Pith. Sign in

RECORD

In silicio stretching of chromatin

Biomolecules · Submitted 21 Sep 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Finally, we show that the chromatin fiber does not behave as an isotropic elastic rod, but its rigidity depends on the direction of deformation: chromatin is much more resistant to stretching than to bending.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDq-bio/0509024 (version 1)
Pith ID3BVZKAP3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationFilip Lankas, Frank Aumann, J\"org Langowski, Maiwen Caudron. "In silicio stretching of chromatin." arXiv:q-bio/0509024 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/3BVZKAP3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,827 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.16 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.45 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.84 · compares with prior results 0.79 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations of the stretching of a single 30 nm chromatin fiber. The model approximates the DNA by a flexible polymer chain with Debye-H\"uckel electrostatics and uses a two-angle zig-zag model for the geometry of the linker DNA connecting the nucleosomes. The latter are represented by flat disks interacting via an attractive Gay-Berne potential. Our results show that the stiffness of the chromatin fiber strongly depends on the linker DNA length. Furthermore, changing the twisting angle between nucleosomes from 90 deg to 130 deg increases the stiffness significantly. An increase in the opening angle from 22 deg to 34 deg leads to softer fibers for small linker lengths. We observe that fibers containing a linker histone at each nucleosome are stiffer compared to those without the linker histone. The simulated persistence lengths and elastic moduli agree with experimental data. Finally, we show that the chromatin fiber does not behave as an isotropic elastic rod, but its rigidity depends on the direction of deformation: chromatin is much more resistant to stretching than to bending.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations of the stretching of a single 30 nm chromatin fiber. contribution 0.92 0.96 0.04 asserted 0.92
s1 The model approximates the DNA by a flexible polymer chain with Debye-H\"uckel electrostatics and uses a two-angle zig-zag model for the geometry of the linker DNA connecting the nucleosomes. method 1.00 0.72 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 The latter are represented by flat disks interacting via an attractive Gay-Berne potential. method 1.00 0.40 0.02 asserted 0.99
s3 Our results show that the stiffness of the chromatin fiber strongly depends on the linker DNA length. result 1.00 0.96 0.33 asserted 1.00
s4 Furthermore, changing the twisting angle between nucleosomes from 90 deg to 130 deg increases the stiffness significantly. result 1.00 0.95 0.11 asserted 1.00
s5 An increase in the opening angle from 22 deg to 34 deg leads to softer fibers for small linker lengths. result 1.00 0.93 0.05 asserted 1.00
s6 We observe that fibers containing a linker histone at each nucleosome are stiffer compared to those without the linker histone. result 1.00 0.94 0.08 asserted 1.00
s7 The simulated persistence lengths and elastic moduli agree with experimental data. result 0.90 0.89 0.11 asserted 0.98
s8 Finally, we show that the chromatin fiber does not behave as an isotropic elastic rod, but its rigidity depends on the direction of deformation: chromatin is much more resistant to stretching than to bending. result 0.96 0.95 0.47 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations of the stretching of a single 30 nm chromatin fiber. The model approximates the DNA by a flexible polymer chain with Debye-H\"uckel electrostatics and uses a two-angle zig-zag model for the geometry of the linker DNA connecting the nucleosomes. The latter are represented by flat disks interacting via an attractive Gay-Berne potential. Our results show that the stiffness of the chromatin fiber strongly depends on the linker DNA length. Furthermore, changing the twisting angle between nucleosomes from 90 deg to 130 deg increases the stiffness significantly. An increase in the opening angle from 22 deg to 34 deg leads to softer fibers for small linker lengths. We observe that fibers containing a linker histone at each nucleosome are stiffer compared to those without the linker histone. The simulated persistence lengths and elastic moduli agree with experimental data. Finally, we show that the chromatin fiber does not behave as an isotropic elastic rod, but its rigidity depends on the direction of deformation: chromatin is much more resistant to stretching than to bending.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.