Pith Number

pith:7ODCUGML

pith:2025:7ODCUGMLJH2E7LQVT3RYDCGA5N

not attested not anchored not stored refs resolved

Approaching Safety-Argumentation-by-Design: A Requirement-based Safety Argumentation Life Cycle for Automated Vehicles

Andreas Dotzler, Marcus Nolte, Markus Maurer, Marvin Loba, Nayel Fabian Salem, Niklas Braun, Richard Schubert, Robert Graubohm, Torben Stolte

A dedicated life cycle for safety argumentation lets developers co-build the case for acceptable residual risk alongside the automated vehicle system from the start.

arxiv:2511.08499 v3 · 2025-11-11 · eess.SY · cs.SY

Open paper page JSON Open Graph Bundle Merged state Verified badge What is a Pith Number?

Add to your LaTeX paper

\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{7ODCUGMLJH2E7LQVT3RYDCGA5N}

Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge

Record completeness

1 Bitcoin timestamp

2 Internet Archive

3 Author claim open · sign in to claim

4 Citations open

5 Replications open

✓ Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged state

The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.

Claims

C1strongest claim

We contribute to the state of the art in terms of process guidance on argumentation creation and maintenance - aiming to promote a safety-argumentation-by-design paradigm, which mandates co-developing both the system and argumentation from the earliest stages.

C2weakest assumption

That extending the systematic design model with an argumentation layer reveals limitations that are best addressed by a separate dedicated life cycle whose phases (baselining, evolution, continuous maintenance) can be implemented via literature- and expert-derived requirements.

C3one line summary

Introduces a requirement-based safety argumentation life cycle to promote co-development of automated vehicle systems and their safety arguments from the start.

References

36 extracted · 36 resolved · 0 Pith anchors

[1] COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/1426 2022

[2] Safety and Acceptance – A View of Two Mysteries, 2023

[3] M. Nolte et al. , Anmerkungen zu Sicherheit und Risiken autonomer Straßenfahrzeuge — Teil 1 & 2 . C.H. BECK, Neue Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht, 5/25 (pp. 198-207), continued in 6/25 (pp. 241-251)

[4] (Vision Zero) – an ethical approach to safety and mobility, 2000

[5] A Review of Conceptualizations of Safety and Risk in Current Automated Driving Regulation, 2025

Receipt and verification

First computed	2026-05-18T02:44:32.977869Z
Builder	pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1
Signature	Pith Ed25519 (`pith-v1-2026-05`) · public key
Schema	pith-number/v1.0

Canonical hash

fb862a198b49f44fae159ee38188c0eb4f64db075575829dcc22da633ed21137

Aliases

arxiv: 2511.08499 · arxiv_version: 2511.08499v3 · doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2511.08499 · pith_short_12: 7ODCUGMLJH2E · pith_short_16: 7ODCUGMLJH2E7LQV · pith_short_8: 7ODCUGML

Agent API

Resolver JSON Graph JSON Events JSON Schema Signing key

Verify this Pith Number yourself

curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/7ODCUGMLJH2E7LQVT3RYDCGA5N \
  | jq -c '.canonical_record' \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: fb862a198b49f44fae159ee38188c0eb4f64db075575829dcc22da633ed21137

Canonical record JSON

{
  "metadata": {
    "abstract_canon_sha256": "c647fce552325a36c687d27c34d821edb496177116c726b8cbb0a5e25531cd6c",
    "cross_cats_sorted": [
      "cs.SY"
    ],
    "license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
    "primary_cat": "eess.SY",
    "submitted_at": "2025-11-11T17:34:28Z",
    "title_canon_sha256": "729f7bdde93635a35fd9404f637dea7a7be036aaad16dbf42d7e3a5c741e2ef8"
  },
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "source": {
    "id": "2511.08499",
    "kind": "arxiv",
    "version": 3
  }
}