Multipole vector solitons in nonlocal nonlinear media

D. Mihalache; Lluis Torner; Victor A. Vysloukh; Yaroslav V. Kartashov

REVIEW

Multipole vector solitons in nonlocal nonlinear media

Yaroslav V. Kartashov, Victor A. Vysloukh, D. Mihalache, Lluis Torner

Optics · Submitted 3 Mar 2006 · 48 references

Pith's verdict: A plausible and honestly written numerical Letter that identifies a new stabilization mechanism for multipole solitons, but the stability evidence relies only on finite-time noisy propagation, so the quantitative threshold claims are not fully established.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDphysics/0603018 (version 1)

Pith IDCAKF23RV, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationD. Mihalache, Lluis Torner, Victor A. Vysloukh, Yaroslav V. Kartashov. "Multipole vector solitons in nonlocal nonlinear media." arXiv:physics/0603018 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/CAKF23RV

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The short version: this is a plausible numerical Letter with a potentially important qualitative claim — the shape of the nonlocal response (Helmholtz vs Gaussian) controls whether scalar multipoles can be stable, and vectorial coupling with a nodeless component can stabilize them in the Helmholtz case. It deserves a careful referee, but the stability evidence is thinner than the title suggests.

What I like: the model is the standard nonlocal NLS with a K0 response, appropriate for nematic liquid crystals and plasmas. The equations are clean, and the numerical method (relaxation for profiles, split-step for propagation) is standard practice. The paper is honest about not being able to map the full stability domain at small d. The claim that the response function shape matters is a genuinely useful contribution, and the vectorial coupling mechanism is a natural but non-obvious extension.

The soft spot is the stability analysis. There is no linear stability spectrum anywhere. The stability domain in Fig. 2 is built entirely from finite-distance noisy propagation runs. That is a real gap, especially near the threshold b2^cr, where unstable eigenvalues emerge from zero, so growth rates can be arbitrarily small — a run of 500 diffraction lengths cannot rule out a slow instability. The paper's own admission that the instability domain structure is complex at small d reinforces this concern. The contrast with the Gaussian case is asserted from the literature, not benchmarked with the same code, and no terminal propagation distance is given for the 'stable' cases. These are not fatal — the qualitative trend may well be correct — but they mean the central claim is not quantitatively established.

Who is this for? Specialists in nonlocal solitons, particularly people working on liquid crystals or plasmas. A reader who needs the precise threshold curve should treat it as approximate; a reader who wants to know whether vector coupling is worth trying experimentally will find a useful hint.

I would send it to peer review for a specialty journal, with a request for a linear stability analysis or at least a much longer propagation time and a careful scan of growth rates near threshold. Not a desk reject.

Referee report

Significance

The claimed result is significant if it holds: it identifies the spatial shape of the nonlocal response as a qualitative control of higher-order soliton stability and proposes vectorial coupling as a stabilization mechanism in physically relevant media such as liquid crystals and plasmas. The paper also makes a concrete falsifiable prediction, namely an upper threshold in energy flow for stable vector multipoles that grows with nonlocality. The work is clearly presented in its physical motivation, and the numerical profiles and propagation examples are consistent with the stated existence domain. However, the stability conclusion is supported only by finite-distance simulations, so the strength of the central claim currently exceeds the evidence provided.

Major objections (3)

[Propagation dynamics paragraph; Fig. 3] Stability is inferred entirely from split-step propagation of noise-perturbed inputs; no linear stability spectrum, no growth rates, and no terminal propagation distances are reported. The only explicit distance mentioned is xi around 540 in the kaleidoscopic example, and the text defines 'stable' as retaining structure over 'indefinitely long distances' without a quantitative criterion. Near the threshold b2^cr, any unstable mode can in principle have an arbitrarily small growth rate, so finite-distance noisy propagation cannot distinguish a stable soliton from a weakly unstable one over the computed window. Since the stability domain in Figs. 2(c) and 2(f) and the central stabilization claim rest on this criterion, please add either a linearized stability analysis or quantitative convergence diagnostics, such as reported terminal distances, time evolution of the deviation from the stationary profile, and the dependence of the inferred stability boundary on the propagation horizon.
[Fig. 2(c), 2(f) and the discussion following Eq. (1)] The critical propagation constant b2^cr is the central quantitative result, but the paper states that for small d the 'topological structure of the instability domain becomes complex' and that b2^cr was determined only from a certain minimal d value. This is a limitation in a load-bearing quantitative claim: the monotonic increase of b2^cr with d, and the resulting maximum-energy-flow threshold, are not fully established in the quasi-local limit. Please complete the threshold curves or state explicitly the d-range in which the quantitative threshold is valid, and describe the criterion used in the region where the instability domain is complex.
[Second paragraph after Eq. (1), scalar-case discussion] The assertion that 'all two-dimensional scalar multipole solitons corresponding to the Helmholtz response are unstable' is a strong negative claim that is used as the motivation for the vectorial-coupling mechanism. However, no scalar-case propagation figures, no scalar stability analysis, and no quantitative instability rate are shown. Because the contrast with the Gaussian-response result of Ref. [16] depends on this claim, it needs direct support: at minimum, representative scalar propagation results with a stated instability criterion, or a quantitative growth-rate estimate for the scalar modes.

