pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in
Pith Number

pith:5ADIT5FP

pith:2026:5ADIT5FPASX7SYCV3OI7QGDAAW
not attested not anchored not stored refs resolved

Constitutional Governance in Metric Spaces

Ehud Shapiro, Nimrod Talmon

Constitutional governance in metric spaces integrates voting, proposal submission, and supermajority amendment into a single polynomial-time protocol that communities can run on personal devices.

arxiv:2605.13362 v2 · 2026-05-13 · cs.MA · cs.AI · cs.DC · cs.GT · econ.TH

Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{5ADIT5FPASX7SYCV3OI7QGDAAW}

Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more

Record completeness

1 Bitcoin timestamp
2 Internet Archive
3 Author claim open · sign in to claim
4 Citations open
5 Replications open
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.

Claims

C1strongest claim

We propose constitutional governance in metric spaces, integrating these stages into a coherent polynomial-time protocol for constitutional governance.

C2weakest assumption

That public proposals carrying supermajority support can be effectively sourced from deliberation, vote aggregation, or AI mediation, and that the generalized median rule ensures no misreport weakly dominates sincere voting at majority threshold.

C3one line summary

A polynomial-time constitutional governance protocol in metric spaces unifies aggregation, supermajority amendment, deliberation, and consensus for digital communities and organizations.

References

30 extracted · 30 resolved · 1 Pith anchors

[1] Abramowitz, B., Shapiro, E., Talmon, N.: In the beginning there werenagents: Founding and amending a constitution. In: Proc. of ADT’21. pp. 119–131 (2021) Constitutional Governance in Metric Spaces 15 2021
[2] Artificial Intelligence264, 27–51 (2018) 2018
[3] Journal of Political Economy 56(1), 23–34 (1948) 1948
[4] Social Choice and Welfare49(3–4), 657–669 (2017) 2017
[5] In: Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK 2025) 2025 · doi:10.4204/eptcs.437.32
Receipt and verification
First computed 2026-05-18T02:44:48.126672Z
Builder pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1
Signature Pith Ed25519 (pith-v1-2026-05) · public key
Schema pith-number/v1.0

Canonical hash

e80689f4af04aff96055db91f818600586b279643e32f693cb7f28ae634f235b

Aliases

arxiv: 2605.13362 · arxiv_version: 2605.13362v2 · doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2605.13362 · pith_short_12: 5ADIT5FPASX7 · pith_short_16: 5ADIT5FPASX7SYCV · pith_short_8: 5ADIT5FP
Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/5ADIT5FPASX7SYCV3OI7QGDAAW \
  | jq -c '.canonical_record' \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: e80689f4af04aff96055db91f818600586b279643e32f693cb7f28ae634f235b
Canonical record JSON
{
  "metadata": {
    "abstract_canon_sha256": "052050f5b28d59eac408e2faf48efc1f0822df3f6310ff4fbb9b05f3d31dbb73",
    "cross_cats_sorted": [
      "cs.AI",
      "cs.DC",
      "cs.GT",
      "econ.TH"
    ],
    "license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
    "primary_cat": "cs.MA",
    "submitted_at": "2026-05-13T11:23:34Z",
    "title_canon_sha256": "421fb2bfb403f5cb66f362e8efec84aafda76a39bb17a4d856f184f063ae0b44"
  },
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "source": {
    "id": "2605.13362",
    "kind": "arxiv",
    "version": 2
  }
}