Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Giant phase-conjugate reflection with a normal mirror in front of an optical phase-conjugator

Optics · Submitted 2 Apr 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The presence of a suitably chosen normal mirror in front of the phase conjugator is found to greatly enhance the total phase-conjugate reflected power, even up to an order of magnitude.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDphysics/9804003 (version 1)
Pith IDSDUEWJZ6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Lodder, D. Lenstra, M. Blaauboer. "Giant phase-conjugate reflection with a normal mirror in front of an optical phase-conjugator." arXiv:physics/9804003 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/SDUEWJZ6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,590 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.43 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.28 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.89 · compares with prior results 0.31 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We theoretically study reflection of light by a phase-conjugating mirror preceded by a partially reflecting normal mirror. The presence of a suitably chosen normal mirror in front of the phase conjugator is found to greatly enhance the total phase-conjugate reflected power, even up to an order of magnitude. Required conditions are that the phase-conjugating mirror itself amplifies upon reflection and that constructive interference of light in the region between the mirrors takes place. We show that the phase-conjugate reflected power then exhibits a maximum as a function of the transmittance of the normal mirror.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We theoretically study reflection of light by a phase-conjugating mirror preceded by a partially reflecting normal mirror. contribution 0.96 0.85 0.04 asserted 0.55
s1 The presence of a suitably chosen normal mirror in front of the phase conjugator is found to greatly enhance the total phase-conjugate reflected power, even up to an order of magnitude. result 1.00 0.91 0.88 asserted 1.00
s2 Required conditions are that the phase-conjugating mirror itself amplifies upon reflection and that constructive interference of light in the region between the mirrors takes place. interpretation 0.48 0.65 0.10 asserted 0.99
s3 We show that the phase-conjugate reflected power then exhibits a maximum as a function of the transmittance of the normal mirror. result 0.98 0.92 0.16 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We theoretically study reflection of light by a phase-conjugating mirror preceded by a partially reflecting normal mirror. The presence of a suitably chosen normal mirror in front of the phase conjugator is found to greatly enhance the total phase-conjugate reflected power, even up to an order of magnitude. Required conditions are that the phase-conjugating mirror itself amplifies upon reflection and that constructive interference of light in the region between the mirrors takes place. We show that the phase-conjugate reflected power then exhibits a maximum as a function of the transmittance of the normal mirror.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.