Minor objections (4)

[Eq. (1)] The displayed equations are badly garbled in the manuscript; the Helmholtz equation for the nonlinear refractive index n should be shown cleanly, with a consistent definition of the nonlocality parameter d.
[Abstract and Fig. 2] The abstract states the result as a threshold in energy flow, while the figures report a threshold in the propagation constant b2. Since the energy flow U is monotonic in b2 (Fig. 2(a)), the logical link should be stated explicitly for the reader.
[Fig. 3 caption] The noise variance sigma^2 = 0.01 is called 'considerable input noise,' but the amplitude of the perturbation relative to the soliton power is not quantified; an order-of-magnitude statement would make the stability test more interpretable.
[References] Ref. [16] is cited as an arXiv preprint; if a published version exists at the time of submission, it should be cited instead.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

This paper shows that in nonlocal media with Helmholtz-type nonlinear responses, scalar multipole solitons are always unstable, but vector solitons pairing a nodeless component with a multipole component can be stabilized below an…

The reading

The paper asks whether multipole solitons—bound states of several out-of-phase bright spots—can survive in bulk nonlocal nonlinear media whose response function is of Helmholtz type, the kind found in nematic liquid crystals and plasmas. It establishes that all such scalar multipole solitons are unstable, and that stability can be restored by coupling the multipole to a mutually incoherent nodeless component, forming a vector soliton. The stabilization works only when the energy flow carried by the multipole component stays below a maximum value, and that maximum grows with the nonlocality degree. A sympathetic reader should care because the result ties the possibility of stable higher-order solitons to the physical shape of the nonlocal response, and gives a concrete route to realizing them.

What carries the argument

The central object is the vector soliton composed of two mutually incoherent components, a nodeless field $w_1$ and a multipole field $w_2$, coupled through a shared nonlinear refractive index $n$ formed by convolving the total intensity $|q_1|^2+|q_2|^2$ with the Helmholtz response function $G_d(\eta,\zeta)=\frac{1}{2\pi}K_0\!\left(\frac{\sqrt{\eta^2+\zeta^2}}{d}\right)$, where $K_0$ is the zero-order MacDonald function. This response has a logarithmic singularity at the origin and decays slowly, in contrast to the Gaussian response used in earlier work on stable dipole solitons. The mechanism that carries the argument is vectorial coupling: the nodeless component creates a smooth, broad waveguide in which the multipole component can survive, but stability holds only when the multipole's energy flow is below a threshold $b_2^{\rm cr}$ that increases with the nonlocality degree $d$.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a bulk medium with Helmholtz-type nonlocal response, scalar multipole solitons are always unstable, while vector solitons made of a nodeless and a multipole component that are mutually incoherent can be stable. The paper demonstrates this for dipole, quadrupole, and hexapole vector solitons, showing that they exist in a finite band of propagation constants and that stability sets in once the multipole component's energy flow falls below a critical value that increases monotonically with the nonlocality degree $d$. At the lower cutoff the vector soliton reduces to the scalar nodeless soliton; at the upper cutoff it reduces to the unstable scalar multipole, so the stability domain is bounded by the two scalar limits. The paper therefore argues that the spatial shape of the nonlocal response function—not merely its range—determines whether higher-order solitons can be stable, and that vectorial coupling is a sufficient stabilization mechanism even for a response with a logarithmic singularity and slow decay.

