Pith. sign in

Explain the Lean def `DirectCoshAdd` in module `IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation`. Write for an educated reader who knows science and programming but may not know Lean. Cover: (1) what the declaration says in plain English, (2) why it matters in Recognition Science, (3) how to read the formal statement, (4) visible dependencies or certificates in the supplied source, and (5) what this declaration does not prove. Cite only declarations present in the supplied Recognition source.

Big AI job. Grok 4.3 reads the canon and writes a Lean-grounded derivation; usually 20 seconds to 2 minutes. Your answer will appear below.
confidence: high in recognition cached

Explanation of DirectCoshAdd in IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation

(1) In plain English: DirectCoshAdd is a predicate on a function Gf : ℝ → ℝ. It asserts that Gf obeys the identity Gf(t + u) + Gf(t - u) = 2·(Gf(t)·Gf(u)) + 2·(Gf(t) + Gf(u)) for every pair of real numbers t and u. This is the direct form of an addition formula that matches the algebraic expansion of cosh(t + u) + cosh(t - u) after a logarithmic reparametrization.

(2) Why it matters in Recognition Science: The predicate supplies one of the functional-equation building blocks used to characterize the recognition cost Jcost. The module shows that Jcost satisfies the related CoshAddIdentity Jcost_cosh_add_identity, which immediately yields DirectCoshAdd (G Cost.Jcost) via the implication lemma. This identity is part of the infrastructure that isolates the unique reciprocal-symmetric cost function required by the T5 step of the forcing chain.

(3) How to read the formal statement: The declaration

def DirectCoshAdd (Gf : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop :=
  ∀ t u : ℝ,
    Gf (t+u) + Gf (t-u) = 2 * (Gf t * Gf u) + 2 * (Gf t + Gf u)

introduces a named proposition (Prop) that takes a function Gf and universally quantifies the displayed equality over all real t and u. In Lean syntax the colon : separates the binder from the body; is universal quantification; Prop is the type of propositions.

(4) Visible dependencies or certificates in the supplied source: The definition appears directly in module IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation. It is connected to the companion predicate by the lemma CoshAddIdentity_implies_DirectCoshAdd. The concrete cost function satisfies the antecedent via Jcost_cosh_add_identity and the auxiliary identity Jcost_G_eq_cosh_sub_one. All cited declarations are free of sorry and external axioms in the supplied slice.

(5) What this declaration does not prove: DirectCoshAdd is only a definition; it does not assert that any specific function (including Jcost) satisfies the property—that is supplied by the separate theorem Jcost_cosh_add_identity. It does not contain the smoothness or ODE-uniqueness arguments that complete the uniqueness proof for Jcost, nor does it derive physical constants or the full T5 forcing statement.

outside recognition

Aspects Recognition does not yet address:

  • The complete T5 uniqueness theorem and its downstream derivation of ħ and G from φ

recognition modules consulted

The Recognition library is at github.com/jonwashburn/shape-of-logic. The model is restricted to the supplied Lean source and instructed not to invent theorem names. Treat output as a starting point, not a verified proof.