REVIEW 3 cited by
Polarization contributions to the spin-dependence of the effective interaction in neutron matter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We calculate the modification of the effective interaction of particles on the Fermi surface due to polarization contributions, with particular attention to spin-dependent forces. In addition to the standard spin-spin, tensor and spin-orbit forces, spin non-conserving effective interactions are induced by screening in the particle-hole channels. Furthermore, a novel long-wavelength tensor force is generated. We compute the polarization contributions to second order in the low-momentum interaction V_{low k} and find that the medium-induced spin-orbit interaction leads to a reduction of the 3P2 pairing gap for neutrons in the interior of neutron stars.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Renormalization-group approach to the Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity: Amplification of the pairing gap from $\ell^4$ to $\ell$
The renormalization group with the zero-sound diagram predicts the Kohn-Luttinger pairing gap exponent scales as -ℓ instead of the standard -ℓ^4.
-
Revealing the internal magnetic field configuration of magnetars via their associated periodic signals
Using observed precession periods and surface temperatures, the authors constrain the internal fields of four magnetars and two FRB hosts, finding toroidal field strengths of order 10^15 G and a toroidal distribution ...
-
Axions at the meV Crossroads: Theory, Cosmology, Astrophysics, and Experiments
The meV axion window is presented as a coherent, cross-validated search program in which string theory, stellar cooling, dark matter, and new detector concepts converge on the same mass range.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.