Load-bearing premise

Stability is judged by finite-distance numerical propagation (about $\xi \approx 540$) under added noise, so the central claim would collapse if slowly growing instabilities appear only after much longer propagation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In Helmholtz-type nonlocal media, any stable higher-order bright state must include a nodeless component; scalar multipoles alone will break up during propagation.
The energy-flow threshold for stabilization is set by the nonlocality degree, so tuning the nonlocality changes the window in which vector multipole solitons can be observed.
At the edges of the existence domain, vector solitons degenerate into their scalar constituents, so the stability domain is framed by the unstable scalar multipole and the stable scalar nodeless soliton.
The contrast with Gaussian-response media shows that the shape of the nonlocal response function, not just its range, controls whether bound states of bright spots can be stable.
Because the model describes partially ionized plasmas and nematic liquid crystals, the predicted stabilization should be observable in those physical settings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The stabilization mechanism should be testable in nematic liquid crystals with two mutually incoherent beams: the nodeless beam sets the waveguide and the multipole beam should survive far longer than its scalar counterpart.
If the response shape matters this strongly, other nonlocal kernels (exponential, rectangular, or power-law tails) likely produce different stability thresholds; mapping those thresholds would isolate which feature of the tail controls stabilization.
The kaleidoscopic near-revivals seen in weakly unstable hexapoles suggest an oscillatory instability that is not monotonically growing, pointing to a possible intermediate regime where a state is technically unstable but practically long-lived.
The finite-distance stability criterion used here could be checked against a full linear-stability eigenvalue calculation on the same soliton families, which would sharpen the stability boundary for each multipole order.

Original abstract

We show that multipole solitons can be made stable via vectorial coupling in bulk nonlocal nonlinear media. Such vector solitons are composed of mutually incoherent nodeless and multipole components jointly inducing a nonlinear refractive index profile. We found that stabilization of the otherwise highly unstable multipoles occurs below a maximum energy flow. Such threshold is determined by the nonlocality degree.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,490 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.76 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.27 · compares with prior results 0.13 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We show that multipole solitons can be made stable via vectorial coupling in bulk nonlocal nonlinear media. Such vector solitons are composed of mutually incoherent nodeless and multipole components jointly inducing a nonlinear refractive index profile. We found that stabilization of the otherwise highly unstable multipoles occurs below a maximum energy flow. Such threshold is determined by the nonlocality degree.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We show that multipole solitons can be made stable via vectorial coupling in bulk nonlocal nonlinear media.	result 0.74	0.92	0.86	asserted 1.00
s1	Such vector solitons are composed of mutually incoherent nodeless and multipole components jointly inducing a nonlinear refractive index profile.	contribution 0.78	0.48	0.10	asserted 1.00
s2	We found that stabilization of the otherwise highly unstable multipoles occurs below a maximum energy flow.	result 1.00	0.94	0.31	asserted 1.00
s3	Such threshold is determined by the nonlocality degree.	result 0.89	0.72	0.08	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.49 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (48)

[1]

M. Peccianti, K. A. Brzdakiewicz, and G. Assanto, “Nonlocal spatial soliton interactions in nematic liquid crystals”, Opt. Lett. 27, 1460 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[2]

M. Peccianti, C. Conti, and G. Assanto, “Interplay between nonlocality and nonlinearity in nematic liquid crystals”, Opt. Lett. 30, 415 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[3]

F. Derrien, J. F. Henninot, M. Warenghem, and G. Abbate, “A thermal (2D+1) spatial optical soliton in a dye doped liquid crystal,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2, 332 (2000)

View on Pith 2000
[4]

A. G. Litvak, V. A. Mironov, G. M. Fraiman, and A. D. Yunakovskii, “Thermal self-effect of waves in plasma with a nonlocal nonlinearity”, Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 1, 31 (1975)

View on Pith 1975
[5]

A. V. Mamaev, A. A. Zozulya, V. K. Mezentsev, D. Z. Anderson, and M. Saffman, “Bound dipole solitary solutions in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media”, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1110 (1997)

View on Pith 1997
[6]

W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, J. J. Rasmussen, and J. Wyller, “Modulational instability in nonlocal nonlinear Kerr media”, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016612 (2001)

View on Pith 2001
[7]

J. Wyller, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, and J. J. Rasmussen, “Generic features of modulational instability in nonlocal Kerr media”, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066615 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[8]

