Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Holonomy groups and special geometric structures of pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds of index 2

Differential Geometry · Submitted 14 Dec 2006

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This gives the classification of holonomy algebras for pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds of index 2.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDmath/0612392 (version 1)
Pith IDXPCQFZU3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAnton S. Galaev. "Holonomy groups and special geometric structures of pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds of index 2." arXiv:math/0612392 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/XPCQFZU3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 9,455 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.71 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The problem of classification of connected holonomy groups (equivalently of holonomy algebras) for pseudo-Riemannian manifolds is open. The classification of Riemannian holonomy algebras is a classical result. The classification of Lorentzian holonomy algebras was obtained recently. In the present paper weakly-irreducible not irreducible subalgebras of $\su(1,n+1)$ ($n\geq 0$) are classified. Weakly-irreducible not irreducible holonomy algebras of pseudo-K\"ahlerian and special pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds are classified. An example of metric for each possible holonomy algebra is given. This gives the classification of holonomy algebras for pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds of index 2. Finally we consider some examples and applications. We describe examples of 4-dimensional Lie groups with left-invariant pseudo-K\"ahlerian metrics and determine their holonomy algebras. We use our classification of holonomy algebras to give a new proof for the classification of simply connected pseudo-K\"ahlerian symmetric spaces of index 2 with weakly-irreducible not irreducible holonomy algebras. We consider time-like cones over Lorentzian Sasaki manifolds. These cones are also pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds of index 2. We describe the local DeRham-Wu decomposition of the cone in terms of the initial Lorentzian Sasaki manifold and we describe all possible weakly-irreducible not irreducible holonomy algebras of such cones.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The problem of classification of connected holonomy groups (equivalently of holonomy algebras) for pseudo-Riemannian manifolds is open. background 0.52 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 The classification of Riemannian holonomy algebras is a classical result. background 1.00 0.03 0.01 asserted 1.00
s2 The classification of Lorentzian holonomy algebras was obtained recently. background 0.99 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 In the present paper weakly-irreducible not irreducible subalgebras of $\su(1,n+1)$ ($n\geq 0$) are classified. contribution 0.87 0.92 0.16 asserted 1.00
s4 Weakly-irreducible not irreducible holonomy algebras of pseudo-K\"ahlerian and special pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds are classified. result 0.54 0.94 0.55 asserted 1.00
s5 An example of metric for each possible holonomy algebra is given. contribution 0.64 0.94 0.06 asserted 1.00
s6 This gives the classification of holonomy algebras for pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds of index 2. result 0.64 0.93 0.81 asserted 1.00
s7 Finally we consider some examples and applications. contribution 0.93 0.74 0.02 asserted 0.84
s8 We describe examples of 4-dimensional Lie groups with left-invariant pseudo-K\"ahlerian metrics and determine their holonomy algebras. contribution 0.92 0.96 0.03 asserted 1.00
s9 We use our classification of holonomy algebras to give a new proof for the classification of simply connected pseudo-K\"ahlerian symmetric spaces of index 2 with weakly-irreducible not irreducible holonomy algebras. contribution 0.68 0.95 0.09 asserted 1.00
s10 We consider time-like cones over Lorentzian Sasaki manifolds. contribution 1.00 0.70 0.02 asserted 0.90
s11 These cones are also pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds of index 2. contribution 0.58 0.50 0.04 asserted 1.00
s12 We describe the local DeRham-Wu decomposition of the cone in terms of the initial Lorentzian Sasaki manifold and we describe all possible weakly-irreducible not irreducible holonomy algebras of such cones. result 0.58 0.94 0.07 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The problem of classification of connected holonomy groups (equivalently of holonomy algebras) for pseudo-Riemannian manifolds is open. The classification of Riemannian holonomy algebras is a classical result. The classification of Lorentzian holonomy algebras was obtained recently. In the present paper weakly-irreducible not irreducible subalgebras of $\su(1,n+1)$ ($n\geq 0$) are classified. Weakly-irreducible not irreducible holonomy algebras of pseudo-K\"ahlerian and special pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds are classified. An example of metric for each possible holonomy algebra is given. This gives the classification of holonomy algebras for pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds of index 2. Finally we consider some examples and applications. We describe examples of 4-dimensional Lie groups with left-invariant pseudo-K\"ahlerian metrics and determine their holonomy algebras. We use our classification of holonomy algebras to give a new proof for the classification of simply connected pseudo-K\"ahlerian symmetric spaces of index 2 with weakly-irreducible not irreducible holonomy algebras. We consider time-like cones over Lorentzian Sasaki manifolds. These cones are also pseudo-K\"ahlerian manifolds of index 2. We describe the local DeRham-Wu decomposition of the cone in terms of the initial Lorentzian Sasaki manifold and we describe all possible weakly-irreducible not irreducible holonomy algebras of such cones.

Human review
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.