattices (from physics to number theory via noncommutative geometry, part I). arXiv:math.NT/040 4128

View on Pith
[12]

A. Connes, M. Marcolli, and N. Ramachandran. KMS states and c omplex multiplication, part I. arXiv:math.OA/0501424

View on Pith arXiv
[13]

A. Connes, M. Marcolli, and N. Ramachandran. KMS states and c omplex multiplication, part II. to appear

View on Pith
[14]

K. R. Davidson. C∗-algebras by example . Fields Institute Monographs. Amer. Math. Soc., 1991

View on Pith 1991
[15]

D. Goss. Basic Structures of Function Field Arithmetic . Springer, 1991

View on Pith 1991
[16]

E. Ha and F. Paugam. A Bost-Connes-Marcolli system for Shimu ra varieties. IMRP, 5:237–286, 2005

View on Pith 2005
[17]

D. Harari and E. Leichtnam. Extension du ph´ enom` ene de bris ure spontan´ ee de sym´ etrie de Bost- Connes au cas des corps globaux quelconques. Sel. Math., New Ser. , 3:205–243, 1997

View on Pith 1997
[18]

D. R. Hayes. Explicit class ﬁeld theory for rational function ﬁeld s. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 189:77–91, 1974

View on Pith 1974
[19]

D. R. Hayes. Explicit class ﬁeld theory in global function ﬁelds. In G.-C. Rota, editor, Studies in Algebra and Number Theory , volume 6 of Adv. in Math. suppl. stud. , pages 173–217. Academic Press, 1979

View on Pith 1979
[20]

D. R. Hayes. A brief introduction to Drinfeld modules. In D. Goss et al., editor, The Arithmetic of Function Fields , pages 1–32. de Gruyter, 1992

View on Pith 1992
[21]

M. Jarden. The ˇCebotarev density theorem for function ﬁelds: An elementary app roach. Math. Ann., 261:467–475, 1982. 56

View on Pith 1982
[22]

V. F. R. Jones. Von Neumann algebras. Course at Berkeley Univ ersity, 2003

View on Pith 2003
[23]

A. L. Kholodenko. Statistical mechanics of 2+1 gravity from Rie mann zeta function and Alexander polynomial: Exact results. J. Geom. Phys. , 38:81–139, 2001

View on Pith 2001
[24]

M. Khoshkam and G. Skandalis. Regular representation of grou poid C∗-algebras and applications to inverse semigroups. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 546:47–72, 2002

View on Pith 2002
[25]

M. Laca. Semigroups of ∗-endomorphisms, Dirichlet series, and phase transitions. J. Funct. Anal. , 152:330–378, 1998

View on Pith 1998
[26]

M. Laca and I. Raeburn. The ideal structure of the Hecke C∗-algebra of Bost and Connes. Math. Ann., 318(3):433–451, 2000

View on Pith 2000
[27]

M. Laca and M. van Frankenhuijsen. Phase transitions on Heck eC∗-algebras and class-ﬁeld theory over Q. arXiv:math.OA/0410305

View on Pith arXiv
[28]

N. Larsen and I. Raeburn. Representations of Hecke algebra s and dilations of semigroup cross product. J. London Math. Soc. (2) , 66(1):198–212, 2002

View on Pith 2002
[29]

S. Neshveyev. Ergodicity of the action of the positive rationals on the group of ﬁnite adeles and the Bost-Connes phase transition theorem. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 130(10):2999–3003, 2002

View on Pith 2002
[30]

S. Neshveyev and S. Rustad. Bost-Connes systems associat ed with function ﬁelds. arXiv preprint: 1112.5826v2

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[31]

G. K. Pedersen. C∗-algebras and their automorphism groups . Academic Press, 1979

View on Pith 1979
[32]

J. Renault. A groupoid approach to C∗-algebras. Number 793 in Lecture Notes in Math. Springer, 1980

View on Pith 1980
[33]

V. S. Sunder. An invitation to von Neumann algebras . Universitext. Springer, 1987

View on Pith 1987
[34]

M. Takesaki. Theory of Operator Algebras I, II, III . Springer, 1979-2003

View on Pith 1979
[35]

A. Weil. Sur les courbes alg´ ebriques et les vari´ et´ es qui s’en d´ eduisent. Hermann, 1948. Beno ˆ ıt Jacob jacob.benoit.1@gmail.com 57

View on Pith 1948

How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

H. Araki and E. J. Woods. A classiﬁcation of factors. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. Kyoto , 4:51–130, 1968

View on Pith 1968

[2] [2]

J. Arledge, M. Laca, and I. Raeburn. Semigroup crossed produ cts and hecke algebras arising from number ﬁelds. Doc. Math., 2:115–138, 1997

View on Pith 1997

[3] [3]

J.-B. Bost and A. Connes. Hecke algebras, type III factors an d phase transitions with spontaneous symmetry breaking in number theory. Sel. Math., New Ser. , 1:411–457, 1995

View on Pith 1995

[4] [4]

O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson. Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics I, II . Springer, 1981-2002

View on Pith 1981

[5] [5]

J.W.S. Cassels and A. Fr¨ ohlich, editors. Algebraic Number Theory . Academic Press, 1967

View on Pith 1967

[6] [6]

P. B. Cohen. A C∗-dynamical system with Dedekind zeta partition function and spont aneous symmetry breaking. Jour. th. nomb. Bordeaux , 11:15–30, 1999