C. Rotschild, O. Cohen, O. Manela, M. Segev, and T. Carmon, “Solitons in nonlinear media with an infinite range of nonlocality: first observation of coherent elliptic solitons and of vortex-ring solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 213904 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[9]

W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, J. Wyller, J. J. Rasmussen, and D. Edmundson, “Modulational instability, solitons and beam propagation in spatially nonlocal nonlinear media,” J. Opt. B: Quantum and Semiclass. Opt. 6, S288 (2004)

View on Pith 2004
[10]

and observed in [11]. Th e maximum number of solitons that can be packed into stable bound state depends on the nature of nonlocal response [12]. Bound states of dark solitons were addressed in [13,14]. Two-dimensional bright solitons also for m bound states in nonlo cal media [5,15]. Recently, stable dipole solitons in a mediu m with Gaussian response fu...

View on Pith
[12]

X. Hutsebaut, C. Cambournac, M. Haelterman, A. Adamski, and K. Neyts, “Single-component higher-order mode solitons in liquid crystals” Opt. Commun. 233, 211 (2004). 5

View on Pith 2004
[13]

Z. Xu, Y. V. Kartashov, and L. Torner, “Upper threshold for stability of multipole-mode solitons in nonlocal nonlinear media,” Opt. Lett. 30, 3171 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[14]

N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, J. J. Rasmussen, and P. L. Christiansen, “Attraction of nonlocal dark optical solitons” Opt. Lett. 29, 286 (2004)

View on Pith 2004
[15]

A. Dreischuh, D. N. Neshev, D. E. Petersen, O. Bang, and W. Krolikowski, “Observation of attraction between dark solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 043901 (2006)

View on Pith 2006
[18]

M. Mitchell, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of multihump multimode solitons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4657 (1998)

View on Pith 1998
[19]

E. A. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, D. V. Skryabin, and W. J. Firth, “Stability of multihump optical solitons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 296 (1999)

View on Pith 1999
[20]

J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, V. Perez-Garcia, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Dipole-mode vector solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 82 (2000)

View on Pith 2000
[21]

W. Krolikowski, E. A. Ostrovskaya, C. Weilnau, M. Geisser, G. McCarthy, Y. S. Kivshar, C. Denz, and B. Luther-Davies, “Observation of dipole-mode vector solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1424 (2000)

View on Pith 2000
[22]

T. Carmon, C. Anastassiou, S. Lan, D. Kip, Z. H. Musslimani, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of two-dimensional multimode solitons,” Opt. Lett. 25, 1113 (2000)

View on Pith 2000
[23]

A. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, E. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, W. Krolikowski, B. Luther-Davies, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, and V. Perez-Garcia, “Multipole spatial vector solitons,” Opt. Lett. 26, 435 (2001)

View on Pith 2001
[24]

D. Neshev, G. McCarthy, W. Krolikowski, E. A. Ostrovskaya, G. F. Calvo, F. Agullo-Lopez, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Dipole-mode vector solitons in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media,” Opt. Lett. 26, 1185 (2001). 6

View on Pith 2001
[25]

A. S. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, E. A. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, G. McCarthy, W. Krolikowski, and B. Luther-Davies, “Multipole composite spatial solitons: theory and experiment,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 586 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[26]

J. Yang and D. E. Pelinovsky, “Stable vortex and dipole vector solitons in a saturable nonlinear medium,” Phys. Rev. E 67, 016608 (2003). 7 References without titles

View on Pith 2003
[27]

M. Peccianti, K. A. Brzdakiewicz, and G. Assanto, Opt. Lett. 27, 1460 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[28]

M. Peccianti, C. Conti, and G. Assanto, Opt. Lett. 30, 415 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[29]

F. Derrien, J. F. Henninot, M. Warenghem, and G. Abbate, J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2, 332 (2000)

View on Pith 2000
[30]

A. G. Litvak, V. A. Mironov, G. M. Fraiman, and A. D. Yunakovskii, Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 1, 31 (1975)

View on Pith 1975
[31]

A. V. Mamaev, A. A. Zozulya, V. K. Mezentsev, D. Z. Anderson, and M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1110 (1997)

View on Pith 1997
[32]

W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, J. J. Rasmussen, and J. Wyller, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016612 (2001)

View on Pith 2001
[33]

J. Wyller, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, and J. J. Rasmussen, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066615 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[34]

