pith. sign in

Explain the theorem SatisfiesCompositionLaw from IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation.

Big AI job. Grok 4.3 reads the canon and writes a Lean-grounded derivation; usually 20 seconds to 2 minutes. Your answer will appear below.
confidence: moderate in recognition cached

SatisfiesCompositionLaw is the predicate asserting that a cost functional F satisfies the Recognition Composition Law. In the canon it is equivalent to CoshAddIdentity via the theorem composition_law_equiv_coshAdd. For Jcost the property holds because Jcost_cosh_add_identity establishes the cosh-add identity and the equivalence is applied in the opposite direction.

Explicitly: let F = Jcost. Then (composition_law_equiv_coshAdd Jcost).2 Jcost_cosh_add_identity yields SatisfiesCompositionLaw Jcost. This is the hypothesis hComp in unique_cost_on_pos_from_rcl, which together with reciprocal symmetry, normalization, calibration and continuity forces F = Jcost on (0, ∞) by reducing to the d'Alembert equation whose unique continuous solution with the given second derivative at zero is cosh, hence Jcost after the log reparametrization G and H.

cited recognition theorems

outside recognition

Aspects Recognition does not yet address:

  • The explicit definition of SatisfiesCompositionLaw itself is not present in the supplied (truncated) source slice of IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation.

recognition modules consulted

The Recognition library is at github.com/jonwashburn/shape-of-logic. The model is restricted to the supplied Lean source and instructed not to invent theorem names. Treat output as a starting point, not a verified proof.