REVIEW 2 cited by
Naive Realism about Operators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A source of much difficulty and confusion in the interpretation of quantum mechanics is a ``naive realism about operators.'' By this we refer to various ways of taking too seriously the notion of operator-as-observable, and in particular to the all too casual talk about ``measuring operators'' that occurs when the subject is quantum mechanics. Without a specification of what should be meant by ``measuring'' a quantum observable, such an expression can have no clear meaning. A definite specification is provided by Bohmian mechanics, a theory that emerges from Sch\"rodinger's equation for a system of particles when we merely insist that ``particles'' means particles. Bohmian mechanics clarifies the status and the role of operators as observables in quantum mechanics by providing the operational details absent from standard quantum mechanics. It thereby allows us to readily dismiss all the radical claims traditionally enveloping the transition from the classical to the quantum realm---for example, that we must abandon classical logic or classical probability. The moral is rather simple: Beware naive realism, especially about operators!
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Mechanical form factors and densities of non-relativistic fermions
Non-relativistic fermion energy-momentum tensor matrix elements are decomposed into Galilei-covariant mechanical form factors using new eight-component spinors, with pilot-wave based density formulas separating intern...
-
Quantum Systems as Indivisible Stochastic Processes
The stochastic-quantum correspondence rewrites any quantum unitary as a matrix of squared entries, making quantum systems formally equivalent to indivisible stochastic processes, but the equivalence is definitional an...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.