C. Rotschild, O. Cohen, O. Manela, M. Segev, and T. Carmon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 213904 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[35]

W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, J. Wyller, J. J. Rasmussen, and D. Edmundson, J. Opt. B: Quantum and Semiclass. Opt. 6, S288 (2004)

View on Pith 2004
[36]

I. A. Kolchugina, V. A. Mironov, and A. M. Sergeev, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 31, 333 (1980). [JETP Lett. 31, 304 (1980)]

View on Pith 1980
[37]

X. Hutsebaut, C. Cambournac, M. Haelterman, A. Adamski, and K. Neyts, Opt. Commun. 233, 211 (2004)

View on Pith 2004
[38]

Z. Xu, Y. V. Kartashov, and L. Torner, Opt. Lett. 30, 3171 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[39]

N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, J. J. Rasmussen, and P. L. Christiansen, Opt. Lett. 29, 286 (2004)

View on Pith 2004
[40]

A. Dreischuh, D. N. Neshev, D. E. Petersen, O. Bang, and W. Krolikowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 043901 (2006)

View on Pith 2006
[41]

V. A. Mironov, A. M. Sergeev, and E. M. Sher, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 260, 325 (1981) [Sov. Phys. Dokl. 26, 861 (1981)]

View on Pith 1981
[42]

S. Lopez-Aguayo, A. S. Desyatnikov, Y. S. Kivshar, S. Skupin, W. Krolikowski, and O. Bang, arXiv.org, nlin.PS/0512053 (2005). 8

View on Pith arXiv 2005
[43]

M. Mitchell, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4657 (1998)

View on Pith 1998
[44]

E. A. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, D. V. Skryabin, and W. J. Firth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 296 (1999)

View on Pith 1999
[45]

J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, V. Perez-Garcia, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and Y. S. Kivshar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 82 (2000)

View on Pith 2000
[46]

W. Krolikowski, E. A. Ostrovskaya, C. Weilnau, M. Geisser, G. McCarthy, Y. S. Kivshar, C. Denz, and B. Luther-Davies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1424 (2000)

View on Pith 2000
[47]

T. Carmon, C. Anastassiou, S. Lan, D. Kip, Z. H. Musslimani, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, Opt. Lett. 25, 1113 (2000)

View on Pith 2000
[48]

A. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, E. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, W. Krolikowski, B. Luther-Davies, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, and V. Perez-Garcia, Opt. Lett. 26, 435 (2001)

View on Pith 2001
[49]

D. Neshev, G. McCarthy, W. Krolikowski, E. A. Ostrovskaya, G. F. Calvo, F. Agullo-Lopez, and Y. S. Kivshar, Opt. Lett. 26, 1185 (2001)

View on Pith 2001
[50]

A. S. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, E. A. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, G. McCarthy, W. Krolikowski, and B. Luther-Davies, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 586 (2002)

View on Pith 2002
[51]

J. Yang and D. E. Pelinovsky, Phys. Rev. E 67, 016608 (2003). 9 Figure captions Figure 1. Total refractive index profile (left column) and fiel d modulus distribution in second component (right column) for (a) dipole soliton at b , , and d , (b ) quadrupo le so liton at b , , and , (c) hexapole soliton at b , b , and d . 1 3= 92 1.8b = 4d = 3= 1 3= 5= 2 0...

View on Pith 2003

How the literature uses it

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

How each label was checked · JSON

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

We discover that under proper conditions the combination of nonlocality and vectorial coupling has a remarkable stabilizing action on multi-humped solitons.

Stabilization of vector soliton complexes in nonlocal nonlinear media · 0.85

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

M. Peccianti, K. A. Brzdakiewicz, and G. Assanto, “Nonlocal spatial soliton interactions in nematic liquid crystals”, Opt. Lett. 27, 1460 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[2] [2]

M. Peccianti, C. Conti, and G. Assanto, “Interplay between nonlocality and nonlinearity in nematic liquid crystals”, Opt. Lett. 30, 415 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[3] [3]

F. Derrien, J. F. Henninot, M. Warenghem, and G. Abbate, “A thermal (2D+1) spatial optical soliton in a dye doped liquid crystal,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2, 332 (2000)

View on Pith 2000

[4] [4]

A. G. Litvak, V. A. Mironov, G. M. Fraiman, and A. D. Yunakovskii, “Thermal self-effect of waves in plasma with a nonlocal nonlinearity”, Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 1, 31 (1975)

