RECORD
Homology of subgroups of right-angled Artin groups
Group Theory · Submitted 24 Dec 2006
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We describe the (co)homology of a certain family of normal subgroups of right-angled Artin groups that contain the commutator subgroup, as modules over the quotient group.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We describe the (co)homology of a certain family of normal subgroups of right-angled Artin groups that contain the commutator subgroup, as modules over the quotient group. We do so in terms of (skew) commutative algebra of squarefree monomial ideals.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We describe the (co)homology of a certain family of normal subgroups of right-angled Artin groups that contain the commutator subgroup, as modules over the quotient group. | contribution 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.69 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | We do so in terms of (skew) commutative algebra of squarefree monomial ideals. | method 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.15 | asserted 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We describe the (co)homology of a certain family of normal subgroups of right-angled Artin groups that contain the commutator subgroup, as modules over the quotient group. We do so in terms of (skew) commutative algebra of squarefree monomial ideals.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.