View on Pith 1999

[7] [7]

A. Connes. Une classiﬁcation des facteurs de type III. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) , 6:133–252, 1973

View on Pith 1973

[8] [8]

A. Connes. Noncommutative Geometry. Academic Press, 1994

View on Pith 1994

[9] [9]

A. Connes. Trace formula in noncommutative geometry and the z eros of the Riemann zeta function. Sel. Math., New Ser. , 5:29–106, 1999

View on Pith 1999

[10] [10]

A. Connes, C. Consani, and M. Marcolli. Noncommutative geomet ry and motives: the thermody- namics of endomotives. arXiv:math.QA/0512138

View on Pith arXiv

[11] [11]

A. Connes and M. Marcolli. Quantum statistical mechanics of Q-lattices (from physics to number theory via noncommutative geometry, part I). arXiv:math.NT/040 4128

View on Pith

[12] [12]

A. Connes, M. Marcolli, and N. Ramachandran. KMS states and c omplex multiplication, part I. arXiv:math.OA/0501424

View on Pith arXiv

[13] [13]

A. Connes, M. Marcolli, and N. Ramachandran. KMS states and c omplex multiplication, part II. to appear

View on Pith

[14] [14]

K. R. Davidson. C∗-algebras by example . Fields Institute Monographs. Amer. Math. Soc., 1991

View on Pith 1991

[15] [15]

D. Goss. Basic Structures of Function Field Arithmetic . Springer, 1991

View on Pith 1991

[16] [16]

E. Ha and F. Paugam. A Bost-Connes-Marcolli system for Shimu ra varieties. IMRP, 5:237–286, 2005

View on Pith 2005

[17] [17]

D. Harari and E. Leichtnam. Extension du ph´ enom` ene de bris ure spontan´ ee de sym´ etrie de Bost- Connes au cas des corps globaux quelconques. Sel. Math., New Ser. , 3:205–243, 1997

View on Pith 1997

[18] [18]

D. R. Hayes. Explicit class ﬁeld theory for rational function ﬁeld s. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 189:77–91, 1974

View on Pith 1974

[19] [19]

D. R. Hayes. Explicit class ﬁeld theory in global function ﬁelds. In G.-C. Rota, editor, Studies in Algebra and Number Theory , volume 6 of Adv. in Math. suppl. stud. , pages 173–217. Academic Press, 1979

View on Pith 1979

[20] [20]

D. R. Hayes. A brief introduction to Drinfeld modules. In D. Goss et al., editor, The Arithmetic of Function Fields , pages 1–32. de Gruyter, 1992

View on Pith 1992

[21] [21]

M. Jarden. The ˇCebotarev density theorem for function ﬁelds: An elementary app roach. Math. Ann., 261:467–475, 1982. 56

View on Pith 1982

[22] [22]

V. F. R. Jones. Von Neumann algebras. Course at Berkeley Univ ersity, 2003

View on Pith 2003

[23] [23]

A. L. Kholodenko. Statistical mechanics of 2+1 gravity from Rie mann zeta function and Alexander polynomial: Exact results. J. Geom. Phys. , 38:81–139, 2001

View on Pith 2001

[24] [24]

M. Khoshkam and G. Skandalis. Regular representation of grou poid C∗-algebras and applications to inverse semigroups. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 546:47–72, 2002

View on Pith 2002

[25] [25]

M. Laca. Semigroups of ∗-endomorphisms, Dirichlet series, and phase transitions. J. Funct. Anal. , 152:330–378, 1998

View on Pith 1998

[26] [26]

M. Laca and I. Raeburn. The ideal structure of the Hecke C∗-algebra of Bost and Connes. Math. Ann., 318(3):433–451, 2000

View on Pith 2000

[27] [27]

M. Laca and M. van Frankenhuijsen. Phase transitions on Heck eC∗-algebras and class-ﬁeld theory over Q. arXiv:math.OA/0410305

View on Pith arXiv

[28] [28]

N. Larsen and I. Raeburn. Representations of Hecke algebra s and dilations of semigroup cross product. J. London Math. Soc. (2) , 66(1):198–212, 2002

View on Pith 2002

[29] [29]

S. Neshveyev. Ergodicity of the action of the positive rationals on the group of ﬁnite adeles and the Bost-Connes phase transition theorem. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 130(10):2999–3003, 2002

View on Pith 2002

[30] [30]

S. Neshveyev and S. Rustad. Bost-Connes systems associat ed with function ﬁelds. arXiv preprint: 1112.5826v2

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[31] [31]

G. K. Pedersen. C∗-algebras and their automorphism groups . Academic Press, 1979

View on Pith 1979

[32] [32]

J. Renault. A groupoid approach to C∗-algebras. Number 793 in Lecture Notes in Math. Springer, 1980

View on Pith 1980

[33] [33]

V. S. Sunder. An invitation to von Neumann algebras . Universitext. Springer, 1987

View on Pith 1987

[34] [34]

M. Takesaki. Theory of Operator Algebras I, II, III . Springer, 1979-2003

View on Pith 1979

[35] [35]

A. Weil. Sur les courbes alg´ ebriques et les vari´ et´ es qui s’en d´ eduisent. Hermann, 1948. Beno ˆ ıt Jacob jacob.benoit.1@gmail.com 57

View on Pith 1948