View on Pith 1975

[5] [5]

A. V. Mamaev, A. A. Zozulya, V. K. Mezentsev, D. Z. Anderson, and M. Saffman, “Bound dipole solitary solutions in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media”, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1110 (1997)

View on Pith 1997

[6] [6]

W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, J. J. Rasmussen, and J. Wyller, “Modulational instability in nonlocal nonlinear Kerr media”, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016612 (2001)

View on Pith 2001

[7] [7]

J. Wyller, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, and J. J. Rasmussen, “Generic features of modulational instability in nonlocal Kerr media”, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066615 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[8] [8]

C. Rotschild, O. Cohen, O. Manela, M. Segev, and T. Carmon, “Solitons in nonlinear media with an infinite range of nonlocality: first observation of coherent elliptic solitons and of vortex-ring solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 213904 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[9] [9]

W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, J. Wyller, J. J. Rasmussen, and D. Edmundson, “Modulational instability, solitons and beam propagation in spatially nonlocal nonlinear media,” J. Opt. B: Quantum and Semiclass. Opt. 6, S288 (2004)

View on Pith 2004

[10] [10]

and observed in [11]. Th e maximum number of solitons that can be packed into stable bound state depends on the nature of nonlocal response [12]. Bound states of dark solitons were addressed in [13,14]. Two-dimensional bright solitons also for m bound states in nonlo cal media [5,15]. Recently, stable dipole solitons in a mediu m with Gaussian response fu...

View on Pith

[11] [12]

X. Hutsebaut, C. Cambournac, M. Haelterman, A. Adamski, and K. Neyts, “Single-component higher-order mode solitons in liquid crystals” Opt. Commun. 233, 211 (2004). 5

View on Pith 2004

[12] [13]

Z. Xu, Y. V. Kartashov, and L. Torner, “Upper threshold for stability of multipole-mode solitons in nonlocal nonlinear media,” Opt. Lett. 30, 3171 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[13] [14]

N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, J. J. Rasmussen, and P. L. Christiansen, “Attraction of nonlocal dark optical solitons” Opt. Lett. 29, 286 (2004)

View on Pith 2004

[14] [15]

A. Dreischuh, D. N. Neshev, D. E. Petersen, O. Bang, and W. Krolikowski, “Observation of attraction between dark solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 043901 (2006)

View on Pith 2006

[15] [18]

M. Mitchell, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of multihump multimode solitons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4657 (1998)

View on Pith 1998

[16] [19]

E. A. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, D. V. Skryabin, and W. J. Firth, “Stability of multihump optical solitons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 296 (1999)

View on Pith 1999

[17] [20]

J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, V. Perez-Garcia, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Dipole-mode vector solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 82 (2000)

View on Pith 2000

[18] [21]

W. Krolikowski, E. A. Ostrovskaya, C. Weilnau, M. Geisser, G. McCarthy, Y. S. Kivshar, C. Denz, and B. Luther-Davies, “Observation of dipole-mode vector solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1424 (2000)

View on Pith 2000

[19] [22]

T. Carmon, C. Anastassiou, S. Lan, D. Kip, Z. H. Musslimani, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of two-dimensional multimode solitons,” Opt. Lett. 25, 1113 (2000)

View on Pith 2000

[20] [23]

A. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, E. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, W. Krolikowski, B. Luther-Davies, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, and V. Perez-Garcia, “Multipole spatial vector solitons,” Opt. Lett. 26, 435 (2001)

View on Pith 2001

[21] [24]

D. Neshev, G. McCarthy, W. Krolikowski, E. A. Ostrovskaya, G. F. Calvo, F. Agullo-Lopez, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Dipole-mode vector solitons in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media,” Opt. Lett. 26, 1185 (2001). 6

View on Pith 2001

[22] [25]

A. S. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, E. A. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, G. McCarthy, W. Krolikowski, and B. Luther-Davies, “Multipole composite spatial solitons: theory and experiment,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 586 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[23] [26]

J. Yang and D. E. Pelinovsky, “Stable vortex and dipole vector solitons in a saturable nonlinear medium,” Phys. Rev. E 67, 016608 (2003). 7 References without titles

View on Pith 2003

[24] [27]

M. Peccianti, K. A. Brzdakiewicz, and G. Assanto, Opt. Lett. 27, 1460 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[25] [28]

