IndisputableMonolith.Physics.QuantumTeleportationFromRS
Module recording that the quantum-information dimension is five via 5 = D+2 once RS forces D=3, and packaging a QI teleportation protocol certificate. Cite it when bridging T8 spatial dimension to protocol counts. Argument is definitional plus a short arithmetic identity and cert bundle.
claimWith spatial dimension $D=3$ forced by Recognition Science, the quantum-information dimension satisfies $5=D+2$. The module packages a five-step QI teleportation protocol and an RS certificate for that count.
background
Recognition Science forces three spatial dimensions at step T8 of the unified forcing chain. Quantum-information protocols, teleportation in particular, are counted in an effective dimension two larger than spatial $D$.
This module sits in the Physics domain and introduces the protocol type, its count, the identity $5=D+2$, and a teleportation certificate bundle. The module doc-comment states the headline relation: QI dimension from RS is $D+2$. Only Mathlib is imported; the link to T8 is by framework convention rather than a local import edge.
proof idea
Definition and certificate module, not a deep derivation. Once $D=3$ is fixed, $5=D+2$ is arithmetic. Sibling definitions introduce the protocol carrier and count; the identity lemma records the dimension equation; the certificate bundles that count for downstream physics claims. No tactic-heavy proof body beyond the identity.
why it matters in Recognition Science
Connects the RS forcing landmark T8 ($D=3$) to quantum teleportation structure by identifying the QI dimension as five. Downstream consumers are any physics results that need a certified five-step teleportation protocol grounded in RS dimension counting rather than postulated by hand. The module does not yet sit under a named parent theorem in the graph (no used_by edges), so it functions as a leaf certificate source for later QI-from-RS claims.
scope and limits
- Does not derive teleportation from the Recognition Composition Law or J-cost.
- Does not prove unitarity, fidelity, or no-cloning bounds.
- Does not link to the eight-tick octave, phi-ladder, or mass formula.
- Does not supply experimental QI predictions beyond the dimension count.
- Does not import or re-prove T8; it assumes D=3 by framework convention.