Yang-Mills Mass Gap Derivation
The derivation establishes a positive spectral gap on the φ-lattice from the J-cost functional alone.
Step 1. The φ-inverse identity phi_inv_eq gives φ⁻¹ = φ − 1. Combined with phi_plus_inv, this yields the exact gap value.
Step 2. Jcost_phi_exact proves Jcost(φ) = (√5 − 2)/2. Define massGap ≔ (√5 − 2)/2.
Step 3. massGap_pos and Jcost_phi_pos establish 0 < massGap.
Step 4. Jcost_mono_gt_one shows J is monotone on (1, ∞). Hence spectral_gap_pos_rung and spectral_gap prove: for all n ≠ 0, massGap ≤ Jcost(φⁿ).
Step 5. Gauge configurations are modeled by GaugeBondConfig. gauge_mass_gap shows any non-trivial configuration has total cost > 0. gauge_cost_ge_gap gives the quantitative lower bound massGap.
Step 6. ym_lattice_gap confirms the lattice gap: any excitation r ≠ 1 satisfies Jcost(r) > 0, with vacuum uniqueness at r = 1.
The gap Δ = J(φ) is therefore exact, positive, universal across SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1) on Q₃, and parameter-free.