pith. sign in

arxiv: physics/0403046 · v1 · submitted 2004-03-05 · ⚛️ physics.data-an · hep-ex

A note on Delta ln L = -1/2 Errors

classification ⚛️ physics.data-an hep-ex
keywords bartlettconstructionerrorslikelihoodmeasurementsimpleaccuracyapproximation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The points at which the log likelihood falls by 1/2 from its maximum value are often used to give the `errors' on a result, i.e. the 68% central confidence interval. The validity of this is examined for two simple cases: a lifetime measurement and a Poisson measurement. Results are compared with the exact Neyman construction and with the simple Bartlett approximation. It is shown that the accuracy of the log likelihood method is poor, and the Bartlett construction explains why it is flawed.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.