Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Faked states attack using detector efficiency mismatch on SARG04, phase-time, DPSK, and Ekert protocols

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/0702262 v3 pith:QKZLYJK5 submitted 2007-02-27 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords attackdetectorefficiencyfakedprotocolsquantumstatescryptosystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In quantum cryptosystems, variations in detector efficiency can be exploited to stage a successful attack. This happens when the efficiencies of Bob's two detectors are different functions of a control parameter accessible to Eve (e.g., timing of the incoming pulses). It has previously been shown that the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol is vulnerable to this attack. In this paper, we show that several other protocols and encodings may also be vulnerable. We consider a faked states attack in the case of a partial efficiency mismatch on the Scarani-Acin-Ribordy-Gisin 2004 (SARG04) protocol, and derive the quantum bit error rate as a function of detector efficiencies. Additionally, it is shown how faked states can in principle be constructed for quantum cryptosystems that use a phase-time encoding, the differential phase shift keying (DPSK) and the Ekert protocols.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution: Protocols, Quantum Games, and Security

    quant-ph 2025-05 unverdicted

    This paper surveys device-independent QKD, covering protocols, nonlocal games, security proofs, experimental demonstrations, and open problems.

Pith tools