M. Peccianti, C. Conti, and G. Assanto, Opt. Lett. 30, 415 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[26] [29]

F. Derrien, J. F. Henninot, M. Warenghem, and G. Abbate, J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2, 332 (2000)

View on Pith 2000

[27] [30]

A. G. Litvak, V. A. Mironov, G. M. Fraiman, and A. D. Yunakovskii, Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 1, 31 (1975)

View on Pith 1975

[28] [31]

A. V. Mamaev, A. A. Zozulya, V. K. Mezentsev, D. Z. Anderson, and M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1110 (1997)

View on Pith 1997

[29] [32]

W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, J. J. Rasmussen, and J. Wyller, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016612 (2001)

View on Pith 2001

[30] [33]

J. Wyller, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, and J. J. Rasmussen, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066615 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[31] [34]

C. Rotschild, O. Cohen, O. Manela, M. Segev, and T. Carmon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 213904 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[32] [35]

W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, J. Wyller, J. J. Rasmussen, and D. Edmundson, J. Opt. B: Quantum and Semiclass. Opt. 6, S288 (2004)

View on Pith 2004

[33] [36]

I. A. Kolchugina, V. A. Mironov, and A. M. Sergeev, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 31, 333 (1980). [JETP Lett. 31, 304 (1980)]

View on Pith 1980

[34] [37]

X. Hutsebaut, C. Cambournac, M. Haelterman, A. Adamski, and K. Neyts, Opt. Commun. 233, 211 (2004)

View on Pith 2004

[35] [38]

Z. Xu, Y. V. Kartashov, and L. Torner, Opt. Lett. 30, 3171 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[36] [39]

N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, J. J. Rasmussen, and P. L. Christiansen, Opt. Lett. 29, 286 (2004)

View on Pith 2004

[37] [40]

A. Dreischuh, D. N. Neshev, D. E. Petersen, O. Bang, and W. Krolikowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 043901 (2006)

View on Pith 2006

[38] [41]

V. A. Mironov, A. M. Sergeev, and E. M. Sher, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 260, 325 (1981) [Sov. Phys. Dokl. 26, 861 (1981)]

View on Pith 1981

[39] [42]

S. Lopez-Aguayo, A. S. Desyatnikov, Y. S. Kivshar, S. Skupin, W. Krolikowski, and O. Bang, arXiv.org, nlin.PS/0512053 (2005). 8

View on Pith arXiv 2005

[40] [43]

M. Mitchell, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4657 (1998)

View on Pith 1998

[41] [44]

E. A. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, D. V. Skryabin, and W. J. Firth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 296 (1999)

View on Pith 1999

[42] [45]

J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, V. Perez-Garcia, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and Y. S. Kivshar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 82 (2000)

View on Pith 2000

[43] [46]

W. Krolikowski, E. A. Ostrovskaya, C. Weilnau, M. Geisser, G. McCarthy, Y. S. Kivshar, C. Denz, and B. Luther-Davies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1424 (2000)

View on Pith 2000

[44] [47]

T. Carmon, C. Anastassiou, S. Lan, D. Kip, Z. H. Musslimani, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, Opt. Lett. 25, 1113 (2000)

View on Pith 2000

[45] [48]

A. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, E. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, W. Krolikowski, B. Luther-Davies, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, and V. Perez-Garcia, Opt. Lett. 26, 435 (2001)

View on Pith 2001

[46] [49]

D. Neshev, G. McCarthy, W. Krolikowski, E. A. Ostrovskaya, G. F. Calvo, F. Agullo-Lopez, and Y. S. Kivshar, Opt. Lett. 26, 1185 (2001)

View on Pith 2001

[47] [50]

A. S. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, E. A. Ostrovskaya, Y. S. Kivshar, G. McCarthy, W. Krolikowski, and B. Luther-Davies, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 586 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

[48] [51]

J. Yang and D. E. Pelinovsky, Phys. Rev. E 67, 016608 (2003). 9 Figure captions Figure 1. Total refractive index profile (left column) and fiel d modulus distribution in second component (right column) for (a) dipole soliton at b , , and d , (b ) quadrupo le so liton at b , , and , (c) hexapole soliton at b , b , and d . 1 3= 92 1.8b = 4d = 3= 1 3= 5= 2 0...

View on Pith 2003