Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Complete Entanglement-Based Communication With Security

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Arindam Mitra

General Physics · Submitted 21 Jul 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It is discussed that complete entanglement based communication even with security is possible in that scenario.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.96 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDphysics/0007074 (version 3)
Pith IDI755URES, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationArindam Mitra. "Complete Entanglement-Based Communication With Security." arXiv:physics/0007074 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/I755URES
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,879 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.17 · human participants 0.04 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

If, due to some catastrophe, our classical communication system is destroyed but quantum entangled state survived, in that entanglement age, it is widely believed, the whole world would be communication less. It is discussed that complete entanglement based communication even with security is possible in that scenario. In this context, the notion of cheating-free Bell's inequality test is introduced.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 If, due to some catastrophe, our classical communication system is destroyed but quantum entangled state survived, in that entanglement age, it is widely believed, the whole world would be communication less. background 0.99 0.04 0.04 speculative 0.41
s1 It is discussed that complete entanglement based communication even with security is possible in that scenario. contribution 0.80 0.29 0.84 hedged possibility 0.96
s2 In this context, the notion of cheating-free Bell's inequality test is introduced. contribution 0.99 0.66 0.09 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.53 · evidence from argument 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

If, due to some catastrophe, our classical communication system is destroyed but quantum entangled state survived, in that entanglement age, it is widely believed, the whole world would be communication less. It is discussed that complete entanglement based communication even with security is possible in that scenario. In this context, the notion of cheating-free Bell's inequality test is introduced.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.