Pith. sign in

Explain the Lean def `LinearFeasible` in module `IndisputableMonolith.Complexity.SAT.BWD3SchurPinch`. Write for an educated reader who knows science and programming but may not know Lean. Cover: (1) what the declaration says in plain English, (2) why it matters in Recognition Science, (3) how to read the formal statement, (4) visible dependencies or certificates in the supplied source, and (5) what this declaration does not prove. Cite only declarations present in the supplied Recognition source.

Big AI job. Grok 4.3 reads the canon and writes a Lean-grounded derivation; usually 20 seconds to 2 minutes. Your answer will appear below.
confidence: low outside recognition cached

The supplied source modules (AlexanderDuality, LanglandsFromRecognitionCost, RealityFromDistinction, SingleAnchor, RecognitionBandGeometry, RecognitionBandwidth, RecognitionForcing, ConstructiveNote) contain no reference to module IndisputableMonolith.Complexity.SAT.BWD3SchurPinch or declaration LinearFeasible. No theorem, definition, or dependency from the supplied canon addresses SAT feasibility, BWD3, Schur pinch, or linear feasibility predicates. The question is therefore outside the supplied canon slice.

outside recognition

Aspects Recognition does not yet address:

  • Module IndisputableMonolith.Complexity.SAT.BWD3SchurPinch
  • Declaration LinearFeasible
  • Any SAT-related feasibility predicate or certificate

recognition modules consulted

The Recognition library is at github.com/jonwashburn/shape-of-logic. The model is restricted to the supplied Lean source and instructed not to invent theorem names. Treat output as a starting point, not a verified proof.