RECORD
An Extension of the Foata Map to Standard Young Tableaux
Combinatorics · Submitted 27 Nov 2006
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We prove that this statistic has the same distribution over SYT(\lambda) as the major index statistic by exhibiting a bijection on SYT(\lambda) in the spirit of the Foata map on permutations.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We define an inversion statistic on standard Young tableaux. We prove that this statistic has the same distribution over SYT(\lambda) as the major index statistic by exhibiting a bijection on SYT(\lambda) in the spirit of the Foata map on permutations.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We define an inversion statistic on standard Young tableaux. | contribution 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.05 | asserted 0.99 |
| s1 | We prove that this statistic has the same distribution over SYT(\lambda) as the major index statistic by exhibiting a bijection on SYT(\lambda) in the spirit of the Foata map on permutations. | result 0.72 | 0.96 | 0.89 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We define an inversion statistic on standard Young tableaux. We prove that this statistic has the same distribution over SYT(\lambda) as the major index statistic by exhibiting a bijection on SYT(\lambda) in the spirit of the Foata map on permutations.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.